If we are going to drop bombs it needs to be for affect. It doesn’t really matter if it changes the outcome of the civil war but if we are going to do it we need to launch a sustained strike against his military that does sign cant damage and makes the next despot reconsider using chemical agents to keep the peasants in line or we need to stay out and do nothing militarily at all. We don’t need to get involved in civil war where we really don’t like either side and we don’t want drop bombs to save face.
So... a limited strike on Syria ?
- 29/08/2013 04:31:07 PM
1232 Views
Re: So... a limited strike on Syria ?
- 29/08/2013 10:43:15 PM
770 Views
I think you're wrong.
- 30/08/2013 04:44:53 AM
740 Views
I don't really care
- 30/08/2013 10:35:55 AM
743 Views
You can't effectively bomb Chemical and biological weapons stockpiles without using a nuke.
- 30/08/2013 02:01:38 PM
779 Views
I am not a fan of symbolic bombing
- 30/08/2013 12:52:01 PM
778 Views
Looks like the buck inexplicably stops at Congress
- 31/08/2013 11:23:20 PM
699 Views
Well it sets a good precedent anyway
- 01/09/2013 12:13:05 AM
666 Views
Unsure; I like the War Powers Resolution approach, though I am unsure of its constitutionality.
- 01/09/2013 01:49:15 AM
857 Views
Nice theory, to bad it is crap
- 01/09/2013 06:23:31 PM
702 Views
Again, Rand Paul is loony left now?
- 01/09/2013 10:15:17 PM
900 Views
Again you seem to have read most the words but completely missed the point
- 02/09/2013 06:48:26 PM
826 Views
Rand Paul=/=MSNBC
- 02/09/2013 09:30:50 PM
688 Views
No... not quite. Youre really are quite skilled at missing the point aren't you?
- 02/09/2013 11:20:02 PM
738 Views
Oh, no, I got the point.
- 03/09/2013 01:48:01 AM
705 Views
The only "point" you have is the talking points, and you hit them all, facts be damned. *NM*
- 03/09/2013 02:56:06 AM
293 Views
Considering the WPRs constitutionality and agreeing Obama is being cowardly are not talking points.
- 03/09/2013 03:52:44 AM
840 Views
Re: Considering the WPRs ... talking points. (had to snip it due to length)
- 03/09/2013 05:49:08 PM
768 Views
"The only 'point' you have is the talking points...;" clearly those were not the sole points,
- 03/09/2013 10:08:43 PM
792 Views
Nah, I'm good, I've said what I wanted. I'm sure we'll get the opportunity to disagree again 
- 04/09/2013 05:58:47 AM
819 Views
- 04/09/2013 05:58:47 AM
819 Views
Fox and Joe Lieberman=/=MSNBC either.
- 02/09/2013 10:21:16 PM
843 Views
Again you seem to have read most the words but completely missed the point
- 03/09/2013 01:17:29 AM
649 Views
Paul is saying what he always has: The commander-in-chief needs Congress' permission to command
- 03/09/2013 02:08:34 AM
663 Views
I see what the problem is
- 04/09/2013 01:07:08 PM
685 Views
More like the left hive does not know what the right hive is doing; Republicans are NOT cat herders.
- 04/09/2013 09:57:07 PM
761 Views
Yeah, I don't like any of it.
- 01/09/2013 12:40:35 AM
704 Views
Glad to hear you think he should more like Bush and asked congrees first
- 01/09/2013 06:27:03 PM
638 Views
How about no strike per the American people? Period. Fucking idiots in Washington.
- 01/09/2013 05:01:13 AM
735 Views
Re: How about no strike per the American people? Period. Fucking idiots in Washington.
- 01/09/2013 04:06:13 PM
780 Views
To be fair, that was what the American people said in 1940
- 02/09/2013 05:19:46 AM
691 Views
That comparison is not valid.
- 05/09/2013 09:25:38 PM
708 Views
Again, "I am not saying this situation is remotely like that one."
- 05/09/2013 10:48:39 PM
674 Views