What do you think ?
not sure I get the rationale. Obama has maneuvered himself into a bad position. Most of the public opposed a strike, but if he were to sit this one out, it would also reflect bad on him. So he is pretty much in a lose lose situation.
So... a limited strike on Syria ?
29/08/2013 04:31:07 PM
- 1098 Views
Re: So... a limited strike on Syria ?
29/08/2013 10:43:15 PM
- 638 Views
I think you're wrong.
30/08/2013 04:44:53 AM
- 617 Views
I don't really care
30/08/2013 10:35:55 AM
- 617 Views
You can't effectively bomb Chemical and biological weapons stockpiles without using a nuke.
30/08/2013 02:01:38 PM
- 657 Views
Looks like the buck inexplicably stops at Congress
31/08/2013 11:23:20 PM
- 574 Views
Well it sets a good precedent anyway
01/09/2013 12:13:05 AM
- 547 Views
Unsure; I like the War Powers Resolution approach, though I am unsure of its constitutionality.
01/09/2013 01:49:15 AM
- 727 Views
Nice theory, to bad it is crap
01/09/2013 06:23:31 PM
- 551 Views
Again, Rand Paul is loony left now?
01/09/2013 10:15:17 PM
- 764 Views
Again you seem to have read most the words but completely missed the point
02/09/2013 06:48:26 PM
- 698 Views
Rand Paul=/=MSNBC
02/09/2013 09:30:50 PM
- 558 Views
No... not quite. Youre really are quite skilled at missing the point aren't you?
02/09/2013 11:20:02 PM
- 602 Views
Oh, no, I got the point.
03/09/2013 01:48:01 AM
- 603 Views
The only "point" you have is the talking points, and you hit them all, facts be damned. *NM*
03/09/2013 02:56:06 AM
- 241 Views
Considering the WPRs constitutionality and agreeing Obama is being cowardly are not talking points.
03/09/2013 03:52:44 AM
- 703 Views
Re: Considering the WPRs ... talking points. (had to snip it due to length)
03/09/2013 05:49:08 PM
- 633 Views
"The only 'point' you have is the talking points...;" clearly those were not the sole points,
03/09/2013 10:08:43 PM
- 658 Views
Nah, I'm good, I've said what I wanted. I'm sure we'll get the opportunity to disagree again
04/09/2013 05:58:47 AM
- 693 Views
Fox and Joe Lieberman=/=MSNBC either.
02/09/2013 10:21:16 PM
- 702 Views
Again you seem to have read most the words but completely missed the point
03/09/2013 01:17:29 AM
- 523 Views
Paul is saying what he always has: The commander-in-chief needs Congress' permission to command
03/09/2013 02:08:34 AM
- 538 Views
I see what the problem is
04/09/2013 01:07:08 PM
- 558 Views
More like the left hive does not know what the right hive is doing; Republicans are NOT cat herders.
04/09/2013 09:57:07 PM
- 634 Views
Yeah, I don't like any of it.
01/09/2013 12:40:35 AM
- 582 Views
Glad to hear you think he should more like Bush and asked congrees first
01/09/2013 06:27:03 PM
- 519 Views
How about no strike per the American people? Period. Fucking idiots in Washington.
01/09/2013 05:01:13 AM
- 608 Views
Re: How about no strike per the American people? Period. Fucking idiots in Washington.
01/09/2013 04:06:13 PM
- 652 Views
To be fair, that was what the American people said in 1940
02/09/2013 05:19:46 AM
- 562 Views
That comparison is not valid.
05/09/2013 09:25:38 PM
- 584 Views
Again, "I am not saying this situation is remotely like that one."
05/09/2013 10:48:39 PM
- 548 Views