If "pro life" is required to mean "no abortions ever" and pro gun is required to mean "may shoot to defend property," then I agree with you; we do have a conflict. I think you'll find that the two positions are less like points, though, and more like spectrums. There are a LOT of conservatives out there (myself included) who believe that abortions are justified when the mother's life is threatened, and that you shouldn't be allowed to shoot someone for stealing your truck.

I guess what I'm really trying to convey is that "pro life" and "pro gun" are not incompatible, and that it's unfair to paint conservatism in general with such a broad brush. You do make a good point, however, that certain interpretations of each position are much harder to justify. I can't do it myself, but perhaps those who hold such positions can.

Also, as an aside, there's really no call for your snarky "try again" language. I'm not your enemy and my post was very civil. Let's pretend we're friendly acquaintances having a discussion instead of mortal rivals locked in verbal combat.