Active Users:1087 Time:22/11/2024 08:07:47 AM
Yeah, I am trying to catch up now. Joel Send a noteboard - 10/08/2013 08:18:26 AM

The upside of departing for a half a year or so is that now I see as many "new" CMB posts as in wotmanias old days. I would feel worse about necroing if there were anything but tumbleweeds to disturb; what is it, like, 4 posts/day now? If there is a better argument to merge all the MBs, I cannot think of it.

Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
An NSFW question. - 16/04/2013 03:11:37 AM 1241 Views
Wait, what was your question again? *NM* - 16/04/2013 05:11:01 AM 368 Views
No. - 16/04/2013 05:49:20 AM 753 Views
I don't think so but quite possibly - 16/04/2013 05:50:00 AM 750 Views
"I just read it for the san serif." *NM* - 16/04/2013 08:11:45 PM 353 Views
I always wonder how "I just read it for the articles" can even come up - 16/04/2013 10:09:03 PM 761 Views
Probably with the old Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issues - 17/04/2013 11:43:04 AM 775 Views
That would make sense - 17/04/2013 01:32:34 PM 829 Views
That doesn't mean there's no swimsuit issue... - 17/04/2013 06:52:53 PM 798 Views
I think my brain almost melted from that first one - 17/04/2013 09:05:45 PM 698 Views
Because from Playboys very start Hefner tried to legitimize it with serious articles/interviews. - 10/08/2013 05:09:37 AM 627 Views
Good to hear from you again... I think... but you do realize I posted this 4 months ago right? *NM* - 10/08/2013 06:16:16 AM 360 Views
Yeah, I am trying to catch up now. - 10/08/2013 08:18:26 AM 612 Views
Nah, you just read something on a *different* web site... *NM* - 17/04/2013 04:36:44 AM 378 Views
BwAhAHHAhAhAhAaa.... - 22/04/2013 05:33:55 AM 715 Views
- 23/04/2013 03:17:53 AM 923 Views
Re: An NSFW question. - 24/04/2013 01:06:52 PM 665 Views
I would never read if that was true *NM* - 24/04/2013 05:16:13 PM 345 Views

Reply to Message