When a case shows glaring holes in the law, it should by nature cause those laws to be reconsidered
Jay Sherman Send a noteboard - 16/07/2013 07:18:57 PM
View original post
View original postBut what I meant though was that the political issues we discuss are more complicated and less well understood that this trial. I agree with the concept that criminal trials should not be used as entertainment but this particular case is influencing politics. When a case is being used as justification for political action then the merit off the case becomes part of the political discussion.
Which is why we should denounce those who try to use specific criminal cases to advance their rhetoric and agenda, not join them in the gutter. This is no different then those who point to any individual tragedy and try to use crocodile tears and 'think of the children!' to advance their agenda. Let us, instead, denounce those who attempt to damage a person's right to a fair hearing for their gain.
This is the biggest lesson of this particular trial: The state of Florida provides more rights to the killer in a self-defense case than they would otherwise be subject to. This trial shows that, even if you follow someone despite the police telling you not to, then shoot that person dead, you can literally get away with murder. Unfortunately, it seems that Florida politicians are all too happy to continue having these laws protect the killers over the victims, as none of the lawmakers I've seen interviewed have any desire to revisit the laws which created this mess.
Zimmerman = Not Guilty
- 14/07/2013 04:04:07 AM
1777 Views
Any charge, other than stupidity, was rediculous. *NM*
- 14/07/2013 04:24:09 AM
503 Views
But hey...
- 14/07/2013 05:35:11 AM
1000 Views
And THAT is the scary precendent this case sets for the populace
- 14/07/2013 05:28:03 PM
1131 Views
Oh puhleeze... can you get any more rediculous? *NM*
- 14/07/2013 07:22:52 PM
623 Views
HyogaRott baby, you are hurting me here. Can you please stop this?
- 14/07/2013 11:29:00 PM
883 Views
Re: And THAT is the scary precendent this case sets for the populace
- 14/07/2013 07:32:26 PM
930 Views
So it was okay that he was on top of a guy, pounding his head into the pavement?
- 14/07/2013 06:45:17 PM
905 Views
If you can believe Zimmerman's side of the story is 100% truth, I have a bridge for sale...
- 15/07/2013 05:35:08 PM
1003 Views
Silly post - following someone around is not legal justification for physical assault.
- 15/07/2013 12:47:54 AM
814 Views
And lying about self-defense should not be grounds for acquittal of all charges, but there you go *NM*
- 15/07/2013 05:43:15 PM
556 Views
I think it all really has to do with reasonable doubt
- 16/07/2013 01:08:24 PM
889 Views
The burden of proof should have been on the shooter to prove lethal force was necessary
- 16/07/2013 06:52:17 PM
752 Views
So, you prefer "guilty until proven innocent"?
- 16/07/2013 06:54:56 PM
758 Views
Yes, and I also eat babies for breakfast and make sure I kick at least one puppy a day *facepalm*
- 16/07/2013 07:13:11 PM
1014 Views
Re: The burden of proof should have been on the shooter to prove lethal force was necessary
- 16/07/2013 07:18:36 PM
831 Views
Re: The burden of proof should have been on the shooter to prove lethal force was necessary
- 16/07/2013 07:21:42 PM
853 Views
Re: The burden of proof should have been on the shooter to prove lethal force was necessary
- 16/07/2013 07:30:39 PM
862 Views
The kid decided to beat a man who had a gun and got shot for it
- 15/07/2013 03:46:38 AM
880 Views
In a sane world, here is how their interaction plays out
- 15/07/2013 05:44:26 PM
845 Views
Yes. And the fact that he didn't simply ask him what he was doing, tells me he was racial profiling
- 15/07/2013 08:59:41 PM
836 Views
The only way that statement makes sense is if it is sarcasm
- 16/07/2013 12:46:59 PM
788 Views
You are suggesting that it is better to shoot first rather than engage in diplomacy
- 16/07/2013 07:05:32 PM
852 Views
And you continue to ignore all the evidence that supports the theory that Martin attacked Zimmerman
- 16/07/2013 07:20:55 PM
826 Views
You are defending a known liar with a history of domestic violence
- 16/07/2013 07:23:11 PM
913 Views
Actually I am not defending anyone (except the rule of law).
- 16/07/2013 08:00:38 PM
840 Views
You keep insisting that Martin started the fight, giving him no chance of his own self-defense right
- 16/07/2013 09:25:17 PM
803 Views
Please, Please, PLEASE actually read the laws of Florida that I have posted a link to for you.
- 16/07/2013 09:41:15 PM
831 Views
I have read the laws you linked to, I fail to see how they cannot also apply to Martin
- 16/07/2013 10:40:46 PM
799 Views
You failed to identify any laws. *NM*
- 16/07/2013 10:49:20 PM
481 Views
I saved it for the reply to Isaac below if you really need it *NM*
- 16/07/2013 11:07:53 PM
619 Views
Re: I have read the laws you linked to, I fail to see how they cannot also apply to Martin
- 17/07/2013 03:41:58 AM
827 Views
And tomorrow I get to preach about the Good Samaritan.
- 14/07/2013 05:26:50 AM
1065 Views
Where's your forgiveness?? Judge not lest ye be judged.
- 14/07/2013 07:10:14 PM
829 Views
Did I say a thing about Zimmerman? No.
- 14/07/2013 08:44:26 PM
968 Views
Oh my gosh. I'm so sorry. Which neighborhood watch were you referring to?
- 15/07/2013 12:46:44 AM
931 Views
Float your concept of grace in front of your priest sometime.
- 15/07/2013 04:31:34 AM
800 Views
What concept of grace is that? Where did I discuss anything remotely touching on grace?
- 19/07/2013 12:10:12 PM
813 Views
Time to climb to the roof of the city morgue and light the Dexter signal. *NM*
- 15/07/2013 04:41:35 AM
583 Views
You'd think the rain of venom in here would make everyone's soapbox too slippery to stand on
- 15/07/2013 01:05:41 PM
845 Views
would that be true for most of politics as well? *NM*
- 16/07/2013 12:58:33 PM
523 Views
Depends on the case, but those aren't individual life and death criminal trials
- 16/07/2013 01:52:00 PM
765 Views
when the president gets involved it is safe to polotics are at play.
- 16/07/2013 06:23:54 PM
818 Views
That's not an unfair remark but it justifies criticizing him, not also getting involved in the case
- 16/07/2013 06:59:53 PM
831 Views
When a case shows glaring holes in the law, it should by nature cause those laws to be reconsidered
- 16/07/2013 07:18:57 PM
925 Views
I'm not sure what those 'glaring holes' are, but a specific person shouldn't be needed to show them
- 16/07/2013 08:18:38 PM
824 Views
To assist you with Isaac's request, here is the link to the Laws in Florida
- 16/07/2013 08:23:14 PM
848 Views
It is a bit difficult to not use the case when the specificity of the case is the problem....
- 16/07/2013 11:06:59 PM
893 Views
I sympathize with that but I think it remains a moral necessity to do so
- 17/07/2013 12:14:39 AM
957 Views
Re: I sympathize with that but I think it remains a moral necessity to do so
- 17/07/2013 05:29:56 PM
958 Views
You are asking for what already exists, and are/were in force at the time.
- 17/07/2013 06:33:54 PM
958 Views
I think you've over-personalized this case
- 17/07/2013 08:00:50 PM
877 Views
I think this case is simply the closest example at hand of a perceived lack of justice
- 17/07/2013 10:34:38 PM
933 Views
Re: I think this case is simply the closest example at hand of a perceived lack of justice
- 18/07/2013 01:39:17 AM
1071 Views
Jury Instruction 3 - w/ link to pdf of model FL jury instruction for all criminal cases
- 18/07/2013 09:51:47 PM
853 Views
Your logical error is failing to realize that me following you does NOT meet the statutes
- 17/07/2013 04:01:52 AM
848 Views
Why do you insist on stating things that have been demonstrated to be false?
- 16/07/2013 08:19:08 PM
638 Views
Well said.
- 17/07/2013 02:25:36 PM
976 Views
it is possible to discuss a case based on what the evidence shows
- 17/07/2013 06:03:05 PM
966 Views
Of course it is possible, one just fails to see how it can serve any good end
- 17/07/2013 09:43:02 PM
831 Views
That just brings us full circle to my orignal reply to you
- 18/07/2013 02:52:15 AM
867 Views
Re: That just brings us full circle to my orignal reply to you
- 18/07/2013 04:09:51 AM
982 Views
are agree with your general concept
- 18/07/2013 05:20:41 PM
1106 Views
My concern all along has been what the laws actually are, and to clear the air of the BS.
- 18/07/2013 06:06:21 PM
839 Views
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/frame_game/2013/07/trayvon_martin_verdict_racism_hat
- 18/07/2013 02:04:36 AM
915 Views
Perhaps one day black people will have the same rights as whites in the US
- 15/07/2013 05:30:00 PM
967 Views
Congratulations on making one of the dumbest statemets of the year. *NM*
- 15/07/2013 09:00:46 PM
565 Views
You have tried retroatcively making Martin a criminal here, despite him doing nothing wrong
- 15/07/2013 10:52:32 PM
853 Views
I really shouldn't bother but I will try one more time to introduce you to rational thought.
- 16/07/2013 05:31:12 AM
746 Views
So you support attacking creepy crackers who you think are following you?
- 16/07/2013 12:56:52 PM
848 Views
The law suggests that if I fear for my safety, I am justified in attacking first in self-defense
- 18/07/2013 11:00:58 PM
920 Views
there is zero evidience to support that assumption
- 19/07/2013 04:25:15 AM
785 Views
There is zero evidence to support Zimmerman's version of their initial encounter
- 19/07/2013 09:32:24 PM
856 Views
Sorry but you have your facts wrong Martin was identified as the person top
- 20/07/2013 01:32:00 AM
797 Views
Let's see - Martin was using drugs.....
- 16/07/2013 04:56:13 PM
842 Views
Funny how black victims are rare enough to be famous.
- 19/07/2013 12:24:12 PM
780 Views
Please cite the legal statutes Trayvon Martin violated before Zimmerman approached him
- 19/07/2013 10:24:59 PM
882 Views
Do you have any actual facts to prove Zimmerman mad his story or is it pure bias?
- 20/07/2013 04:21:55 PM
840 Views