Active Users:1138 Time:22/11/2024 08:16:15 PM
Re: And THAT is the scary precendent this case sets for the populace Cannoli Send a noteboard - 14/07/2013 07:32:26 PM

View original post
That it is totally fine to profile someone (hey, I see a white man 60 years old or so, he MUST BE A RACIST REPUBLICAN, which means a threat to not just my neighborhood by my whole country), and then to follow them, provoke them and hey, shoot them.

Hope you racist republicans are happy. Now you are all invading our neighborhoods, and we can do something about it.

See ya on your walk!


If a white teen was killed walking through a black neighborhood, the shooter might go to trial (assuming anyone would cooperate with the police), but everyone else would be saying "what was he thinking, walking through that neighborhood at night?" Your pitifully implied threat of retaliation or escalation is not really a threat because that's what working class whites have been living with for decades. Every major case of racial violence in the last thirty or forty years has either been perpetrated by a racial minority and the racial aspects largely ignored (aside from harping about the audacity of the system to arrest a black man and implying racism could be the only motive for his arrest), or has been ginned up into a racial issue from nothing, or has been an absolute hoax and/or a case of misconduct on the part of the prosecution (as in this case and the Duke case a couple years back). The only real fear whites have of blacks is getting railroaded should we ever find ourselves in honest opposition to one, or compelled to defend ourselves from the race that perpetrates the overwhelming majority of interracial violence and property loss and 99.999999% of the interracial rapes.

The "racist republican" myth is getting old, as the Klu Klux Klan was the militant wing of the Democratic party for generations, while the NRA has had black members from its earliest inception, and elected ALL of the black officials until FDR started buying off black leaders in the 40s. The only man to vote against the confirmation of BOTH black supreme court justices, was Robert Byrd, a lifelong Democrat. Bill Clinton's friends and mentors included notorious segregationists Orville Fabus & William Fulbright, and Republican heroes like Joe McCarthy and Richard Nixon faced the wrath of the segregationists as much as the northeastern limousine liberal establishment. When Democrats were blocking schoolhouse doors, the Republicans were nominating integrationists like Goldwater, Nixon & Agnew. When FDR was sending the Japanese to concentration camps and putting Klansmen on the Supreme Court, the Republican party platform called for anti-lynching laws and opposed the poll taxes the Democrats used to maintain Jim Crow. Unlike the President or his racist pastor, Republican Supreme Court Justice Thomas DID experience that sort of discrimination.

Given your loose association with facts of all kinds, your position vis a vis this trial is rather easy to understand.


**To be clear, I do not now, or ever plan to, own a gun. Guns are for the chicken shit cowards who can't resolve a problem without one. Guns are for the weakest (both physically and mentally) among us, like George Zimmerman, and I'm better than that. Unlike the majority of the gun freaks in this country.
Then STFU, until you have walked in his shoes. You call him the weakest physically, but that is exactly who should have guns, to prevent the physically strong from dominating them. Your hysterical post pretty much undermines anything you have to say on the mental state of a man you've never met.
Cannoli
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Zimmerman = Not Guilty - 14/07/2013 04:04:07 AM 1778 Views
Any charge, other than stupidity, was rediculous. *NM* - 14/07/2013 04:24:09 AM 503 Views
Stupidity+Death= Manslaughter *NM* - 14/07/2013 05:27:39 AM 474 Views
But hey... - 14/07/2013 05:35:11 AM 1000 Views
And THAT is the scary precendent this case sets for the populace - 14/07/2013 05:28:03 PM 1131 Views
Oh puhleeze... can you get any more rediculous? *NM* - 14/07/2013 07:22:52 PM 623 Views
HyogaRott baby, you are hurting me here. Can you please stop this? - 14/07/2013 11:29:00 PM 884 Views
If inline spellcheck doesn't catch it, I probably won't either. - 15/07/2013 06:29:29 AM 815 Views
Re: And THAT is the scary precendent this case sets for the populace - 14/07/2013 07:32:26 PM 931 Views
you really are small minded little bigot - 15/07/2013 03:57:01 AM 902 Views
+1 - Seriously has imlad always been this nuts? *NM* - 15/07/2013 04:32:33 AM 537 Views
Your reply is partisan and obnoxious. - 15/07/2013 02:15:13 PM 903 Views
So it was okay that he was on top of a guy, pounding his head into the pavement? - 14/07/2013 06:45:17 PM 906 Views
If you can believe Zimmerman's side of the story is 100% truth, I have a bridge for sale... - 15/07/2013 05:35:08 PM 1004 Views
do you have actual evidence to support zimmerman lied? *NM* - 16/07/2013 05:43:42 PM 503 Views
Sure - 16/07/2013 06:49:20 PM 788 Views
Re: Sure - 16/07/2013 07:53:27 PM 948 Views
Re: Sure - 16/07/2013 10:07:13 PM 987 Views
Re: Sure - 17/07/2013 03:26:15 AM 926 Views
The kid decided to beat a man who had a gun and got shot for it - 15/07/2013 03:46:38 AM 882 Views
In a sane world, here is how their interaction plays out - 15/07/2013 05:44:26 PM 846 Views
Yes. And the fact that he didn't simply ask him what he was doing, tells me he was racial profiling - 15/07/2013 08:59:41 PM 838 Views
The only way that statement makes sense is if it is sarcasm - 16/07/2013 12:46:59 PM 789 Views
And tomorrow I get to preach about the Good Samaritan. - 14/07/2013 05:26:50 AM 1066 Views
Where's your forgiveness?? Judge not lest ye be judged. - 14/07/2013 07:10:14 PM 831 Views
Did I say a thing about Zimmerman? No. - 14/07/2013 08:44:26 PM 969 Views
Oh my gosh. I'm so sorry. Which neighborhood watch were you referring to? - 15/07/2013 12:46:44 AM 931 Views
Float your concept of grace in front of your priest sometime. - 15/07/2013 04:31:34 AM 802 Views
Danny... - 15/07/2013 01:32:03 PM 898 Views
You'd think the rain of venom in here would make everyone's soapbox too slippery to stand on - 15/07/2013 01:05:41 PM 846 Views
+1 *NM* - 15/07/2013 06:40:15 PM 558 Views
would that be true for most of politics as well? *NM* - 16/07/2013 12:58:33 PM 523 Views
Depends on the case, but those aren't individual life and death criminal trials - 16/07/2013 01:52:00 PM 765 Views
when the president gets involved it is safe to polotics are at play. - 16/07/2013 06:23:54 PM 819 Views
That's not an unfair remark but it justifies criticizing him, not also getting involved in the case - 16/07/2013 06:59:53 PM 831 Views
When a case shows glaring holes in the law, it should by nature cause those laws to be reconsidered - 16/07/2013 07:18:57 PM 925 Views
I'm not sure what those 'glaring holes' are, but a specific person shouldn't be needed to show them - 16/07/2013 08:18:38 PM 824 Views
It is a bit difficult to not use the case when the specificity of the case is the problem.... - 16/07/2013 11:06:59 PM 894 Views
I sympathize with that but I think it remains a moral necessity to do so - 17/07/2013 12:14:39 AM 958 Views
Re: I sympathize with that but I think it remains a moral necessity to do so - 17/07/2013 05:29:56 PM 958 Views
I think you've over-personalized this case - 17/07/2013 08:00:50 PM 879 Views
I think this case is simply the closest example at hand of a perceived lack of justice - 17/07/2013 10:34:38 PM 933 Views
Re: I think this case is simply the closest example at hand of a perceived lack of justice - 18/07/2013 01:39:17 AM 1072 Views
Jury instructions - 18/07/2013 04:12:29 AM 1024 Views
Jury Instructions 2 - 18/07/2013 06:22:33 PM 882 Views
I just want to comment on two points from your reply - 19/07/2013 09:47:06 PM 786 Views
I'm pretty throughly exhausted of this - 19/07/2013 10:46:22 PM 891 Views
Nice. - 16/07/2013 09:01:50 PM 976 Views
Thanks - 16/07/2013 09:48:00 PM 812 Views
Well said. - 17/07/2013 02:25:36 PM 976 Views
it is possible to discuss a case based on what the evidence shows - 17/07/2013 06:03:05 PM 967 Views
Of course it is possible, one just fails to see how it can serve any good end - 17/07/2013 09:43:02 PM 832 Views
Exactly. *NM* - 18/07/2013 02:08:25 AM 588 Views
That just brings us full circle to my orignal reply to you - 18/07/2013 02:52:15 AM 869 Views
Re: That just brings us full circle to my orignal reply to you - 18/07/2013 04:09:51 AM 982 Views
are agree with your general concept - 18/07/2013 05:20:41 PM 1107 Views
Good. - 15/07/2013 02:11:12 PM 800 Views
Perhaps one day black people will have the same rights as whites in the US - 15/07/2013 05:30:00 PM 968 Views
Congratulations on making one of the dumbest statemets of the year. *NM* - 15/07/2013 09:00:46 PM 565 Views
You have tried retroatcively making Martin a criminal here, despite him doing nothing wrong - 15/07/2013 10:52:32 PM 854 Views
So you support attacking creepy crackers who you think are following you? - 16/07/2013 12:56:52 PM 849 Views
The law suggests that if I fear for my safety, I am justified in attacking first in self-defense - 18/07/2013 11:00:58 PM 922 Views
there is zero evidience to support that assumption - 19/07/2013 04:25:15 AM 785 Views
Let's see - Martin was using drugs..... - 16/07/2013 04:56:13 PM 843 Views
Does that mean he should have been hunted down and shot? *NM* - 16/07/2013 05:22:43 PM 515 Views
He wasn't, so your question is irrelevant. - 16/07/2013 05:37:27 PM 768 Views

Reply to Message