Active Users:1214 Time:22/11/2024 08:31:41 PM
So it was okay that he was on top of a guy, pounding his head into the pavement? Cannoli Send a noteboard - 14/07/2013 06:45:17 PM

View original post
If someone should happen to follow Zimmerman around with a gun, provoke him, chase him, and otherwise harass him until he retaliates, they now have legal precedent to kill him in self-defense, right? You can't prove any racial reasoning.

Yeah, self-defense is what you call it when a guy four inches taller in on top of you, beating you to death. What about John White, who walked out of his securely locked house to confront a bunch of kids making noise, even though he knew the cops were on their way? Not one kid laid a finger on him, but when he shot and killed one, he was only faced with gun charges, and pardoned of those charges as soon as his state got a governor the same race as he. The difference was, John White was black and, in a highly typical case of interracial homicide, shot a white child, so there was no racial outcry. President Bush did not point out that if he had a son, he'd look like John White's victim (and if Barack Obama had another daughter, she'd look a lot like that Jenteal idiot; she'd certainly be just as racist, given her father's propensity for interjecting himself into local scuffles on the side of the black man and her mother's thesis topic at Princeton), and every one seemed to be pretty much on the side of the homeowner getting harassed by punks. Even though said homeowner had no need to take a gun and leave his house to confront the kids.

As for the stupidity of Zimmerman, he WAS a neighborhood watch guy. There HAD been a rash of crimes in the neighborhood by black perpetrators (of which Zimmerman had been one of the victims), and at least one had been caught by concerned citizens tailing him. If Trayvon Martin had a right to be walking where he was, so did Zimmerman, who LIVED there. We don't know what happened in their confrontation, but unless you are going to presume some sort of insane scenario where Zimmerman was baiting Martin into attacking him so he could shoot, there is no logical or reasonable way you can justify Martin doing something to cause wounds to the back of Zimmerman's head.

Cannoli
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Zimmerman = Not Guilty - 14/07/2013 04:04:07 AM 1779 Views
Any charge, other than stupidity, was rediculous. *NM* - 14/07/2013 04:24:09 AM 503 Views
Stupidity+Death= Manslaughter *NM* - 14/07/2013 05:27:39 AM 474 Views
But hey... - 14/07/2013 05:35:11 AM 1001 Views
And THAT is the scary precendent this case sets for the populace - 14/07/2013 05:28:03 PM 1131 Views
Oh puhleeze... can you get any more rediculous? *NM* - 14/07/2013 07:22:52 PM 623 Views
HyogaRott baby, you are hurting me here. Can you please stop this? - 14/07/2013 11:29:00 PM 885 Views
If inline spellcheck doesn't catch it, I probably won't either. - 15/07/2013 06:29:29 AM 815 Views
you really are small minded little bigot - 15/07/2013 03:57:01 AM 903 Views
+1 - Seriously has imlad always been this nuts? *NM* - 15/07/2013 04:32:33 AM 537 Views
Your reply is partisan and obnoxious. - 15/07/2013 02:15:13 PM 905 Views
So it was okay that he was on top of a guy, pounding his head into the pavement? - 14/07/2013 06:45:17 PM 907 Views
If you can believe Zimmerman's side of the story is 100% truth, I have a bridge for sale... - 15/07/2013 05:35:08 PM 1005 Views
do you have actual evidence to support zimmerman lied? *NM* - 16/07/2013 05:43:42 PM 503 Views
Sure - 16/07/2013 06:49:20 PM 789 Views
Re: Sure - 16/07/2013 07:53:27 PM 948 Views
Re: Sure - 16/07/2013 10:07:13 PM 988 Views
Re: Sure - 17/07/2013 03:26:15 AM 926 Views
The kid decided to beat a man who had a gun and got shot for it - 15/07/2013 03:46:38 AM 882 Views
In a sane world, here is how their interaction plays out - 15/07/2013 05:44:26 PM 846 Views
Yes. And the fact that he didn't simply ask him what he was doing, tells me he was racial profiling - 15/07/2013 08:59:41 PM 838 Views
The only way that statement makes sense is if it is sarcasm - 16/07/2013 12:46:59 PM 790 Views
And tomorrow I get to preach about the Good Samaritan. - 14/07/2013 05:26:50 AM 1067 Views
Where's your forgiveness?? Judge not lest ye be judged. - 14/07/2013 07:10:14 PM 831 Views
Did I say a thing about Zimmerman? No. - 14/07/2013 08:44:26 PM 969 Views
Oh my gosh. I'm so sorry. Which neighborhood watch were you referring to? - 15/07/2013 12:46:44 AM 931 Views
Float your concept of grace in front of your priest sometime. - 15/07/2013 04:31:34 AM 802 Views
Danny... - 15/07/2013 01:32:03 PM 899 Views
You'd think the rain of venom in here would make everyone's soapbox too slippery to stand on - 15/07/2013 01:05:41 PM 846 Views
+1 *NM* - 15/07/2013 06:40:15 PM 558 Views
would that be true for most of politics as well? *NM* - 16/07/2013 12:58:33 PM 523 Views
Depends on the case, but those aren't individual life and death criminal trials - 16/07/2013 01:52:00 PM 765 Views
when the president gets involved it is safe to polotics are at play. - 16/07/2013 06:23:54 PM 820 Views
That's not an unfair remark but it justifies criticizing him, not also getting involved in the case - 16/07/2013 06:59:53 PM 832 Views
When a case shows glaring holes in the law, it should by nature cause those laws to be reconsidered - 16/07/2013 07:18:57 PM 925 Views
I'm not sure what those 'glaring holes' are, but a specific person shouldn't be needed to show them - 16/07/2013 08:18:38 PM 824 Views
It is a bit difficult to not use the case when the specificity of the case is the problem.... - 16/07/2013 11:06:59 PM 895 Views
I sympathize with that but I think it remains a moral necessity to do so - 17/07/2013 12:14:39 AM 959 Views
Re: I sympathize with that but I think it remains a moral necessity to do so - 17/07/2013 05:29:56 PM 958 Views
I think you've over-personalized this case - 17/07/2013 08:00:50 PM 879 Views
I think this case is simply the closest example at hand of a perceived lack of justice - 17/07/2013 10:34:38 PM 933 Views
Re: I think this case is simply the closest example at hand of a perceived lack of justice - 18/07/2013 01:39:17 AM 1073 Views
Jury instructions - 18/07/2013 04:12:29 AM 1024 Views
Jury Instructions 2 - 18/07/2013 06:22:33 PM 882 Views
I just want to comment on two points from your reply - 19/07/2013 09:47:06 PM 788 Views
I'm pretty throughly exhausted of this - 19/07/2013 10:46:22 PM 892 Views
Nice. - 16/07/2013 09:01:50 PM 977 Views
Thanks - 16/07/2013 09:48:00 PM 812 Views
Well said. - 17/07/2013 02:25:36 PM 977 Views
it is possible to discuss a case based on what the evidence shows - 17/07/2013 06:03:05 PM 967 Views
Of course it is possible, one just fails to see how it can serve any good end - 17/07/2013 09:43:02 PM 833 Views
Exactly. *NM* - 18/07/2013 02:08:25 AM 588 Views
That just brings us full circle to my orignal reply to you - 18/07/2013 02:52:15 AM 869 Views
Re: That just brings us full circle to my orignal reply to you - 18/07/2013 04:09:51 AM 983 Views
are agree with your general concept - 18/07/2013 05:20:41 PM 1107 Views
Good. - 15/07/2013 02:11:12 PM 800 Views
Perhaps one day black people will have the same rights as whites in the US - 15/07/2013 05:30:00 PM 968 Views
Congratulations on making one of the dumbest statemets of the year. *NM* - 15/07/2013 09:00:46 PM 565 Views
You have tried retroatcively making Martin a criminal here, despite him doing nothing wrong - 15/07/2013 10:52:32 PM 855 Views
So you support attacking creepy crackers who you think are following you? - 16/07/2013 12:56:52 PM 850 Views
The law suggests that if I fear for my safety, I am justified in attacking first in self-defense - 18/07/2013 11:00:58 PM 922 Views
there is zero evidience to support that assumption - 19/07/2013 04:25:15 AM 785 Views
Let's see - Martin was using drugs..... - 16/07/2013 04:56:13 PM 843 Views
Does that mean he should have been hunted down and shot? *NM* - 16/07/2013 05:22:43 PM 515 Views
He wasn't, so your question is irrelevant. - 16/07/2013 05:37:27 PM 769 Views

Reply to Message