Active Users:1213 Time:22/11/2024 08:35:11 PM
So is your post. Ghavrel Send a noteboard - 28/04/2013 08:41:16 AM

You're right; the sentence in question adheres to grammatical convention sufficiently to be legible. It is, however, incredibly absurd to say that the Founding Fathers would have opposed background checks because they go against the presumption of innocence in criminal affairs.

You do tone argument a lot, and you do it rather well, but it's a rather silly approach when it's all you ever do. And it's rapidly approaching all you ever do in your replies to me.

"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla

Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel

*MySmiley*

Reply to message
Just to be clear... - 20/04/2013 03:32:07 AM 1090 Views
Of course it is - 20/04/2013 04:18:27 AM 518 Views
But, they is us - 23/04/2013 03:13:27 AM 682 Views
First of all, I don't believe that 90% of the population support it - 23/04/2013 04:55:02 AM 719 Views
Just to be clear it is possible to support freedom of the press &support censorship of the internet - 20/04/2013 05:03:26 AM 642 Views
ROFL *NM* - 20/04/2013 05:21:11 AM 275 Views
Bazinga! Well done..... *NM* - 21/04/2013 03:24:34 PM 272 Views
Well played - 23/04/2013 03:20:34 AM 783 Views
No you really can't - 23/04/2013 05:59:04 PM 679 Views
That's the most amusingly incomprehensible attempt at constitutional analysis I've read in a while. *NM* - 26/04/2013 10:47:18 AM 272 Views
How so? It made sense to me - 26/04/2013 03:10:11 PM 522 Views
Presumption of innocence isn't part of the constitution. - 26/04/2013 09:30:17 PM 554 Views
I think that's being a bit pedantic, to be kind - 26/04/2013 11:13:33 PM 765 Views
So is your post. - 28/04/2013 08:41:16 AM 537 Views
I'm not sure how - 28/04/2013 02:46:00 PM 605 Views
I am not trying to pick a fight with you or anyone else. I'm very curious. - 29/04/2013 02:34:19 PM 577 Views
yes *NM* - 20/04/2013 06:26:27 AM 346 Views
Same. Willing to hear counterarguments, though. *NM* - 21/04/2013 02:59:33 PM 330 Views
about 90% of the country agrees with that but still Obama can't close the deal. - 21/04/2013 04:24:15 PM 750 Views
Yep - 23/04/2013 03:47:12 AM 756 Views
90% also believes constanly blaiming others for your own failure is a sign of weakness - 23/04/2013 04:55:53 AM 635 Views
You're smarter than this - 23/04/2013 06:41:09 AM 538 Views
but is wasn't heavily favored it just polls well - 24/04/2013 05:56:41 PM 634 Views
..and that is where the misinformation comes into play - 24/04/2013 07:35:51 PM 589 Views
And that reply makes my point - 26/04/2013 05:49:53 PM 660 Views
And that reply makes my point - 26/04/2013 05:49:53 PM 665 Views
I wonder which other Constitutional rights should require a background check to excercise? *NM* - 22/04/2013 08:56:15 PM 240 Views
How about just the ones that can have potentially lethal consequences for other citizens? - 23/04/2013 03:56:25 AM 652 Views
freedom os speech can be a dangerous thing - 23/04/2013 04:58:02 AM 566 Views
As you know - 28/04/2013 12:11:04 PM 625 Views
Why yes, yes I do... - 23/04/2013 05:43:29 PM 670 Views
I agree - 28/04/2013 12:55:13 PM 741 Views
Re: I agree - 05/05/2013 11:24:37 AM 629 Views
Just to be clear: another hypocrisy of the right wing - 04/05/2013 06:37:31 PM 768 Views
When posting into dead threads it helps to A) Be on topic or B) Make intelligent points - 04/05/2013 08:08:46 PM 4820 Views
That's not true at all. - 05/05/2013 09:45:17 AM 516 Views
*I* have a complex about dead threads? - 05/05/2013 10:36:15 AM 634 Views

Reply to Message