Active Users:1179 Time:23/11/2024 02:56:24 AM
Deficits are a big deal with times are good Roland00 Send a noteboard - 07/04/2013 03:40:36 AM

Deficits are a big deal with times are good, you worry less about them when times are bad.

We need to start worrying about deficits when your debt to gdp ratio is at 100% or more

------

You do not worry about deficits when you are worried about deflation. If you try to fight deficits too soon you make the problem worse as evidenced by Japan and the lost decade.

Reply to message
President Obama and Defense Secretary Hagel take pay cuts to lessen impact of sequester - 03/04/2013 09:47:45 PM 725 Views
The sequester was Obama's idea, so he should CYA. - 04/04/2013 12:16:59 AM 531 Views
The US economony only lost 3.1 percent between 2008 to 2009 - 04/04/2013 03:55:05 AM 563 Views
We do need to cut, cut, cut... - 10/04/2013 03:38:45 PM 661 Views
I don't care about any quantities under a million - 04/04/2013 03:40:25 AM 492 Views
the president can't pass a budget you know.... - 04/04/2013 04:45:38 AM 502 Views
No, but he is required by law to submit one, and he has not. - 05/04/2013 06:10:24 PM 526 Views
good job getting your analysis from right wing media and pushing the lies they tell you - 05/04/2013 07:04:05 PM 652 Views
good job on displaying more of your ignorance or willful blindness - 06/04/2013 03:34:27 PM 513 Views
quoting from the second article you linked..... - 06/04/2013 04:23:48 PM 478 Views
*SIGH* - 07/04/2013 12:58:12 AM 560 Views
They need to cut hundreds of billions, not millions; and not over a fake 10 year period either. *NM* - 05/04/2013 06:13:37 PM 250 Views
Yes we need to cut hundreds of billions of dollars - 06/04/2013 03:17:01 AM 487 Views
Not really - 06/04/2013 03:54:56 PM 487 Views
as long as debt and/or deficit is less than GDP they are manageable - 06/04/2013 04:30:42 PM 617 Views
Deficits - 07/04/2013 01:13:41 AM 482 Views
Deficits are a big deal with times are good - 07/04/2013 03:40:36 AM 498 Views
Re: Not really - 07/04/2013 03:29:59 AM 767 Views

Reply to Message