The sequester was Obama's idea, so he should CYA.
Anonymous2000 Send a noteboard - 04/04/2013 12:16:59 AM
But in reality, the Dems are terrified. The US public is learning that these very modest cuts have no impact on the nation. As such, we need to cut, cut, cut more!
President Obama and Defense Secretary Hagel take pay cuts to lessen impact of sequester
- 03/04/2013 09:47:45 PM
725 Views
Well, it's more of a CYA-against-bad-press symbolic gesture than an impressive one.
- 03/04/2013 10:15:40 PM
614 Views
considering that nobody in Congress is losing pay or their job, it's a good precedent IMHO
- 03/04/2013 10:43:45 PM
467 Views
The sequester was Obama's idea, so he should CYA.
- 04/04/2013 12:16:59 AM
532 Views
I don't care about any quantities under a million
- 04/04/2013 03:40:25 AM
492 Views
the president can't pass a budget you know.... 
- 04/04/2013 04:45:38 AM
503 Views
- 04/04/2013 04:45:38 AM
503 Views
No, but he is required by law to submit one, and he has not.
- 05/04/2013 06:10:24 PM
526 Views
good job getting your analysis from right wing media and pushing the lies they tell you
- 05/04/2013 07:04:05 PM
652 Views
good job on displaying more of your ignorance or willful blindness
- 06/04/2013 03:34:27 PM
514 Views
They need to cut hundreds of billions, not millions; and not over a fake 10 year period either. *NM*
- 05/04/2013 06:13:37 PM
250 Views
yes, because everyone knows the way out of recession is to prevent job creation 
*NM*
- 05/04/2013 07:04:49 PM
261 Views
*NM*
- 05/04/2013 07:04:49 PM
261 Views
Federal spending can not create real, sustainable, job growth. *NM*
- 06/04/2013 03:39:52 PM
288 Views
it doesn't have to, that's why they call it "stimulus" *NM*
- 06/04/2013 04:08:04 PM
276 Views
Yeah, and I can call your mama, your daddy, but it don't change who they are. *NM*
- 07/04/2013 01:15:05 AM
259 Views
Yes we need to cut hundreds of billions of dollars
- 06/04/2013 03:17:01 AM
487 Views
Not really
- 06/04/2013 03:54:56 PM
488 Views
as long as debt and/or deficit is less than GDP they are manageable
- 06/04/2013 04:30:42 PM
618 Views
You do know why we use 10 year time periods with cbo numbers right? *NM*
- 06/04/2013 03:17:41 AM
267 Views
Yeah, so they can claim a dime of imaginary savings is a dollar. *NM*
- 06/04/2013 03:37:39 PM
247 Views
No anything past 10 years in projections are a joke.
- 07/04/2013 03:02:32 AM
547 Views
Anything past 1 year is a joke/lie becuase the next Congrees will do what it wants regardless. *NM*
- 07/04/2013 03:08:39 PM
279 Views
Ya know, semi-tangent but I just had an amusing notion about elected official pay
- 10/04/2013 07:12:56 PM
554 Views
it would require a constitutional amendment, but i think we could get it to pass.... *NM*
- 10/04/2013 11:24:26 PM
266 Views