Active Users:1208 Time:22/11/2024 08:27:56 PM
Tactical question: Better by daylight to aid evacuation, or night to avoid detection? Joel Send a noteboard - 11/03/2013 06:48:21 PM

View original postPersonally I basically agree. Coordinate a preemptive strike with nothing but the troops and readiness we can get going with a minimum risk of giving it away and just hit them first. Time it when everyone is awake and give the shelter/evac order at the last moment, maybe 20-30 minutes before actual fire begins at the soonest. As I said originally, I think we're delaying the inevitable and every year raises the cost.

This is where I have been for a while; one of my big complaints in 2003 was "instead of the guy who MIGHT have nuks that CANNOT hit us, why not go after the guy who DEFINITELY has nukes that CAN?" So, since I take it for granted satellites have given us a pretty good idea of where most stationary North Korean artillery is, do you think it would be better to do a daytime evac/shelter at the risk of tipping our hand and giving them the first shot, or send in stealth fighters and bombers by night and hope we can wipe out most of the artillery before they can start firing? Which would cause the least South Korean devastation?

I know they will get far too many rounds off either way, but something akin to the Battle of Inchon might convince North Korea that shelling South Korea and the DMZ while US forces poured into the country elsewhere is a waste of scanty and desperately needed material. It would not prevent (and might hasten) their defeat, while ensuring the final peace were far more vindictive, and make the political deterrence to Chinese aid that much greater.

Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
North Korea Withdraws from Korean War Armistice - 08/03/2013 10:39:44 PM 1284 Views
Again? Didn't they "tear up the armistice" a few years ago? - 08/03/2013 10:49:59 PM 579 Views
They said they were "no longer obligated" after the second nuke test, and would resist attacks. - 09/03/2013 10:16:17 PM 675 Views
Not to diminish the role of China in this but you're bypassing the actual issue - 09/03/2013 11:26:18 PM 609 Views
I would like it noted I responded to you before you responded to me. - 09/03/2013 11:40:18 PM 700 Views
Duly noted - 10/03/2013 01:03:59 AM 693 Views
Re: Duly noted - 11/03/2013 06:14:59 PM 625 Views
Re: Duly noted - 11/03/2013 07:05:17 PM 668 Views
Re: Duly noted - 11/03/2013 10:34:36 PM 566 Views
Re: Duly noted - 12/03/2013 02:04:05 AM 663 Views
One word: evacuation. - 10/03/2013 03:22:42 AM 559 Views
Time constraints - 10/03/2013 04:37:51 AM 694 Views
NK artillery myth - 10/03/2013 03:59:36 PM 718 Views
Seoul isn't the only urban location, refering to it simply saves time - 10/03/2013 04:38:40 PM 647 Views
Well, but one would assume that after an initial salvo the South Koreans would counterstrike. - 10/03/2013 06:51:34 PM 623 Views
Definitely, but you still get a high civilian body toll - 10/03/2013 08:14:26 PM 625 Views
Tactical question: Better by daylight to aid evacuation, or night to avoid detection? - 11/03/2013 06:48:21 PM 653 Views
Daylight, hands down I think - 11/03/2013 07:22:26 PM 617 Views

Reply to Message