This is where I have been for a while; one of my big complaints in 2003 was "instead of the guy who MIGHT have nuks that CANNOT hit us, why not go after the guy who DEFINITELY has nukes that CAN?" So, since I take it for granted satellites have given us a pretty good idea of where most stationary North Korean artillery is, do you think it would be better to do a daytime evac/shelter at the risk of tipping our hand and giving them the first shot, or send in stealth fighters and bombers by night and hope we can wipe out most of the artillery before they can start firing? Which would cause the least South Korean devastation?
I know they will get far too many rounds off either way, but something akin to the Battle of Inchon might convince North Korea that shelling South Korea and the DMZ while US forces poured into the country elsewhere is a waste of scanty and desperately needed material. It would not prevent (and might hasten) their defeat, while ensuring the final peace were far more vindictive, and make the political deterrence to Chinese aid that much greater.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.