Community Messageboard: The excessive regulation is on coal use, not production. by HyogaRott

Rules

The excessive regulation is on coal use, not production. HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 21/02/2013 05:00:28 PM

Like the last rounds of regulation that passed the senate last year that cost many millions to be implemented, but offer almost no gain.

Coal - One of the Cleanest Energy Sources in the World! Anonymous2000 - 20/02/2013 09:41:02 PM 1095 Views

This could mean great news for me personally Timthetrolloc - 20/02/2013 09:50:39 PM 775 Views

I wonder if it could work on other fuels? Isaac - 20/02/2013 10:18:08 PM 791 Views

Uh, not quite... HyogaRott - 21/02/2013 02:45:03 AM 661 Views

Do we also need our oceans to be 30% more acidic? *NM* Roland00 - 21/02/2013 03:40:19 AM 440 Views

But the CO2 levels in our atmosphere are 20% higher than 50 years ago Floffe - 21/02/2013 08:49:29 AM 882 Views

There's a certain irony to being criticized on this one from that sector Isaac - 21/02/2013 05:37:37 PM 855 Views

aplogies HyogaRott - 21/02/2013 09:58:46 PM 723 Views

No problem *NM* Isaac - 21/02/2013 10:47:10 PM 331 Views

It seems pretty dubious. It still produces CO2. Ghavrel - 21/02/2013 10:02:55 AM 668 Views

i can think of three uses for excess CO2 moondog - 21/02/2013 03:16:42 PM 756 Views

Every single one of those increases atmospheric carbon. Ghavrel - 22/02/2013 12:39:00 AM 677 Views

The technology is still a big improvement over current methods. Aemon - 21/02/2013 05:01:31 PM 683 Views

Oh, I agree. My point is just that sequestration will remain an issue. *NM* Ghavrel - 22/02/2013 12:39:25 AM 320 Views

Well dense CO2 is easier to get rid of Isaac - 21/02/2013 06:08:33 PM 650 Views

Interesting. Bergioyn - 21/02/2013 09:57:27 AM 657 Views

Probably too little, too late. Dannymac - 21/02/2013 04:09:45 PM 748 Views

The excessive regulation is on coal use, not production. HyogaRott - 21/02/2013 05:00:28 PM 699 Views

Nope. Dannymac - 25/02/2013 05:26:39 AM 650 Views

Rules

Reply to Message