Active Users:1207 Time:23/11/2024 07:06:59 AM
but doctors are *required* to buy malpractice insurance moondog Send a noteboard - 30/09/2009 04:13:08 PM
it's how much the malpractice insurance IS. Even for vets it's a reasonable chunk of change--I can't imagine what it is for doctors.

A doctor has to balance his expenses and income in order to eat, correct? Correct. If he has to pay malpractice, he raise his income which derives from his prices (thus his prices go up). The more malpractice is (and it's quite high), the more his prices need to go up (I'm assuming is other expenses are relatively fixed compared to "yes" and "no" malpractice). ECON101, dude.

And your comparison to car insurance makes zero sense, because the driver has nothing to do with setting the retail price of the car (beyond marketing influences). Logic. Fail.


so the car insurance analogy is pretty apt, since almost all states require the driver to carry it. i'm sure there are doctors who set their own prices out there, but for the most part the prices are set by the hospitals and HMOs, etc. i don't personally know any doctors, but the ones i've gone to don't set their own prices when i've asked them. their prices are set by the group they belong to.
"The RIAA has shown a certain disregard for the creative people of the industry in their eagerness to protect the revenues of the record companies." -- Frank Zappa

"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
Reply to message
Senate Finance Committee Votes Against Government-Run Health Insurance Plan - 29/09/2009 09:08:40 PM 766 Views
I just hope this doesn't squash all health-care reform attempts - 29/09/2009 09:12:15 PM 489 Views
It definitely needs work, but not scrapped..... - 29/09/2009 09:16:32 PM 494 Views
Polls are horrid evidence in my mind - 29/09/2009 09:32:58 PM 491 Views
Re: Polls are horrid evidence in my mind - 29/09/2009 10:12:26 PM 658 Views
From a government employee: Nice post *NM* - 29/09/2009 10:17:48 PM 205 Views
Not that I totally disagree with you, but that being said - 29/09/2009 10:29:13 PM 446 Views
Re: Not that I totally disagree with you, but that being said - 29/09/2009 11:21:21 PM 544 Views
the difference is the focus of the organizations - 29/09/2009 11:44:56 PM 523 Views
Re: the difference is the focus of the organizations - 30/09/2009 12:40:38 AM 552 Views
Difference is that the law is subject to more checks and balances than the whims of a CEO - 29/09/2009 11:44:58 PM 542 Views
Re: Difference is that the law is subject to more checks and balances than the whims of a CEO - 30/09/2009 12:28:36 AM 524 Views
that the private sector has a long history of abusing both customer and employee *NM* - 30/09/2009 03:46:03 AM 199 Views
That's indisbutable - 30/09/2009 05:55:45 PM 513 Views
And that's all I'm saying - 30/09/2009 07:08:04 PM 470 Views
Re: And that's all I'm saying - 01/10/2009 03:10:02 AM 505 Views
It doesn't work at all - 30/09/2009 04:27:44 AM 551 Views
i have yet to see any evidence of malpractice insurance being a driving cost of health care - 30/09/2009 05:27:34 AM 560 Views
it's not THAT they pay malpractice - 30/09/2009 02:00:04 PM 422 Views
but doctors are *required* to buy malpractice insurance - 30/09/2009 04:13:08 PM 472 Views
that's completely moot to the situation malpractice insurance causes. - 30/09/2009 04:21:42 PM 439 Views
hooray, we're going to continue in mediocrity when it comes to our health - 29/09/2009 10:15:00 PM 551 Views
Yes, it's comforting to see that we are only rated 37th... - 29/09/2009 11:14:33 PM 463 Views
That is a decade old and horribly discredited citation - 29/09/2009 11:46:51 PM 632 Views
regardless, we still spend a lot more on health care while having too many uncovered people - 29/09/2009 11:56:24 PM 463 Views
My objection, in this context, is strictly about references - 30/09/2009 12:13:40 AM 469 Views
i understand your point about the reference - 30/09/2009 12:54:25 AM 513 Views
Re: i understand your point about the reference - 30/09/2009 01:15:30 AM 570 Views
Re: i understand your point about the reference - 30/09/2009 12:24:45 PM 556 Views
Re: i understand your point about the reference - 30/09/2009 06:29:09 PM 547 Views
Re: i understand your point about the reference - 30/09/2009 10:57:36 PM 526 Views
Interesting... - 01/10/2009 12:09:35 AM 461 Views
So basically you are saying? - 01/10/2009 01:10:22 AM 427 Views
Basically... - 01/10/2009 02:52:51 AM 470 Views
Hooray! The government isn't going to get directly involved and make HC even worse! *NM* - 30/09/2009 01:03:50 AM 200 Views
yes, heaven forbid we take care of our own *NM* - 30/09/2009 04:13:50 PM 204 Views
looks l;ike they found some bipartisan spirit after all - 29/09/2009 10:35:55 PM 474 Views
Definitely wouldn't want to "denigrate" Health Care... - 30/09/2009 02:46:19 PM 432 Views

Reply to Message