Active Users:378 Time:04/04/2025 11:37:31 PM
Shouldn't you be able to answer this question from what you just wrote? Jeordam Send a noteboard - 13/02/2013 11:02:28 PM
Paul said, in one of his NT epistles, that he did not allow women authority in the Church. Yet GOD appointed Deborah a Judge, both spiritual and secular ruler of Israel, and when Josiah found the old copy of the Torah, it was the prophetess Huldah rather than Jermiah whom he asked what to do about it. So who is right, God, Whom scripture tells us made several women prophetess' and spiritual authorities, or Paul, who says in scripture said he did not allow women ANY spiritual authority? Typically, I tend to side with the OT prophets who DID represent their canonized words as divinely inspired over the NT apostle who just as explicitly stated—in scripture—that a number of his scriptural statements wree NOT divinely inspired.


"Paul said, in one of his NT epistles, that he did not allow women authority in the Church." Paul said that he wasn't into it. Paul didn't say that God wasn't into it. As you pointed out, God Himself (as it were) put Deborah in charge. Josiah, one of the good kings, asked Huldah what to do. We know full well that God gifts those whom He gifts. Deborah & Huldah obviously had the giftings from God, and the willingness in and of themselves to be obedient to what God had called them to do.

So how does Paul and his anti-women thing work in? *shrug* I'm not sure, but I'm sure that Paul got to discuss this with God at length. But it doesn't change the fact that God inspired Paul to put ink to paper in that exact way. Why? Maybe so we could discuss it...that we could dialogue about it...that we could learn a valueable lesson in the fact that Paul's personal opinions were his personal opinions (for whatever reason).

I'm a big believer that God gifts those whom He gifts. I fully acknowledge that there are those out there who have the <insert gift here> to do something, and that their willingness to do what God has gifted them to do should be the only factor. I certainly don't want to stand before God and say that I stood in the way of so and so because they weren't <insert physical trait here> enough.

~Jeordam
ex-Admin at wotmania (all things wot & art galleries)
Saving the Princess, Humanity, or the World-Entire since 1985
Reply to message
So the Pope has resigned - 11/02/2013 01:01:59 PM 1346 Views
Re: So the Pope has resigned - 11/02/2013 02:29:13 PM 764 Views
As a catholic, I am surprised, but please by the Pope's decision..... - 12/02/2013 03:05:34 AM 721 Views
Re: As a catholic, I am surprised, but please by the Pope's decision..... - 12/02/2013 09:21:30 PM 661 Views
One mistake in my original post..... - 13/02/2013 01:27:48 AM 666 Views
Re: As a catholic, I am surprised, but please by the Pope's decision..... - 13/02/2013 01:35:14 AM 632 Views
Re: As a catholic, I am surprised, but please by the Pope's decision..... - 13/02/2013 03:45:23 PM 712 Views
Luke or Paul? - 13/02/2013 04:36:27 PM 647 Views
That is what I get for only having decaf coffee this morning... - 13/02/2013 05:43:57 PM 715 Views
I'm gonna have to disagree with you on this point. - 13/02/2013 06:36:03 PM 551 Views
Re: I'm gonna have to disagree with you on this point. - 14/02/2013 11:12:34 PM 659 Views
Hate to jump you again but are you sure you mean Timothy? - 14/02/2013 11:54:00 PM 691 Views
Yep, I ment Timothy - 15/02/2013 04:18:21 AM 665 Views
Re: Yep, I ment Timothy - 15/02/2013 11:03:16 AM 654 Views
If "the bible is still the bible," then what of Deborah, Huldah and Phoebe, to name but a few? - 13/02/2013 06:17:44 PM 774 Views
Why wouldn't it still be devinely inspired? - 13/02/2013 06:44:07 PM 693 Views
Um, because then God was lying when He inspired someone to write "this is not Gods commandment." - 13/02/2013 07:42:15 PM 661 Views
You're missing a really key point - 13/02/2013 09:13:32 PM 719 Views
Let us take it full circle: The ecclesiastical authority of women - 13/02/2013 10:21:26 PM 736 Views
Shouldn't you be able to answer this question from what you just wrote? - 13/02/2013 11:02:28 PM 730 Views
So Roman Catholic priests CAN marry, under tortuous conditions? Interesting.... - 13/02/2013 03:40:48 PM 590 Views
A priest can't marry, but a married person can become a priest. - 13/02/2013 03:51:02 PM 628 Views
Heh, yeah, I guess I slightly mischaracterized what you were saying. - 13/02/2013 05:54:05 PM 720 Views
There are a bunch of semi-Catholic denominations that allow priests to marry. - 13/02/2013 06:06:13 PM 640 Views
That makes more sense. - 13/02/2013 06:23:36 PM 712 Views
Here's my chance. I'm putting in my application. - 11/02/2013 04:20:52 PM 816 Views
Unfortunately it matters due to the power he has... - 11/02/2013 04:42:25 PM 757 Views
You would like the Roman Catholic Church to do some good FOR ONCE?! - 11/02/2013 08:00:26 PM 827 Views
Well said. *NM* - 11/02/2013 10:55:18 PM 390 Views
You give them too much credit. - 11/02/2013 11:19:06 PM 781 Views
Put on blinders much? - 11/02/2013 11:50:01 PM 712 Views
I lol'd. *NM* - 11/02/2013 11:54:09 PM 362 Views
Grant me Chastity and Continence, But Not Yet! *NM* - 12/02/2013 03:35:26 AM 302 Views
Chastity: A Virtue best found in others *NM* - 12/02/2013 12:53:26 PM 311 Views
and continence too, apparently..... *NM* - 14/02/2013 12:18:22 AM 378 Views
Well said. - 13/02/2013 01:43:47 AM 619 Views
You really don't know how human psychology works, do you? - 13/02/2013 06:28:23 PM 673 Views
..and you don't get that it isn't what people will/may do, but what they should. - 15/02/2013 04:22:26 AM 872 Views
It's not religion, it's HIV or no HIV. - 15/02/2013 10:45:52 PM 653 Views
it's not HIV or no HIV, it is about what people should do. - 16/02/2013 07:02:36 PM 699 Views
Of course they don't have to teach people how to use condoms. - 17/02/2013 10:46:38 AM 637 Views
You're showing some glaring bias and hostility here - 12/02/2013 01:58:17 PM 621 Views
No, you are giving them far too little. - 13/02/2013 03:33:03 PM 640 Views
Oh, that. - 12/02/2013 03:04:42 PM 587 Views
That's such a load - 13/02/2013 01:39:45 AM 690 Views
Oops, I meant to reply here - As a catholic.....my take. - 12/02/2013 03:39:42 AM 751 Views
I'd say the chances are about as good... - 12/02/2013 03:48:29 PM 843 Views
So teh chances are excellent then! Good to know. - 12/02/2013 04:51:43 PM 676 Views
I doubt there's much of a chance of a real progressive. - 12/02/2013 06:38:14 PM 643 Views
IDK, two straight non-Italians? Will they put up with a 3rd? Has that even happened since Avignon? - 13/02/2013 01:46:28 AM 718 Views
Who says Benedict/Ratzinger is straight? - 13/02/2013 04:56:52 AM 629 Views
Don't think so, but the Italians will have to get used to it. - 13/02/2013 06:34:24 PM 631 Views
This will be a very interesting time. - 13/02/2013 06:27:41 PM 755 Views
He's retiring into a monastery in the Vatican, as I understand it. - 13/02/2013 06:42:14 PM 747 Views
Now this would be interesting.... - 13/02/2013 06:51:40 PM 712 Views
Right now I would settle for making up lost ground... - 14/02/2013 05:02:38 AM 619 Views
Pope Bene-victed... - 19/02/2013 07:56:17 AM 867 Views
Hurrah, Ras. I love a good pun or three. *NM* - 19/02/2013 01:55:11 PM 280 Views

Reply to Message