Active Users:1208 Time:22/11/2024 08:27:47 PM
I cited two in response to her, and those were just the ones I remember off the top of my head. Joel Send a noteboard - 28/12/2012 11:07:36 PM
I think I'm tempted to just automatically link that into all gun-control talks and refuse to discuss anything further till they've read it, because I really haven't seen let alone typed anything so logical, accurate, comprehensive, and well said on the subject. Thanks for the link.

I read it a week or two ago, so will continue. ;) A concealed carry instructor wrote a long blog post manipulating the historical record to justify unrestricted gun access, and people who already agreed with him say they still do: Wow. That does not make him accurate, Cicero or anything but a biased activist his fellows support.

It is a long piece, and I do not feel like digging through all of its tortured "logic" like I did a week or two ago; once was more than sufficient.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Poll: 54 percent view NRA favorably - 28/12/2012 04:23:35 AM 973 Views
Hahahaha. That is full of shit. OMG. Thanks for the laughs. *NM* - 28/12/2012 06:30:08 AM 407 Views
I have this to say about that... - 28/12/2012 07:10:52 AM 771 Views
That was rather long but probably one of the best things I've read this year - 28/12/2012 02:31:24 PM 549 Views
Excellent article by a knowledgable individual armed with facts. *NM* - 28/12/2012 04:36:23 PM 271 Views
See my response to Novo. - 28/12/2012 06:28:00 PM 640 Views
please cite the errors, manipulations, or lies. - 28/12/2012 09:30:28 PM 594 Views
I cited two in response to her, and those were just the ones I remember off the top of my head. - 28/12/2012 11:07:36 PM 725 Views
If you can't remember them, then don't claim them *NM* - 29/12/2012 03:08:08 AM 326 Views
Two just from memory is enough to substantiate my claim. - 29/12/2012 03:35:49 AM 613 Views
'Substantiate your claim'? I don't think you're lying, I just don't feel any reason to be swayed... - 29/12/2012 04:00:10 AM 514 Views
... and probably never will, but, alright, here we go: - 05/01/2013 06:53:23 PM 574 Views
Probably, but at least I'll listen - 05/01/2013 08:30:48 PM 619 Views
The 2 things you attempted to "cite" were absolute nonsense and proved nothing. - 31/12/2012 06:00:00 PM 584 Views
Was that response meant for me or Correia? - 05/01/2013 07:04:31 PM 554 Views
Great read, thanks for posting! *NM* - 28/12/2012 05:52:29 PM 278 Views
Thanks for posting that, I enjoyed it a lot - 29/12/2012 01:36:33 AM 559 Views
his premise is "there's already too many guns so why bother trying anything at all now" - 07/01/2013 06:27:20 PM 624 Views
I don't think that's his sole premise but it's also quite true - 07/01/2013 07:05:20 PM 653 Views
i think you're missing a piece of the puzzle - 07/01/2013 07:23:02 PM 576 Views
I'm not missing it, I just don't think it's wise or especially moral - 07/01/2013 09:36:05 PM 617 Views
moral has nothing to do with it, imho - 07/01/2013 11:26:00 PM 669 Views
Re: moral has nothing to do with it, imho - 08/01/2013 05:40:46 AM 533 Views
last thoughts..... - 08/01/2013 05:18:35 PM 556 Views
Well I was referring more to the timing of collecting data. - 29/12/2012 04:28:01 AM 747 Views
Is that the same Gallup that said 54% of America would vote Romney? - 28/12/2012 06:15:43 PM 677 Views
Once again data is data.....feel free to cite other polling data. *NM* - 28/12/2012 06:38:29 PM 288 Views

Reply to Message