Active Users:1221 Time:22/11/2024 03:43:49 PM
I am certain it would have been better, though not good, if she had been awake and shot him. Joel Send a noteboard - 27/12/2012 02:16:13 PM
Of course people can't defend themselves when they are asleep.
That's the problem with sleep. And guns don't solve that problem. They did not keep her safe.

My point being that just because no means of self-defense is flawless does not justify denying people the means of self-defense. That is like saying a single police officer so much as wounded by an assailant justifies taking away police guns and batons, that teaching them hand-to-hand self-defense is a waste of tax money and time, because that single injury "proves" all those self-defense means (each of which can and has been abused) ineffective. In fact, crimes and police excess still occur in every nation: Does that prove police forces themselves dangerous and ineffectual wastes of resources that should therefore be disbanded?

I'm sure it would have been better if she'd been awake and had a shoot out with her son?

I believe pretty much everyone but Adam Lanza thinks so, yes. Hell, he might also by this point.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
When guns are a big national issue, how do reporters & pundits not know facts about them? - 21/12/2012 05:33:14 PM 1539 Views
You don't hunt by walking into a classroom and shooting 20 deer - 21/12/2012 05:56:16 PM 994 Views
You're actually not right on that one - 21/12/2012 07:49:53 PM 922 Views
That wasn't the point I was making - 21/12/2012 09:49:40 PM 866 Views
You should probably clarify it then - 21/12/2012 10:47:26 PM 1023 Views
His post was perfectly clear. Yours seemed like a response to an entirely different post. - 21/12/2012 10:53:39 PM 1179 Views
Explain that remark, it is not obvious to me *NM* - 21/12/2012 11:00:10 PM 530 Views
I think - 21/12/2012 11:13:34 PM 853 Views
Thats' easy, there is simply no such thing as a 'hunting rifle' - 21/12/2012 11:17:41 PM 860 Views
I'd say the expert gunsmith - 21/12/2012 11:28:02 PM 908 Views
I thought I was being perfectly clear. - 21/12/2012 10:57:35 PM 873 Views
Re: I thought I was being perfectly clear. - 21/12/2012 11:25:04 PM 924 Views
Oh I wasn't commenting on the standard of people here - 21/12/2012 11:29:36 PM 844 Views
you're largely correct, which is why we need stronger laws on ownership not guns per se - 21/12/2012 09:39:14 PM 832 Views
I can't think of a better reason than self defense - 21/12/2012 10:33:26 PM 893 Views
He is right about Australia - 21/12/2012 10:46:27 PM 869 Views
No kidding - 21/12/2012 10:59:28 PM 857 Views
If you knew all that - 21/12/2012 11:02:38 PM 881 Views
I think you are on the right track, but to the wrong destination; "lethal weapon" is redundant. - 21/12/2012 11:05:29 PM 865 Views
My read is that the 2nd Amendment not only allows, but mandates, cop-killer bullets. - 22/12/2012 12:45:04 AM 904 Views
Does the Second Amendment protect the rights of felons and the mentally incompetent to have guns? - 22/12/2012 02:35:16 AM 1069 Views
Yes the media is using terms incorrectly but the point still stands. - 22/12/2012 03:02:18 AM 797 Views
Re: Yes the media is using terms incorrectly but the point still stands. - 22/12/2012 04:12:30 AM 855 Views
umm... - 22/12/2012 12:41:31 PM 768 Views
1997 North Hollywood Shootout - 22/12/2012 04:07:39 AM 933 Views
Laws against murder failed to prevent that, too; clearly they are ineffective and should be repealed - 22/12/2012 06:02:24 AM 988 Views
Such laws were never intended for prevention, they define actions that will be punished. *NM* - 23/12/2012 12:57:57 PM 561 Views
So do laws against getting a gun without screening, training and certification. - 23/12/2012 02:01:32 PM 808 Views
Then CHANGE the Constitution, don't ignore it. *NM* - 26/12/2012 03:12:11 PM 495 Views
I am not suggesting either changing or ignoring the Constitution. - 26/12/2012 04:01:02 PM 916 Views
Yes you are. - 26/12/2012 08:06:01 PM 716 Views
Learn logic, and stop needlessly trying to teach me grammar. - 26/12/2012 08:55:25 PM 880 Views
Lear to read, and I won't have to - 27/12/2012 04:28:59 PM 943 Views
You are wrong. - 22/12/2012 12:14:40 PM 891 Views
That explains much; I read somewhere Brits are averse to it. - 22/12/2012 01:17:15 PM 812 Views
We're also averse to being wrong. - 22/12/2012 02:53:49 PM 893 Views
So you say... - 22/12/2012 03:32:16 PM 813 Views
guns r stpid *NM* - 23/12/2012 12:39:30 AM 581 Views
What bemuses me about this thing with Adam Lanza, is that his mother had 5 registered guns - 23/12/2012 07:10:26 AM 908 Views
She was asleep with him in the house. - 23/12/2012 02:24:47 PM 882 Views
LOOK, look, there is another one... - 26/12/2012 03:13:45 PM 822 Views
I find the absolutist ant/pro-gun positions equally dangerous and absurd. - 26/12/2012 04:20:37 PM 798 Views
So we should just *kinda* ignore the Constitution *this* time... But what about NEXT time... - 26/12/2012 08:08:12 PM 784 Views
No, we should enact gun regulation the Constitution explicitly empowers. - 26/12/2012 09:02:12 PM 799 Views
Which would be... NONE. *NM* - 27/12/2012 04:31:53 PM 500 Views
"A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state...." - 28/12/2012 05:14:49 PM 792 Views
*see previous grammar lesson* *NM* - 28/12/2012 10:31:43 PM 484 Views
The instant it becomes relevant, I shall. - 28/12/2012 11:45:01 PM 985 Views
Your point being? - 27/12/2012 10:47:29 AM 782 Views
I am certain it would have been better, though not good, if she had been awake and shot him. - 27/12/2012 02:16:13 PM 902 Views
Facts are irrelevant when FUD is the order of the day. - 24/12/2012 04:34:18 PM 789 Views
It irritates me too. *NM* - 01/01/2013 01:55:05 PM 504 Views

Reply to Message