Hunting rifles may be better at taking down one human at a time, but they aren't as good at taking down a classroom full of 5 year olds and since the sniper-with-a-hunting-rifle problem seems much less relevant than the deranged lunatic walking into a public place and firing as many bullets as possible hunting rifles get more sympathy.
Just a guess, but that might be why.
A person's rifle selection is somewhat purpose based but also has a lot to do with arm-length. I've got the length, for instance, to present an M16A4 at midnight (aim perpendicular to my chest) but most don't and need a carbine for the task. That's only relevant in body armor and those trained without it would feel just as comfortable with a long stock and barrel. For short range a shotgun is always ideal though and that's the standard hunting weapon. If your intent was to leave hunting weapons intact but crack down on those favored by spree killers you'd not succeed, they're effectively identical. People do not hunt with actual sniper rifles much.
Ultimately, with nearly any vaguely modern firearm, time between shots in primarily aiming, so full auto or not is fairly academic.
The reason people (and I'm not one of them, I'd ban them all fwiw) have problems with the AR-15 and semi-automatic pistols like the Glock is because they were designed to fire lots of bullets quickly, something you don't normally associate with good hunting practice. I'm sure you can hunt with an AR-15 or a Bushmaster M4 but that isn't what people are referring to when they talk about 'hunting rifles' that should be allowed, there is a clear difference between the design intent of a semi-automatic weapon like the AR-15 and a gun designed for long range single shot damage. I guess most people don't have a problem with owning a Remington M700 for instance, which is in no way identical to an WASR-10 for the semi-automatic pistols these shooters frequently use.
Come to the dark side, We have candy!
I'm Israel, he's Palestine, its more fun when you pick sides.
I'm Israel, he's Palestine, its more fun when you pick sides.
This message last edited by TheCrownless on 21/12/2012 at 09:53:54 PM
When guns are a big national issue, how do reporters & pundits not know facts about them?
21/12/2012 05:33:14 PM
- 1513 Views
You don't hunt by walking into a classroom and shooting 20 deer
21/12/2012 05:56:16 PM
- 969 Views
You're actually not right on that one
21/12/2012 07:49:53 PM
- 895 Views
That wasn't the point I was making
21/12/2012 09:49:40 PM
- 846 Views
You should probably clarify it then
21/12/2012 10:47:26 PM
- 998 Views
His post was perfectly clear. Yours seemed like a response to an entirely different post.
21/12/2012 10:53:39 PM
- 1155 Views
Explain that remark, it is not obvious to me *NM*
21/12/2012 11:00:10 PM
- 519 Views
I think
21/12/2012 11:13:34 PM
- 828 Views
Thats' easy, there is simply no such thing as a 'hunting rifle'
21/12/2012 11:17:41 PM
- 838 Views
I'd say the expert gunsmith
21/12/2012 11:28:02 PM
- 878 Views
I'm also an expert at math and physics, should I be more forgiving about those too?
22/12/2012 12:38:45 AM
- 828 Views
Re: I'm also an expert at math and physics, should I be more forgiving about those too?
22/12/2012 01:00:18 AM
- 852 Views
Well I appreciate your calling it pedantic when you aren't an expert, thanks for correcting me
22/12/2012 01:15:08 AM
- 910 Views
Re: Well I appreciate your calling it pedantic when you aren't an expert, thanks for correcting me
22/12/2012 09:35:38 AM
- 1037 Views
I thought I was being perfectly clear.
21/12/2012 10:57:35 PM
- 843 Views
A bit of an aside, but I was reading that the gun used in the attack can be bought in Canada too.
21/12/2012 06:14:01 PM
- 852 Views
you're largely correct, which is why we need stronger laws on ownership not guns per se
21/12/2012 09:39:14 PM
- 808 Views
I can't think of a better reason than self defense
21/12/2012 10:33:26 PM
- 866 Views
He is right about Australia
21/12/2012 10:46:27 PM
- 846 Views
No kidding
21/12/2012 10:59:28 PM
- 831 Views
![](/site_media/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
If you knew all that
21/12/2012 11:02:38 PM
- 861 Views
Because I used wiki of course
21/12/2012 11:21:25 PM
- 902 Views
He said ""self defense" is not a valid excuse to own a lethal weapon"
21/12/2012 11:34:59 PM
- 780 Views
Yes,which is un-cited, but I did prove it's a valid excuse to use one, so...
22/12/2012 12:36:19 AM
- 896 Views
The difference between allowing someone to defend themselves with a gun they have
22/12/2012 01:09:40 AM
- 815 Views
Which you apparently think they shouldn't be able to obtain? Catch-22 comes to mind.
22/12/2012 01:17:25 AM
- 863 Views
Re: Which you apparently think they shouldn't be able to obtain? Catch-22 comes to mind.
22/12/2012 09:51:51 AM
- 879 Views
A wood chipper isn't a gun, and evidence without proof isn't evidence
22/12/2012 06:10:34 PM
- 829 Views
If only you'd asked him for a citation rather than just saying you thought he was wrong eh? *NM*
23/12/2012 12:29:30 AM
- 629 Views
I think you are on the right track, but to the wrong destination; "lethal weapon" is redundant.
21/12/2012 11:05:29 PM
- 838 Views
My read is that the 2nd Amendment not only allows, but mandates, cop-killer bullets.
22/12/2012 12:45:04 AM
- 879 Views
Does the Second Amendment protect the rights of felons and the mentally incompetent to have guns?
22/12/2012 02:35:16 AM
- 1042 Views
Court rulings have determined that your Constitutional Rights can be restricted for felony/insanity *NM*
23/12/2012 12:59:31 PM
- 550 Views
Activist judges should not make law.
23/12/2012 02:04:42 PM
- 852 Views
![](/site_media/images/smilies/wink.gif)
I agree, but the courts have already ruled that way so we are stuck. *NM*
26/12/2012 03:03:35 PM
- 516 Views
Then I guess we need the courts to rule gun owners need screening, training and licensing.
26/12/2012 03:46:05 PM
- 847 Views
No, if you want to restrict the 2nd (or any other amendment) amend the Constitution
26/12/2012 07:56:19 PM
- 820 Views
I do not want to restrict the Second Amendment, only enact the regulations it explictly allows.
26/12/2012 08:50:09 PM
- 880 Views
I disagree with your interpretation. The simple EXISTANCE of the BoR makes it binding on the states
27/12/2012 03:46:17 PM
- 845 Views
"Congress shall make no law..." restricts the STATES? How, exactly?
28/12/2012 03:03:19 PM
- 815 Views
The 2nd amendment does not mention Congress in any way. There is that reading issue again.
28/12/2012 10:02:41 PM
- 760 Views
You said, "the Bill of Rights," not "the Second Amendment."
28/12/2012 11:10:00 PM
- 845 Views
Copy-N-Paste, get over it. we are specifically discussing the 2nd amendment, not everything.
29/12/2012 02:24:30 PM
- 736 Views
Some semi-autos are easily modified for full auto fire, making the distinction one w/o a difference.
21/12/2012 10:53:59 PM
- 911 Views
Correction: virtually all semi-automatics are easily convertable
21/12/2012 11:23:35 PM
- 854 Views
I have seen nothing on turning a semi-auto BAR into a fully automatic one.
22/12/2012 01:11:12 AM
- 774 Views
What's a BAR? In any event, link a diagram and I'll let you know
22/12/2012 01:26:31 AM
- 772 Views
Confusingly, there are two: The BAR you and I think of, and the "Browning BAR," a current semi-auto
22/12/2012 01:07:30 PM
- 880 Views
Department of Redundancy Department gets to name a lot of stuff, like "Milky Way Galaxy"
22/12/2012 05:01:45 PM
- 1041 Views
It only bothers me when people who know better speak of "the Glieseian solar system."
26/12/2012 05:33:34 PM
- 928 Views
![](/site_media/images/smilies/banghead.gif)
Both terms are pretty stuck now
26/12/2012 10:48:38 PM
- 993 Views
You realize that encourages rather than discourages my opposition to the usage, right?
27/12/2012 01:23:15 AM
- 770 Views
![](/site_media/images/smilies/wink.gif)
Well I can't say it surprises
27/12/2012 04:29:06 AM
- 709 Views
Yes the media is using terms incorrectly but the point still stands.
22/12/2012 03:02:18 AM
- 768 Views
Re: Yes the media is using terms incorrectly but the point still stands.
22/12/2012 04:12:30 AM
- 828 Views
Yes people can always still kill each other, humans are very ingenuitive
22/12/2012 04:42:04 AM
- 798 Views
I took a driving exam when I was 16, and have never been tested since, nor will I ever be.
23/12/2012 01:17:05 PM
- 947 Views
Never is a long time; just renewing a license requires retaking the eye exam most places.
23/12/2012 02:16:54 PM
- 865 Views
Rather hard to do an eye exam online or through the mail.
26/12/2012 03:08:06 PM
- 948 Views
Yes, it is, which is why I have always had to go by DPS for a new license.
26/12/2012 03:50:04 PM
- 778 Views
Tennessee and Florida pass them out like candy. For several years TN offered a no ID license
26/12/2012 08:02:39 PM
- 786 Views
I still find it odd they require no eye test, that either allows the blind drivers licenses.
26/12/2012 08:58:57 PM
- 825 Views
Oh yeah, we have wandered off course *shrug*
27/12/2012 03:55:55 PM
- 936 Views
Voter registration while getting a drivers license is distinct from the ease of licensing.
28/12/2012 03:35:34 PM
- 908 Views
Re: Voter registration while getting a drivers license is distinct from the ease of licensing.
28/12/2012 10:14:32 PM
- 706 Views
If you can prove someone voted illegally, call the ACLU and claim your $1000.
28/12/2012 11:18:38 PM
- 861 Views
puhleeze.... election fraud is a fact. Pick a state, ANY state, ANY election...
29/12/2012 02:41:40 PM
- 815 Views
Clip size is meaningless, semi-autos and even revolvers can be reloaded VERY quickly. *NM*
23/12/2012 01:20:59 PM
- 514 Views
1997 North Hollywood Shootout
22/12/2012 04:07:39 AM
- 911 Views
typical NRA bullshit response
22/12/2012 04:53:40 AM
- 847 Views
typical Moondog bullshit response
23/12/2012 01:06:12 PM
- 851 Views
of course! there is no connection between having a gun and shooting someone. got it
23/12/2012 02:33:18 PM
- 741 Views
![](/site_media/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
There is no corelation between decidng to kill someone and what tool you use.
26/12/2012 03:11:08 PM
- 801 Views
By that logic no one needs a gun for self-defense; a coffee mug is perfectly adequate.
26/12/2012 09:06:51 PM
- 850 Views
I can kill you with my coffee mug... RESPECT THE MUG but I wouldn't, I might spill the coffee.
27/12/2012 04:08:52 PM
- 713 Views
So you are saying you do not need a gun then? I will keep mine anyway, thanks.
28/12/2012 04:19:03 PM
- 800 Views
![](/site_media/images/smilies/wink.gif)
You covered a bunch of different things, and completely misrepresentted what I wrote
28/12/2012 10:28:24 PM
- 841 Views
Home made explosives are pretty much always illegal; I did not want to overlook legal ones.
28/12/2012 11:44:19 PM
- 1036 Views
Re: Home made explosives are pretty much always illegal; I did not want to overlook legal ones.
29/12/2012 03:31:01 PM
- 787 Views
Laws against murder failed to prevent that, too; clearly they are ineffective and should be repealed
22/12/2012 06:02:24 AM
- 962 Views
Such laws were never intended for prevention, they define actions that will be punished. *NM*
23/12/2012 12:57:57 PM
- 550 Views
So do laws against getting a gun without screening, training and certification.
23/12/2012 02:01:32 PM
- 782 Views
Then CHANGE the Constitution, don't ignore it. *NM*
26/12/2012 03:12:11 PM
- 487 Views
I am not suggesting either changing or ignoring the Constitution.
26/12/2012 04:01:02 PM
- 891 Views
Yes you are.
26/12/2012 08:06:01 PM
- 690 Views
Learn logic, and stop needlessly trying to teach me grammar.
26/12/2012 08:55:25 PM
- 856 Views
Lear to read, and I won't have to
27/12/2012 04:28:59 PM
- 916 Views
Ironically, you misspelled "learn."
28/12/2012 05:15:17 PM
- 1150 Views
![](/site_media/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
I know, I thought about going back and fixing the typo, but thought it was funny so I left it.
*NM*
28/12/2012 10:34:06 PM
- 512 Views
![](/site_media/images/smilies/smile.gif)
2 commas or 4 makes no difference one is a 12D the other is a sentance.
28/12/2012 10:55:31 PM
- 784 Views
It makes a huge difference when (incorrectly) claiming to know the text.
28/12/2012 11:31:51 PM
- 1098 Views
and by REGULATED, the authors meeant "able to use it effectively"
29/12/2012 03:47:57 PM
- 852 Views
You are wrong.
22/12/2012 12:14:40 PM
- 866 Views
That explains much; I read somewhere Brits are averse to it.
22/12/2012 01:17:15 PM
- 786 Views
What bemuses me about this thing with Adam Lanza, is that his mother had 5 registered guns
23/12/2012 07:10:26 AM
- 885 Views
She also had many knives, and blunt objecs around the house. Tools are only as good as the user
23/12/2012 01:10:58 PM
- 878 Views
So clearly she wasn't prepared enough... btw, do we know she was sleeping?
27/12/2012 10:52:03 AM
- 815 Views
That she 1) was in bed, 2) had guns for self-defense and 3) was shot 4 times strongly suggests sleep
28/12/2012 11:49:20 PM
- 886 Views
She was asleep with him in the house.
23/12/2012 02:24:47 PM
- 857 Views
LOOK, look, there is another one...
26/12/2012 03:13:45 PM
- 799 Views
I find the absolutist ant/pro-gun positions equally dangerous and absurd.
26/12/2012 04:20:37 PM
- 774 Views
So we should just *kinda* ignore the Constitution *this* time... But what about NEXT time...
26/12/2012 08:08:12 PM
- 756 Views
No, we should enact gun regulation the Constitution explicitly empowers.
26/12/2012 09:02:12 PM
- 772 Views
Which would be... NONE. *NM*
27/12/2012 04:31:53 PM
- 491 Views
"A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state...."
28/12/2012 05:14:49 PM
- 770 Views
Your point being?
27/12/2012 10:47:29 AM
- 756 Views
I am certain it would have been better, though not good, if she had been awake and shot him.
27/12/2012 02:16:13 PM
- 877 Views
So the situation of Nancy and Adam shooting at each other
28/12/2012 07:44:12 AM
- 886 Views
No, I believe they were both mentally incompetent to have guns; that does not mean EVERYONE is.
28/12/2012 02:19:51 PM
- 803 Views
As a father, I would rather kill my own child than have him kill 26 other people.
27/12/2012 04:35:02 PM
- 716 Views
And as a father, you are somehow clairvoyant?
28/12/2012 07:43:08 AM
- 770 Views
Nice flippant unthinking reply, you and moondog should get together. *NM*
28/12/2012 04:55:14 PM
- 533 Views
How is my reply flippant? Your statement was unthinking, not mine.
29/12/2012 06:59:04 AM
- 809 Views
YOU asked if it would have been better for her to kill her own child instead, I answered.
29/12/2012 03:52:02 PM
- 817 Views
I asked if a shoot out between mother and son had been better, not whether she should have killed
29/12/2012 08:54:09 PM
- 755 Views
You make no sense.
31/12/2012 06:07:50 PM
- 826 Views
I make no sense to you because you probably just don't understand my point.
01/01/2013 08:09:11 AM
- 902 Views
Maybe the heat death of the univers occurs before you finally have a cohearant thought
01/01/2013 07:34:31 PM
- 819 Views
You do realize that resorting to personal attacks reveal an inability to make sound arguments? *NM*
02/01/2013 06:01:33 PM
- 583 Views
That is not an ad hominem attack, and your prior post was not very logically coherent
02/01/2013 08:59:16 PM
- 898 Views
Instead of actually showing why my arguments would be incoherent or why I'm immature, he just said
05/01/2013 02:02:23 AM
- 896 Views