Yup, yup; the Constitution is all about majority rule WITH minority rights.
Joel Send a noteboard - 16/12/2012 01:56:15 PM
Instead, you wrote some typical conservative nonsense. Old dog, new tricks, whatever.
The whole reason we have a constitution, (and not just a lot of law) is to protect the people from themselves, so that the winds of popularity don't become tyranny. If you want to respect the "intent of the founders" you should also respect that the founders would never in a million years have allowed the common people to vote on anything as important as "who gets which rights."
That's why we have a constitution. That's why we have justices. If Scalia's interpretation of the founder's original intent was correct, than his job would not exist.
The whole reason we have a constitution, (and not just a lot of law) is to protect the people from themselves, so that the winds of popularity don't become tyranny. If you want to respect the "intent of the founders" you should also respect that the founders would never in a million years have allowed the common people to vote on anything as important as "who gets which rights."
That's why we have a constitution. That's why we have justices. If Scalia's interpretation of the founder's original intent was correct, than his job would not exist.
Hence it established the Electoral College rather than awarding the presidency to the winner of a national popular vote. America was founded on the premise that "all men are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights," not "rights" arbitrarily granted or rescinded as dictated by individual or even popular preference. Those would be PRIVILEGES; our RIGHTS are sacrosanct (i.e. inalienable.)
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
SCOTUS Justice Antonin Scalia is brilliant, just brilliant - 
- 11/12/2012 05:09:19 AM
1095 Views
- 11/12/2012 05:09:19 AM
1095 Views
WTF does "I don’t care what their intent was. I care what it was that they intended" mean? 
- 11/12/2012 09:03:23 PM
635 Views
- 11/12/2012 09:03:23 PM
635 Views
Yeah I read that twice to see if that was right *NM*
- 11/12/2012 09:36:55 PM
291 Views
Part of me pities Scalias decline, because he could once nimbly and convincly argue black is white.
- 12/12/2012 07:09:56 PM
609 Views
Re: your post.
- 12/12/2012 07:18:18 PM
567 Views
More like disapeared in a puff of Florida's own law that they were trying to ignore.
- 12/12/2012 08:13:13 PM
589 Views
Florida state law does not and did not prohibit statewide recounts.
- 16/12/2012 01:45:52 PM
587 Views
Spoken like a true lib.....I could have written that for you.
- 12/12/2012 05:08:42 AM
623 Views
The people of WA and CO just decided pot should be legal; think Scalia agrees?
- 12/12/2012 07:25:11 PM
610 Views
FreshMints decided that the almond aroma of radioactive arsenic is very pleasing...
- 12/12/2012 08:09:39 PM
632 Views
I am aware of Scalias "logic," and his rejection of it about a year later with Robamacare.
- 16/12/2012 01:51:16 PM
598 Views
But you didn't.
- 13/12/2012 04:06:05 PM
612 Views
Yup, yup; the Constitution is all about majority rule WITH minority rights.
- 16/12/2012 01:56:15 PM
534 Views
Your whole rant lacks any logic
- 12/12/2012 03:46:34 PM
630 Views
His comment references the authors (NOT words) intent in both negative and affirmative.
- 12/12/2012 06:45:02 PM
587 Views
I was stumped by his phrasing as well
- 12/12/2012 09:31:53 PM
498 Views
But we must go by his words and his understanding of their meaning, without interpretation. 
- 16/12/2012 01:40:23 PM
585 Views
- 16/12/2012 01:40:23 PM
585 Views
The SCotUS is no place for raging homophobes.
- 13/12/2012 04:48:30 AM
731 Views
Sorry you don't like it, but what he said is true.
- 13/12/2012 03:11:42 PM
642 Views
Lol. Homophobia is synonymous w/ homonegativism. It's not meant to convey a true phobia *NM*
- 13/12/2012 03:28:01 PM
361 Views
Only for people who don't know actually know how to read and understand words. Nice spin though. *NM*
- 13/12/2012 05:54:29 PM
242 Views
So then what we need is a definition of homophobia?
- 13/12/2012 09:56:15 PM
668 Views
Re: So then what we need is a definition of homophobia?
- 13/12/2012 11:16:46 PM
608 Views
-phobe : Greek -phobos, adj. derivative of phóbos fear, panic
- 13/12/2012 11:32:14 PM
635 Views
Do you have a similar problem with "xenophobia?" Because it's exactly the same thing.
- 14/12/2012 01:30:24 AM
562 Views
xenophobia is the fear of the alien... WTF are you trying to say?
- 14/12/2012 03:03:09 AM
628 Views
No. You are patently, objectively incorrect.
- 14/12/2012 08:39:00 AM
549 Views
Don't believe me, ask a Greek it is after all THEIR word. I gave you some extra capitals, happy now? *NM*
- 14/12/2012 02:56:09 PM
361 Views
stop being obtuse
- 14/12/2012 05:10:41 PM
602 Views
Hmmmm lets see, people misuse a word, perverting its meaning...
- 14/12/2012 07:29:11 PM
567 Views
If everyone "misuses" a word, that becomes an acceptable use of it.
- 14/12/2012 10:14:23 PM
567 Views
Re: If everyone "misuses" a word, that becomes an acceptable use of it.
- 15/12/2012 12:12:18 AM
609 Views
*NM*
and if everryone jumps off a cliff to splatter on the rocks I should just be a good little lemming.
- 15/12/2012 07:13:27 AM
501 Views
actually, you have already chosen stupid by pretending the word means something it does not
- 15/12/2012 03:34:35 PM
525 Views
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA, my friend John would strenuously disagree.
- 16/12/2012 06:50:19 AM
638 Views
and you are a small-minded buffoon who can't come up with real arguments so you resort to nitpicking
- 17/12/2012 11:48:25 PM
571 Views