Active Users:1133 Time:23/11/2024 01:27:57 AM
Florida state law does not and did not prohibit statewide recounts. Joel Send a noteboard - 16/12/2012 01:45:52 PM
SCOTUS ruled that Florida had to follow their own laws, that existed at the time of the election, not change them on the fly.

It only required that the results be certified by a specific date, and the SCOTUS stepped in to declare no recount could be completed by that date. Scalias vote with the majority asserting he and his fellows are clairvoyant and precognitive does not exactly support his supposed belief in limited SCOTUS power.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
SCOTUS Justice Antonin Scalia is brilliant, just brilliant - - 11/12/2012 05:09:19 AM 987 Views
WTF does "I don’t care what their intent was. I care what it was that they intended" mean? - 11/12/2012 09:03:23 PM 554 Views
Yeah I read that twice to see if that was right *NM* - 11/12/2012 09:36:55 PM 269 Views
Part of me pities Scalias decline, because he could once nimbly and convincly argue black is white. - 12/12/2012 07:09:56 PM 526 Views
Re: your post. - 12/12/2012 07:18:18 PM 501 Views
You are quite right; I never noticed that until now. - 12/12/2012 07:29:08 PM 601 Views
Not quite - 12/12/2012 08:16:27 PM 619 Views
Poes Law. - 16/12/2012 01:42:55 PM 523 Views
More like disapeared in a puff of Florida's own law that they were trying to ignore. - 12/12/2012 08:13:13 PM 519 Views
actually..... - 12/12/2012 08:32:58 PM 604 Views
Re: actually..... - 12/12/2012 09:39:01 PM 510 Views
Florida state law does not and did not prohibit statewide recounts. - 16/12/2012 01:45:52 PM 520 Views
Your whole rant lacks any logic - 12/12/2012 03:46:34 PM 560 Views
+1 - logic is not his strong suit. *NM* - 12/12/2012 04:21:09 PM 222 Views
His comment references the authors (NOT words) intent in both negative and affirmative. - 12/12/2012 06:45:02 PM 519 Views
Rebuttal - 12/12/2012 07:58:41 PM 558 Views
Only nominally. - 16/12/2012 03:54:38 PM 517 Views
I was stumped by his phrasing as well - 12/12/2012 09:31:53 PM 425 Views
The SCotUS is no place for raging homophobes. - 13/12/2012 04:48:30 AM 655 Views
Sorry you don't like it, but what he said is true. - 13/12/2012 03:11:42 PM 575 Views
Lol. Homophobia is synonymous w/ homonegativism. It's not meant to convey a true phobia *NM* - 13/12/2012 03:28:01 PM 333 Views
So then what we need is a definition of homophobia? - 13/12/2012 09:56:15 PM 600 Views
Re: So then what we need is a definition of homophobia? - 13/12/2012 11:16:46 PM 548 Views
-phobe : Greek -phobos, adj. derivative of phóbos fear, panic - 13/12/2012 11:32:14 PM 562 Views
Do you have a similar problem with "xenophobia?" Because it's exactly the same thing. - 14/12/2012 01:30:24 AM 487 Views
xenophobia is the fear of the alien... WTF are you trying to say? - 14/12/2012 03:03:09 AM 552 Views
No. You are patently, objectively incorrect. - 14/12/2012 08:39:00 AM 479 Views
An aside. - 14/12/2012 01:21:32 PM 559 Views
Don't believe me, ask a Greek it is after all THEIR word. I gave you some extra capitals, happy now? *NM* - 14/12/2012 02:56:09 PM 336 Views
stop being obtuse - 14/12/2012 05:10:41 PM 532 Views
Hmmmm lets see, people misuse a word, perverting its meaning... - 14/12/2012 07:29:11 PM 497 Views
Double post. *NM* - 14/12/2012 10:14:50 PM 238 Views
that's glory for you! - 14/12/2012 10:44:30 PM 565 Views
So very conflicted, in so many ways.... - 16/12/2012 04:14:08 PM 659 Views

Reply to Message