Active Users:1105 Time:22/11/2024 10:03:47 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Oh. I must've missed that. Legolas Send a noteboard - 07/11/2012 10:03:28 PM
She's off - I think it was announced a while ago but got buried under the election stuff. Three years to carefully get ready for her bid for the White House (I'd imagine being Secretary of State would be a hindrance when trying to find the time to campaign in the primaries then election?)

But as you note, it might not be a bad thing... yeah, would be essentially impossible to campaign while being Secretary of State. Which is making me wonder what it says about the office of President that that one CAN be combined with campaigning... :P
Reply to message
My own thoughts on the election results Tom - 07/11/2012 06:12:26 PM 1161 Views
I feel bad nossy - 07/11/2012 06:51:03 PM 747 Views
Well said. The Shrike - 07/11/2012 06:56:36 PM 853 Views
Romney might have been a good president TheCrownless - 07/11/2012 07:10:14 PM 770 Views
it's hard to say romney would have been better when he took every side of every issue moondog - 07/11/2012 07:10:25 PM 798 Views
Do you think Republicans got the message, or will it take one more unnecessary defeat? *NM* Burr - 07/11/2012 07:11:50 PM 332 Views
Good points all. Somehow I don't really think they'll take them to heart any time soon, though... Legolas - 07/11/2012 08:00:56 PM 813 Views
Re: Hillary. Nate - 07/11/2012 08:13:25 PM 721 Views
A lot of people seem to think she will. Legolas - 07/11/2012 08:26:57 PM 794 Views
Biden hinted he was thinking about running. But he looks older, so that might benefit her. Burr - 07/11/2012 09:18:49 PM 743 Views
I maintain that Mark Warner will get the nod next time around Jragghen - 07/11/2012 09:57:21 PM 698 Views
Um snoopcester - 07/11/2012 09:50:08 PM 727 Views
Oh. I must've missed that. Legolas - 07/11/2012 10:03:28 PM 711 Views
Well there has been a slightly more important US politics story for the media to cover of late snoopcester - 07/11/2012 10:18:28 PM 734 Views
Snowe? Seriously? Chris Christie is far more likely. Tom - 07/11/2012 09:52:25 PM 716 Views
Chris Christie *was* far more likely. I expect his party to eat him alive after Sandy. Jragghen - 07/11/2012 09:59:17 PM 882 Views
Yes, but Christie gained the respect of a lot of moderates for that. Ghavrel - 07/11/2012 10:20:08 PM 721 Views
Moderates don't vote in the primaries *NM* Jragghen - 07/11/2012 10:21:50 PM 403 Views
Enough of them vote to ensure a Christie victory in a GOP primary. Ghavrel - 08/11/2012 05:09:24 AM 700 Views
It should help him snoopcester - 07/11/2012 10:22:34 PM 668 Views
I doubt it. Tom - 08/11/2012 03:20:54 PM 702 Views
did you see jon stewart's take on the rove meltdown? moondog - 08/11/2012 05:51:53 PM 718 Views
Re: I doubt it. TaskmasterJack - 09/11/2012 03:22:23 AM 761 Views
Has been seen as not entirely Republican for quite a while, I think. Legolas - 07/11/2012 10:08:15 PM 709 Views
Re: Hillary. unstuckman - 08/11/2012 02:46:57 AM 1154 Views
Dems went through this a generation ago when Reagan branded extremists and made "liberal" a slur Joel - 11/11/2012 06:10:00 PM 915 Views
Very interesting post, Tom. Macharius - 08/11/2012 06:13:24 PM 820 Views
It will be interesting whether the GOPs financiers convince its primary voters you are right. Joel - 11/11/2012 05:07:43 PM 842 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes