the views of some members of the republican party just confuse the hell out of me
wolfsister Send a noteboard - 28/10/2012 02:19:11 AM
Let me get this straight: no contraceptives (and general lack of sex education), no abortion, no same-gender marriage, a general rape-apologist attitude, and the Bible backs it all up?
Wouldn't it seem logical that maybe teaching people about safe sex ALONG with abstinence would prevent some of these abortions you hate so much? Not just in the "unwanted" pregnancy situations, but in the rape situations as well. Taking the time to bring awareness about the rape culture we live in (and not staying silent on the issue or even ENCOURAGING it, thereby making more and more rapists think it's okay!) may just have the same effect on the number of abortions in this country.
And contraceptives? Surprise! Contraceptives tend to stop unwanted pregnancies! Imagine that!
And then, when a woman in a life-threatening situation does need an abortion, you deny her one. Even though "traditional" marriage of one man and one woman is *SO* important, and clearly every child that didn't grow up with both is doomed? You're willing to kill off the woman who may already be a mother and destroy that family (and possibly any potential life that may come from that family later)? REALLY?
And, in case you haven't noticed, unlike those ancient people you look to in the Bible for how to live your life, preservation of your race is not in danger. Not only that, but you should be aware that the people the Bible is speaking about required abortions in certain circumstances and valued the mother's life over the fetus' (even in their hard-core patriarchal society where woman were essentially baby-makers). So if you're looking for your justification there in specifics, you're going to be hard pressed to truly find it. As well as your views on "traditional" marriage and its "values." The Bible is filled with first wives, second wives, concubines, slave wives and hardly any nuclear families. We have so many people, so many KIDS that need homes right now... and you won't let LGBTQ people marry because of some taken-out-of-context, often mistranslated verses of the Bible? And even though marriage (to most Biblical peoples) was strictly economic and "secular" and really had nothing to do with religion at all? Many of those LGBTQ couples would be happy to take on your "unwanted" children, and some may have their own too! And on top of that, gays and lesbians have proven to be excellent parents! But no. Wouldn't want them to one-up us in the ability to raise rape-apologist, discriminatory, close-minded children.
Okay, that was a bit of a rant, but it all connects to me and just becomes one giant clusterfuck of an opinion on social issues.
Wouldn't it seem logical that maybe teaching people about safe sex ALONG with abstinence would prevent some of these abortions you hate so much? Not just in the "unwanted" pregnancy situations, but in the rape situations as well. Taking the time to bring awareness about the rape culture we live in (and not staying silent on the issue or even ENCOURAGING it, thereby making more and more rapists think it's okay!) may just have the same effect on the number of abortions in this country.
And contraceptives? Surprise! Contraceptives tend to stop unwanted pregnancies! Imagine that!
And then, when a woman in a life-threatening situation does need an abortion, you deny her one. Even though "traditional" marriage of one man and one woman is *SO* important, and clearly every child that didn't grow up with both is doomed? You're willing to kill off the woman who may already be a mother and destroy that family (and possibly any potential life that may come from that family later)? REALLY?
And, in case you haven't noticed, unlike those ancient people you look to in the Bible for how to live your life, preservation of your race is not in danger. Not only that, but you should be aware that the people the Bible is speaking about required abortions in certain circumstances and valued the mother's life over the fetus' (even in their hard-core patriarchal society where woman were essentially baby-makers). So if you're looking for your justification there in specifics, you're going to be hard pressed to truly find it. As well as your views on "traditional" marriage and its "values." The Bible is filled with first wives, second wives, concubines, slave wives and hardly any nuclear families. We have so many people, so many KIDS that need homes right now... and you won't let LGBTQ people marry because of some taken-out-of-context, often mistranslated verses of the Bible? And even though marriage (to most Biblical peoples) was strictly economic and "secular" and really had nothing to do with religion at all? Many of those LGBTQ couples would be happy to take on your "unwanted" children, and some may have their own too! And on top of that, gays and lesbians have proven to be excellent parents! But no. Wouldn't want them to one-up us in the ability to raise rape-apologist, discriminatory, close-minded children.
Okay, that was a bit of a rant, but it all connects to me and just becomes one giant clusterfuck of an opinion on social issues.
to the max!
This message last edited by wolfsister on 28/10/2012 at 02:21:54 AM
Congressman Joe Walsh (R-IL) Says Abortion Never Necessary to Save a Womans Life
27/10/2012 04:00:36 PM
- 876 Views
my friend's sister had an abortion that saved her life. ectopic pregnancy. people need to read. *NM*
27/10/2012 07:26:20 PM
- 281 Views
Yeah, he ultimately decided abortion was OK for ectopic pregnancy.
27/10/2012 09:18:00 PM
- 379 Views
Why is a 12 year old getting pregnant? Traffic doesn't care if jaywalkers are 12 or 30.
28/10/2012 03:04:50 AM
- 499 Views
Because she was raped; sex w/ 12 year olds, "consensual" or not, is pretty much illegal everywhere.
28/10/2012 01:56:37 PM
- 453 Views
sure. no instances except:
27/10/2012 11:45:54 PM
- 490 Views
Like when Romney insisted a mother of four not have an abortion to save her life?
28/10/2012 12:35:26 AM
- 644 Views
the views of some members of the republican party just confuse the hell out of me
28/10/2012 02:19:11 AM
- 401 Views
I hear ya, but factually lacking policies are only plausible on a factually flawed basis.
28/10/2012 02:16:40 PM
- 617 Views
first, I should clarify that these are the opinions of some, not all "Republicans,"
28/10/2012 04:02:13 PM
- 404 Views
It is demonstrably the opinion of Republican federal lawmakers, which is what counts.
28/10/2012 05:27:20 PM
- 453 Views
How about, if you have those conditions, don't get pregnant!
28/10/2012 03:17:23 AM
- 426 Views
it's not always possible to know ahead of time
28/10/2012 06:16:36 AM
- 449 Views
None of those myths would justify abortion, even if they were real.
01/11/2012 04:11:34 AM
- 376 Views
Contraceptives aren't perfect, you know
28/10/2012 02:18:37 PM
- 357 Views
Keep her legs together then. Really, the problems of a would-be child-killer are of nil concern *NM*
01/11/2012 04:07:06 AM
- 187 Views
How many abortions have you caused women to have, that you are so blind to the crap here?
28/10/2012 02:50:06 AM
- 412 Views
how many kids have you adopted, in order to preserve the life you claim to save?
29/10/2012 05:26:38 PM
- 411 Views
I guess... I'm confused about something. WHY do they all keep talking about this?
28/10/2012 04:36:45 PM
- 366 Views
It is like the monkeys and typewriters thing but with politicians and microphones
28/10/2012 04:47:26 PM
- 359 Views
The only plausible explanation is "because they believe it."
28/10/2012 05:42:18 PM
- 406 Views
Eh, I don't know. I feel like someone is telling them there is political capital to be made.
28/10/2012 06:35:34 PM
- 483 Views
Appealing to the base in the general election is usually a zero sum game.
28/10/2012 07:08:32 PM
- 496 Views