How far do those subs range, compared to US subs ? They might be out for tours of no more than six weeks or so, while US subs probably go out for far longer sometimes.
It's probably beyond our ability to google though.
It's probably beyond our ability to google though.
Wikipedia says that the only class of Australian submarines have an endurance of 70 days, which is probably as much info as we'll get. Unless you go nuclear it's hard to get longer than that anyway, due to the need for refueling.
--- signature starts here ---
I am the Demon of Delightfulness and Sinister Smirkings!
e^(πi)+1=0
identity named after the Terry Pratchett of 18th century mathematics
I am the Demon of Delightfulness and Sinister Smirkings!
e^(πi)+1=0
identity named after the Terry Pratchett of 18th century mathematics
"Military may lift ban on women in submarines" (Reuters)
- 28/09/2009 08:26:30 PM
798 Views
gives new meaning to the old joke....
- 28/09/2009 09:47:36 PM
501 Views
*NM*
my favorite joke from Navy basic training (mature readers only, poorly veiled sexual reference)
- 28/09/2009 10:06:51 PM
586 Views
As I understand it, there are very good reasons why they don't let women on submarines.
- 28/09/2009 09:50:39 PM
571 Views
frankly i get along better with women who are menstruating with me.
- 28/09/2009 11:26:05 PM
524 Views
seems like a strange choice to me
- 28/09/2009 10:26:24 PM
550 Views
if you can't keep it zipped
- 28/09/2009 11:35:35 PM
538 Views
Correct and yet it happens all too frequently already.
- 29/09/2009 12:43:15 AM
510 Views
In my mind, that's a pretty pathetic arguement.
- 29/09/2009 01:02:31 AM
577 Views
WHOA!
- 29/09/2009 01:14:27 AM
488 Views
Dude I know!!
- 29/09/2009 01:20:27 AM
476 Views
Hehehe, we could "name the show".
- 29/09/2009 01:26:11 AM
481 Views
XD Or even better!!!
- 29/09/2009 01:40:50 AM
521 Views
ROFL!
- 29/09/2009 01:47:07 AM
461 Views
Your comparison to segregation is idiotic. I won't even give such a stupid claim a second thought. *NM*
- 29/09/2009 01:44:46 AM
224 Views
I love how you disregard my entire arguement based on that one factor
- 29/09/2009 01:48:09 AM
528 Views
It is an irresponsible comparison. Even in your response to my comment you can't make it work. *NM*
- 29/09/2009 06:39:48 PM
218 Views
Actually I could see her point. She was thinking along a different line than you thought she was. *NM*
- 29/09/2009 02:57:17 AM
255 Views
It's not idiotic at all.
- 29/09/2009 05:21:49 AM
512 Views
Sweden has women on subs, as do (at least) Norway, Germany, Australia and Canada *NM*
- 29/09/2009 07:38:43 AM
247 Views
Just wondering..
- 29/09/2009 12:42:22 PM
518 Views
well since all of those countries use diesel/electric subs I would no they don't stay out as long
- 29/09/2009 03:10:34 PM
496 Views
There's also the fact that none of those countries have nuclear weapons
- 29/09/2009 03:14:48 PM
517 Views
As for Sweden, that sounds about right
- 29/09/2009 03:12:29 PM
469 Views
Racial prejudice has nothing to do with envy over who is fucking who. It is not a valid comparison. *NM*
- 29/09/2009 06:40:57 PM
242 Views
~Plays devils advocate~ Lets pretend...
- 29/09/2009 02:54:03 AM
601 Views
By that same token, should women also be banned from long business trips? *NM*
- 29/09/2009 03:23:22 AM
239 Views
Re: ~Plays devils advocate~ Lets pretend...
- 29/09/2009 03:23:31 AM
497 Views
It might be true in some situations, but it's a weak argument against this issue.
- 29/09/2009 05:15:47 AM
522 Views
subs are really really cramped. Ever heard the phrase hot racking?
- 29/09/2009 03:23:33 PM
604 Views
"The military is instrument of war not social engineering." Excelent point. *NM*
- 30/09/2009 12:34:28 AM
317 Views
oh please will people stop the “it worked with segregation argument”
- 29/09/2009 03:01:48 PM
493 Views
A submariner's perspective
- 29/09/2009 08:30:45 AM
545 Views
That was not Beqi but Grimbear. I was signed in but it still credited the post to her. GRRR! *NM*
- 29/09/2009 08:32:21 AM
333 Views
Interesting.
- 29/09/2009 09:55:11 AM
555 Views
a rack is just the name for a bed
- 29/09/2009 03:30:05 PM
499 Views
See, that's a good reason.
- 29/09/2009 01:29:32 PM
514 Views
before you knock the return to high school argument
- 29/09/2009 10:39:47 PM
462 Views
which i think is just silly in the terms of greater age-related legalities 
- 30/09/2009 12:08:46 AM
524 Views
- 30/09/2009 12:08:46 AM
524 Views
Re: which i think is just silly in the terms of greater age-related legalities
- 30/09/2009 01:12:05 AM
483 Views
- 30/09/2009 01:12:05 AM
483 Views