Active Users:366 Time:19/04/2025 03:50:21 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Closer than Roland, but still off. Legolas Send a noteboard - 25/10/2012 09:51:12 PM
Else she would not have remained a virgin and Isaiahs virgin birth prophecy would remain unfulfilled. There is nothing noteworthy in sex causing pregnancy. Incidentally, the Roman Catholic doctrine of Immaculate Conception refers not to its manner, but the belief it made Mary sinless—retroactively—through Christs perfection.

There's nothing retroactive about the Immaculate Conception: the Roman Catholic Church holds that Mary was conceived and born free from original sin from day one. Which if you ask me makes no sense and kind of undermines the concept of Jesus being a "son of man", if he is born in parthenogenesis of a woman who's unique and preferred over all other humans in her own right, but my opinion is besides the point here. :P
Reply to message
every time a republican candidate mentions rape, i think of the following video moondog - 25/10/2012 05:58:16 PM 824 Views
WTF was that?!?!?!?!? *NM* imlad - 25/10/2012 06:22:46 PM 302 Views
that's hilarious and evokes a "what the shit?" much like all those gop jackasses. temeraire - 25/10/2012 08:03:24 PM 498 Views
The sole difference between Western and Mideast fundamentalists is the god blamed for intolerance Joel - 26/10/2012 01:29:54 AM 481 Views
I am SO GOING to get flamed for asking this Roland00 - 25/10/2012 08:45:21 PM 507 Views
No, because God did not have sex with Mary. Joel - 25/10/2012 09:23:12 PM 619 Views
Following that logic Roland00 - 25/10/2012 09:25:11 PM 503 Views
Think of it in terms of The Merchant of Venice. Joel - 25/10/2012 10:28:42 PM 478 Views
Closer than Roland, but still off. Legolas - 25/10/2012 09:51:12 PM 503 Views
However parsed, since Marys supposed sinlessness is through Christs conception, it is retroactive Joel - 25/10/2012 10:10:48 PM 485 Views
The point I am horrible job making is this Roland00 - 25/10/2012 10:12:53 PM 509 Views
The biblical narrative states an act of CONCEPTION without an act of SEX. Joel - 25/10/2012 10:37:48 PM 473 Views
Seems it depends on the legislation you're in. Legolas - 25/10/2012 10:50:09 PM 484 Views
One other thing Roland00 - 25/10/2012 10:14:27 PM 488 Views
Fine by me; I am catholic, not Roman Catholic. Joel - 25/10/2012 10:30:46 PM 490 Views
It's a bit more ambiguous than that. Legolas - 25/10/2012 10:39:15 PM 496 Views
It certainly does not say that Tom - 26/10/2012 01:15:45 AM 480 Views
Evidently the Onion heard you Joel - 26/10/2012 01:18:10 PM 737 Views
New GOP Congressmen daily refute the GOPs pretended support of rape exceptions to abortion bans. Joel - 25/10/2012 10:07:21 PM 728 Views
This is not a source I generally resort to, but let me quote John Cornyn: Legolas - 25/10/2012 11:11:04 PM 485 Views
I think he is an idiot for saying it snoopcester - 25/10/2012 11:53:01 PM 498 Views
How cynical. Legolas - 26/10/2012 12:02:14 AM 577 Views
Realist, thankyouverymuch snoopcester - 26/10/2012 12:14:38 AM 443 Views
Calling y Gods will calls x Gods will, because y depends on x. Joel - 26/10/2012 12:14:27 AM 599 Views
I'm really not going to debate theodicy with you, especially since I'm not even a believer. Legolas - 26/10/2012 12:24:57 AM 488 Views
Choice forms a critical distinction there; small wonder Cornyn and Mourdock missed it. Joel - 26/10/2012 12:48:18 AM 554 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes