Active Users:1179 Time:23/11/2024 04:25:04 AM
But we know very well that it doesn't have dire commercial consequences. Burr Send a noteboard - 25/10/2012 07:17:55 PM
I defy you to find one example in the 1950s conservative South of someone going out of business because they refused to hire African-American as something other than a janitor.

For the modern age, I point at Chick Filet, which is doing just fine despite its clearly bigoted perspective and policies.

It simply isn't true that discrimination will work itself out on its own. Hell, that's the same argument we made about slavery. How long are we going to make that argument?
||||||||||*MySmiley*
Only so evil.
Reply to message
For all you supporters of Gay Marriage: What about polygamy? - 20/10/2012 12:02:06 AM 1369 Views
Legal rights. - 20/10/2012 12:14:10 AM 776 Views
It almost sounds like you are saying... - 20/10/2012 12:31:40 AM 746 Views
That is what I'm saying it. - 20/10/2012 01:07:50 AM 728 Views
Technically, privileges, not rights. - 20/10/2012 04:16:45 AM 732 Views
Sure - 20/10/2012 12:35:53 AM 658 Views
All for it... For adults over the age of 18. *NM* - 20/10/2012 01:18:04 AM 390 Views
What about it? - 20/10/2012 01:21:17 AM 736 Views
+1 *NM* - 20/10/2012 01:51:25 AM 424 Views
+2 *NM* - 20/10/2012 11:18:39 AM 376 Views
should be legal, would be nice for poly people. should include polygyny and polyandry. *NM* - 20/10/2012 03:29:05 AM 376 Views
poly people? - 20/10/2012 12:44:01 PM 703 Views
Government needs to stop legislating morality. So yes *NM* - 20/10/2012 03:36:37 AM 368 Views
That's a huge chunk of what government does. - 20/10/2012 04:35:45 PM 705 Views
That's not what I'm saying - 21/10/2012 03:21:08 AM 721 Views
So you're opposed to abortion and gun control then? Welcome aboard! - 21/10/2012 06:14:14 AM 670 Views
Why do you keep talking about gay marriage and polygamy in the same sentence.. - 20/10/2012 03:58:26 AM 749 Views
Get a grip. Your response is just what I tried to avoid. - 20/10/2012 04:33:40 AM 666 Views
The more fool you. - 21/10/2012 05:55:30 AM 760 Views
Ha! Point. *NM* - 20/10/2012 05:40:34 AM 566 Views
Marriage is always a choice, whatever the motive(s.) - 22/10/2012 04:00:40 PM 692 Views
I got no opinion on it. - 20/10/2012 12:51:43 PM 788 Views
The idea of a group marriage makes me uncomfortable - 20/10/2012 04:19:48 PM 671 Views
As long as it is equitable - 20/10/2012 05:55:57 PM 662 Views
The state shouldn't even recognize marriage beyond name changes anyway - 21/10/2012 03:52:40 AM 733 Views
Indeed - 21/10/2012 06:04:41 AM 791 Views
I don't give a damn what you call it. That's your business. - 21/10/2012 06:17:40 AM 1066 Views
And so? - 21/10/2012 07:05:08 AM 699 Views
Re: And so? - 21/10/2012 04:10:19 PM 866 Views
Legal contracts must be open to all consenting adults, or none. - 22/10/2012 03:11:55 PM 746 Views
You are correct, yet your reasoning is flawed. - 23/10/2012 03:20:25 PM 672 Views
Again, the Equal Protection Clause has far less force on private entities than on government. - 23/10/2012 03:52:06 PM 604 Views
Much less force, yes. - 23/10/2012 04:15:03 PM 614 Views
The crux is "If it's my business, it's my business." - 23/10/2012 04:43:25 PM 687 Views
Re: The crux is "If it's my business, it's my business." - 23/10/2012 07:15:17 PM 629 Views
Like you said: By referring to "all invididuals" (or, better, "persons" or "citizens.") - 24/10/2012 04:14:55 PM 651 Views
But we know very well that it doesn't have dire commercial consequences. - 25/10/2012 07:17:55 PM 707 Views
Depends on where you look, and for how long. - 26/10/2012 01:19:00 AM 667 Views
+1 *NM* - 23/10/2012 07:36:46 PM 309 Views
No the analogy is not exact, nor legally the same... - 23/10/2012 07:33:25 PM 581 Views
Analogy is not equality, only similarity. - 24/10/2012 04:37:29 PM 779 Views
We aren't asking for something better or different. - 23/10/2012 04:27:04 PM 673 Views
yeah, it is very circular. - 23/10/2012 07:44:33 PM 704 Views

Reply to Message