"Polygamy" is the all-inclusive term; whether or not he meant it, he said it.
Joel Send a noteboard - 22/10/2012 04:31:09 PM
A two person household is inefficient. Now if you take 5 people, you have a much better efficiency curve for raising children.
I also assume that by polygamy you mean multiple people, not just multiple wives. The problem with polygamy is it comes from a place of deeply unequal social positions for men and women, and is harmful to society.
I also assume that by polygamy you mean multiple people, not just multiple wives. The problem with polygamy is it comes from a place of deeply unequal social positions for men and women, and is harmful to society.
All the same Equal Protection arguments apply; legally recognizing polygyny requires the same for polyandry.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
For all you supporters of Gay Marriage: What about polygamy?
- 20/10/2012 12:02:06 AM
1371 Views
Legal rights.
- 20/10/2012 12:14:10 AM
780 Views
should be legal, would be nice for poly people. should include polygyny and polyandry. *NM*
- 20/10/2012 03:29:05 AM
376 Views
Government needs to stop legislating morality. So yes *NM*
- 20/10/2012 03:36:37 AM
368 Views
That's a huge chunk of what government does.
- 20/10/2012 04:35:45 PM
708 Views
That's not what I'm saying
- 21/10/2012 03:21:08 AM
724 Views
So you're opposed to abortion and gun control then? Welcome aboard!
- 21/10/2012 06:14:14 AM
673 Views
Why do you keep talking about gay marriage and polygamy in the same sentence..
- 20/10/2012 03:58:26 AM
750 Views
Get a grip. Your response is just what I tried to avoid.
- 20/10/2012 04:33:40 AM
668 Views
The more fool you.
- 21/10/2012 05:55:30 AM
761 Views
This, and legal recognition of it, is precisely why marriage has become an Equal Protection issue.
- 22/10/2012 03:40:01 PM
696 Views
*NM*
Because they are both violations of the paradigm of genuine marriage. Like it or not.
- 21/10/2012 05:49:32 AM
652 Views
I have no problem with polygamy being legal, but marriage is a privilege and can be limited to two.
- 20/10/2012 04:16:08 AM
758 Views
The only problem with that is that it was established with a heterosexist assumption
- 21/10/2012 06:33:32 AM
719 Views
From a legal perspective, all of your arguments are irrelevant
- 21/10/2012 03:12:39 PM
824 Views
This really is blatantly obvious, but still it might bear repeating...
- 21/10/2012 04:43:13 PM
715 Views
Yes, but only if its equal. Multi-people relationships should be more acceptable by society.
- 20/10/2012 05:15:24 AM
771 Views
*NM*
"Polygamy" is the all-inclusive term; whether or not he meant it, he said it.
- 22/10/2012 04:31:09 PM
660 Views
I support autogamy in addition to various forms of exogenic relationships
- 20/10/2012 05:49:07 AM
693 Views
Have you seen the Glee episode where Sue Sylvester conducts a marriage of herself to herself? *NM*
- 20/10/2012 09:50:32 AM
366 Views
I am fine with it if all existing parties to the marriage consent to each addition.
- 20/10/2012 10:10:19 AM
765 Views
The case for polygamy has really weakened rather than strenghtened, you might say.
- 20/10/2012 03:53:34 PM
867 Views
I have no problem with it, but as Amy says, it's not really relevant. *NM*
- 20/10/2012 05:40:50 PM
394 Views
Legalize polygamy and create a familymaking process, but don't cover polygamy under marriage.
- 20/10/2012 10:14:58 PM
686 Views
The state shouldn't even recognize marriage beyond name changes anyway
- 21/10/2012 03:52:40 AM
737 Views
Indeed
- 21/10/2012 06:04:41 AM
793 Views
I don't give a damn what you call it. That's your business.
- 21/10/2012 06:17:40 AM
1069 Views
And so?
- 21/10/2012 07:05:08 AM
701 Views
Re: And so?
- 21/10/2012 04:10:19 PM
867 Views
So can we call it garriage, give the same legal effect and call it good? *NM*
- 22/10/2012 03:28:33 AM
373 Views
According to your argument we could afford gay couples the same legal privileges...
- 22/10/2012 03:20:17 AM
632 Views
"...separate educational facilities are inherently unequal."
- 22/10/2012 04:45:31 PM
691 Views
That may well be the ideal solution. And also the most ironically amusing in how it would fail.
- 22/10/2012 07:35:05 PM
663 Views
We already went there and did that in '04, and yes, it was funny as f--k.
- 22/10/2012 09:51:49 PM
610 Views
Agreed in principle, but custody/cohabitation/assets go well beyond name change.
- 22/10/2012 04:37:09 PM
668 Views
This is the sort of thing that *needs* to be about principle
- 23/10/2012 04:54:10 AM
603 Views
Parental, property and other rights need government protection, and thus government involvement.
- 23/10/2012 05:14:37 AM
648 Views
Legal contracts must be open to all consenting adults, or none.
- 22/10/2012 03:11:55 PM
748 Views
You are correct, yet your reasoning is flawed.
- 23/10/2012 03:20:25 PM
675 Views
Again, the Equal Protection Clause has far less force on private entities than on government.
- 23/10/2012 03:52:06 PM
606 Views
Much less force, yes.
- 23/10/2012 04:15:03 PM
615 Views
The crux is "If it's my business, it's my business."
- 23/10/2012 04:43:25 PM
687 Views
Re: The crux is "If it's my business, it's my business."
- 23/10/2012 07:15:17 PM
631 Views
Like you said: By referring to "all invididuals" (or, better, "persons" or "citizens.")
- 24/10/2012 04:14:55 PM
653 Views
But we know very well that it doesn't have dire commercial consequences.
- 25/10/2012 07:17:55 PM
708 Views
I have several friends who practice polyamory, if they wanted to marry I would support it. *NM*
- 24/10/2012 06:47:58 PM
339 Views