However, here is a new rule for general life based on the call from the end of tonight's game: If you are holding your baby and I walk up and grab your baby, I own your baby.
Like I say, I REALLY want to see this play, because when you put it like that, that is actually true on a football field: If a player on one team takes a ball away from a player on the other before the whistle blows, forward progress is stopped; before the ball carrier is DOWN, the player who strips the ball gains possession. In the case of receivers stripping defenders that is doubly so, because when possession is contested, simultaneous possession goes to the RECEIVER (one of many football rules favoring the offense.)
So if that how it is actually went—the Packers DB did not take a knee, go out of bounds or otherwise end the play before stripped—yeah, that sounds like a TD.
The DB had possession first and then Golden Tate gained co-possession as they were coming down. The rule is that the ball goes to the passing team if they gain control simultaneously.... which they did not. Or at least, it appeared that way to me.
Tates left hand is between Jennings'; it is physically impossible for Jennings to catch the ball with both hands unless Tates left hand is on it, too. His right hand (though it is hard to see on the YouTube clip (try 0:57-5

That clip makes me less certain Tate had his left hand on the ball the whole time Jennings was catching it (since it looks like his left hand was, at least at one point, below rather than between Jennings') but it is hard to be sure, and replay reversal requires "incontrovertible" evidence, not inconclusive. It is also hard to be sure from that clip Jennings was ever down even if he DID have sole possession, so Tate could still have legally stripped him even if he did NOT have simultaneous possession.
Had I been on the field, I would have made the same call, perforce; had I been in the replay booth, I also could not have overturned it.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
This message last edited by Joel on 26/09/2012 at 02:33:35 AM
/NFL: now that replacement refs have cost the packers a win, can we please get the real ones back? *NM*
25/09/2012 05:14:58 AM
- 684 Views
Link? Clip?
25/09/2012 05:27:07 AM
- 703 Views
Let's just say that Gruden used the word "Jobbed" in the live telecast. *NM*
25/09/2012 05:35:08 AM
- 436 Views
Here's a link.
25/09/2012 05:36:56 AM
- 795 Views
Yes and no; that is the link I referenced in my post.
25/09/2012 05:47:07 AM
- 620 Views
youtube link
25/09/2012 07:00:29 AM
- 813 Views
Thanks; that looks like a textbook case of simultaneous possession, which goes to the receiver: TD.
25/09/2012 07:29:28 AM
- 702 Views
pete carroll is a cheating douchebag, you cannot take his word for what happened
25/09/2012 10:59:33 AM
- 968 Views
I did not; I watched the clip: Simultaneous possession, which goes to the receiver.
26/09/2012 01:30:18 AM
- 1310 Views
watch a better replay if you can
26/09/2012 02:38:17 AM
- 768 Views
Have now; still not convinced.
26/09/2012 04:01:23 AM
- 812 Views
also, the pass interference on tate that wasn't called is clear at 0:56 in that clip
25/09/2012 11:27:36 AM
- 778 Views
Tate was looking for the ball, and raised his hands to catch it, not push off Sam Shields.
26/09/2012 01:33:46 AM
- 735 Views
watch a better replay and get back to me on this one.
26/09/2012 02:36:43 AM
- 778 Views
Where did the NFL head office acknowledge that?
26/09/2012 03:52:36 AM
- 868 Views
in their official response to the whole incident....?
26/09/2012 04:14:52 AM
- 1001 Views
Fair enough then; the NFLs official position is that offensive PI should have been called.
26/09/2012 04:45:58 AM
- 781 Views
Yeah, if one hand counts as possession
25/09/2012 05:15:37 PM
- 791 Views
Left hand between Jennings' arms and on the ball; right was outside Jennings' arm and on the ball.
26/09/2012 01:38:28 AM
- 726 Views
How have you not seen this play? Are you in a cave? *NM*
25/09/2012 03:57:55 PM
- 375 Views
No, I am in Norway, where NFL coverage is rather limited.
26/09/2012 01:40:07 AM
- 911 Views
While you can hardly blame the replacement refs because they are basically trainees...
25/09/2012 06:05:22 AM
- 885 Views
Now I really want to see this play.
25/09/2012 06:27:42 AM
- 879 Views
Re: Now I really want to see this play.
25/09/2012 02:48:56 PM
- 795 Views
I have still only seen the YouTube clip, but it looked like they both had both hands on the ball.
26/09/2012 01:58:27 AM
- 713 Views
There are good views on nfl.com. Will link.
26/09/2012 02:16:51 AM
- 860 Views
Thanks; I still do not see much to change my mind.
26/09/2012 02:32:43 AM
- 791 Views
You might appreciate learning that the Lingerie Football League fired some of these refs
25/09/2012 07:19:37 AM
- 799 Views
Tie goes to the receiver - the rule for decades. The Packers benefitted from worse calls last year
25/09/2012 11:31:47 AM
- 817 Views
you probably think greedo shot first too.....
25/09/2012 01:49:03 PM
- 769 Views
Possession doesn't mean squat until you land. Tate had it by then
25/09/2012 03:13:29 PM
- 772 Views
he had nothing until they landed and he tried to pull it away. everyone but you agrees on this *NM*
25/09/2012 03:25:43 PM
- 367 Views
Not so; Cannoli and I agree on pretty much every point involved in this play.
26/09/2012 02:17:01 AM
- 745 Views
They can't reverse that call.
25/09/2012 04:43:28 PM
- 853 Views
the only possible way was to rule it incomplete
25/09/2012 10:42:25 PM
- 827 Views
It was very obviously caught; you can't rule that incomplete.
25/09/2012 11:06:17 PM
- 745 Views
my philosophy is "interception = incomplete" but i think that's only for stats purposes
26/09/2012 12:32:43 AM
- 717 Views
Congrats Cannoli, you are the only person (thing?) in the country who thinks it's a TD *NM*
25/09/2012 03:53:18 PM
- 501 Views
I'm not even the only person in this thread, moron. *NM*
25/09/2012 04:07:48 PM
- 408 Views
Joel hasn't even seen the play, douchebag *NM*
25/09/2012 04:12:35 PM
- 375 Views
I have seen enough of it, and while I did not write Cannolis response, I easily could have.
26/09/2012 02:06:45 AM
- 765 Views
Slightly (very) loopy yet entertaining piece on why Ayn Rand is to blame for all of this.
25/09/2012 05:38:12 PM
- 701 Views
She hates revenue sharing, salary caps & the draft, too, but the Pack would be screwed without each.
26/09/2012 03:34:00 AM
- 724 Views
Here's the proof Cannoli is refusing to see
25/09/2012 05:54:07 PM
- 824 Views
Clearer shot, but stills do not allow us to see where Tates hands were at all times.
26/09/2012 02:10:25 AM
- 633 Views
you can't claim "good ol' strip" *AND* simultaneous catch -- which is it?
26/09/2012 02:35:41 AM
- 1066 Views
I do not claim both: I claim simultaneous catch but IF not, then strip.
26/09/2012 03:51:47 AM
- 1052 Views
you sure you saw the right replay?
26/09/2012 04:21:57 AM
- 748 Views
Think so, yeah.
26/09/2012 04:58:15 AM
- 870 Views
from another angle -- pun intended
26/09/2012 04:01:54 PM
- 743 Views
There are two separate issues: 1) Was it a simultaneous catch; 2) IF not, was it a strip?
27/09/2012 08:54:52 AM
- 918 Views
your opinion is against pretty much everyone in the world, so..... *shrug*
27/09/2012 03:55:33 PM
- 971 Views
Thanks; I did not expect you to give in so easily.
27/09/2012 10:14:30 PM
- 779 Views
did you even read that article???
28/09/2012 12:35:39 AM
- 790 Views
"his control wasn’t established again...."
28/09/2012 01:08:03 AM
- 1078 Views
wow, what a thorough analysis you sent me
either way, you're still wrong
28/09/2012 02:05:24 AM
- 869 Views


Worst calls are made all the time by the regular officials.
26/09/2012 01:23:57 AM
- 735 Views
yes, but not usually more than one per game, certainly not several in a single weekend.... *NM*
26/09/2012 02:39:56 AM
- 379 Views