Jennings made the grab with two hands, pulling the ball to his chest, and keeping it there as he fell to the ground. Tate had a hand on it. So, Jennings, not Tate, had possession, so "dual possession" does not apply.
The two refs on the scene called touchdown and interception simultaneously. So, even though replay cannot overturn a possession call on the field, there was no clear call on the field.
These refs are atrocious. You are incapable of seeing it because the refs being replaced are in a union, a word that makes you see red. Like the NFL, you seem to be willing to look over nearly anything instead of seeing that, sometimes, union workers are the clearly preferable option.
The two refs on the scene called touchdown and interception simultaneously. So, even though replay cannot overturn a possession call on the field, there was no clear call on the field.
These refs are atrocious. You are incapable of seeing it because the refs being replaced are in a union, a word that makes you see red. Like the NFL, you seem to be willing to look over nearly anything instead of seeing that, sometimes, union workers are the clearly preferable option.
Eschew Verbosity
A good point regarding the replacement officials
- 24/09/2012 02:55:12 PM
941 Views
"still doesn’t understand how timeouts or challenges work. Advantage: replacement refs." REALLY?!
- 24/09/2012 07:21:41 PM
647 Views
You see what you did, Cannoli? You made me agree with Joel 
*NM*
- 24/09/2012 07:41:02 PM
187 Views
*NM*
- 24/09/2012 07:41:02 PM
187 Views
Only fair; you and rt made me agree with Cannoli in the Eli vs. Romo threads. 
- 24/09/2012 11:35:22 PM
570 Views
- 24/09/2012 11:35:22 PM
570 Views
And here's a straight-up "caused one team to be able to win" situation:
- 24/09/2012 09:39:33 PM
698 Views
"it's a basic expectation of any referee to maintain an accurate line of scrimmage."
- 24/09/2012 11:43:06 PM
667 Views
And there you have it. (Monday Night Football update.)
- 25/09/2012 05:18:37 AM
479 Views
That was the right call. "Union" has nothing to do with it.
- 25/09/2012 11:37:39 AM
599 Views
why the union comments at the end of your post if it had nothing to do with your argument?
- 25/09/2012 03:38:28 PM
490 Views
It was a sideline from the major point and not my motivation, as Dannymac insinuates.
- 25/09/2012 04:09:48 PM
492 Views
No, it was not. And yes, it does.
- 25/09/2012 05:11:52 PM
395 Views
The replay officals are not replacements. Maybe Rodgers just isn't a clutch QB *NM*
- 25/09/2012 11:44:29 AM
205 Views
Hmm?
- 25/09/2012 05:01:26 PM
457 Views
He was being sarcastic. See our earlier posts about Romo and Eli Manning *NM*
- 25/09/2012 05:21:16 PM
189 Views
Maybe Rodgers should have played at his apparent high level of play the entire game. *NM*
- 26/09/2012 01:52:40 AM
199 Views
maybe people should rate QB simply by which team wins the game *NM*
- 26/09/2012 05:43:04 PM
197 Views
QBs should in part be rated on wins. I mean, that is afterall the result desired.
- 27/09/2012 02:36:04 PM
502 Views
I agree with Cannoli, sadly. These officials are not much worse if at all.
- 26/09/2012 01:51:30 AM
646 Views
there is a huge difference between blowing a call and not understanding the rules of the game
- 25/09/2012 03:35:44 PM
473 Views