Active Users:370 Time:21/04/2025 12:40:29 PM
Just so you can get this information without namecalling ... Nate Send a noteboard - 25/09/2012 04:18:41 PM
... Orange linked Joel to a Youtube clip of the play above in this thread, and after watching it Joel said that it looked like a touchdown to him.

I don't have enough familiarity with NFL rules to weigh in myself.
Warder to starry_nite

Chapterfish — Nate's Writing Blog
http://chapterfish.wordpress.com
Reply to message
/NFL: now that replacement refs have cost the packers a win, can we please get the real ones back? *NM* - 25/09/2012 05:14:58 AM 684 Views
I was gonna keep it to one thread, but hell, I'll join yours. - 25/09/2012 05:24:26 AM 749 Views
Link? Clip? - 25/09/2012 05:27:07 AM 703 Views
Let's just say that Gruden used the word "Jobbed" in the live telecast. *NM* - 25/09/2012 05:35:08 AM 436 Views
Here's a link. - 25/09/2012 05:36:56 AM 796 Views
Yes and no; that is the link I referenced in my post. - 25/09/2012 05:47:07 AM 621 Views
Re: Yes and no; that is the link I referenced in my post. - 25/09/2012 05:52:55 AM 851 Views
Re: Yes and no; that is the link I referenced in my post. - 25/09/2012 06:13:46 AM 807 Views
youtube link - 25/09/2012 07:00:29 AM 813 Views
Thanks; that looks like a textbook case of simultaneous possession, which goes to the receiver: TD. - 25/09/2012 07:29:28 AM 702 Views
pete carroll is a cheating douchebag, you cannot take his word for what happened - 25/09/2012 10:59:33 AM 968 Views
I did not; I watched the clip: Simultaneous possession, which goes to the receiver. - 26/09/2012 01:30:18 AM 1310 Views
watch a better replay if you can - 26/09/2012 02:38:17 AM 768 Views
Have now; still not convinced. - 26/09/2012 04:01:23 AM 813 Views
that's ok. you're still wrong - 26/09/2012 04:12:56 AM 828 Views
I know you are but what am I? *MN* - 26/09/2012 04:48:47 AM 769 Views
How have you not seen this play? Are you in a cave? *NM* - 25/09/2012 03:57:55 PM 376 Views
No, I am in Norway, where NFL coverage is rather limited. - 26/09/2012 01:40:07 AM 911 Views
Wait, you're not in Houston? *NM* - 26/09/2012 01:42:45 AM 394 Views
Not since the Texas Sesquicentennial, no. - 26/09/2012 01:45:29 AM 683 Views
While you can hardly blame the replacement refs because they are basically trainees... - 25/09/2012 06:05:22 AM 885 Views
Now I really want to see this play. - 25/09/2012 06:27:42 AM 879 Views
Re: Now I really want to see this play. - 25/09/2012 02:48:56 PM 795 Views
I have still only seen the YouTube clip, but it looked like they both had both hands on the ball. - 26/09/2012 01:58:27 AM 713 Views
There are good views on nfl.com. Will link. - 26/09/2012 02:16:51 AM 860 Views
Thanks; I still do not see much to change my mind. - 26/09/2012 02:32:43 AM 792 Views
The last call was a joke. - 25/09/2012 06:52:59 AM 739 Views
Tie goes to the receiver - the rule for decades. The Packers benefitted from worse calls last year - 25/09/2012 11:31:47 AM 817 Views
you probably think greedo shot first too..... - 25/09/2012 01:49:03 PM 770 Views
They can't reverse that call. - 25/09/2012 04:43:28 PM 853 Views
the only possible way was to rule it incomplete - 25/09/2012 10:42:25 PM 827 Views
Congrats Cannoli, you are the only person (thing?) in the country who thinks it's a TD *NM* - 25/09/2012 03:53:18 PM 501 Views
I'm not even the only person in this thread, moron. *NM* - 25/09/2012 04:07:48 PM 409 Views
Joel hasn't even seen the play, douchebag *NM* - 25/09/2012 04:12:35 PM 375 Views
Just so you can get this information without namecalling ... - 25/09/2012 04:18:41 PM 741 Views
No I mean he hasn't seen the replay over and over on ESPN *NM* - 25/09/2012 04:21:46 PM 382 Views
Interesting. What is the rule with arguing refs? - 25/09/2012 05:18:35 PM 683 Views
That response was disturbingly like my thoughts on the play. - 26/09/2012 01:49:37 AM 780 Views
As a Seahawks fan. - 25/09/2012 02:10:58 PM 732 Views
No. Not with that attitude. *NM* - 25/09/2012 04:03:32 PM 359 Views
*throws public tantrum* *NM* - 25/09/2012 10:39:22 PM 346 Views
Here's the proof Cannoli is refusing to see - 25/09/2012 05:54:07 PM 825 Views
Clearer shot, but stills do not allow us to see where Tates hands were at all times. - 26/09/2012 02:10:25 AM 634 Views
you can't claim "good ol' strip" *AND* simultaneous catch -- which is it? - 26/09/2012 02:35:41 AM 1066 Views
I do not claim both: I claim simultaneous catch but IF not, then strip. - 26/09/2012 03:51:47 AM 1052 Views
you sure you saw the right replay? - 26/09/2012 04:21:57 AM 748 Views
Think so, yeah. - 26/09/2012 04:58:15 AM 870 Views
from another angle -- pun intended - 26/09/2012 04:01:54 PM 744 Views
There are two separate issues: 1) Was it a simultaneous catch; 2) IF not, was it a strip? - 27/09/2012 08:54:52 AM 918 Views
your opinion is against pretty much everyone in the world, so..... *shrug* - 27/09/2012 03:55:33 PM 971 Views
Thanks; I did not expect you to give in so easily. - 27/09/2012 10:14:30 PM 779 Views
did you even read that article??? - 28/09/2012 12:35:39 AM 791 Views
"his control wasn’t established again...." - 28/09/2012 01:08:03 AM 1078 Views
wow, what a thorough analysis you sent me either way, you're still wrong - 28/09/2012 02:05:24 AM 869 Views
That is not an argument. - 28/09/2012 02:26:58 AM 681 Views

Reply to Message