why the union comments at the end of your post if it had nothing to do with your argument?
moondog Send a noteboard - 25/09/2012 03:38:28 PM
Pressuring the the league into knuckling under to the officials' demands will not greatly improve the quality of the game, possibly not even in the short-term (as the replacements get better, and the unionists' skills deteriorate with unuse), and it will be another cost to be passed onto the fans. And the officials' union will gain clout, prestige, moral authority, whatever you want to call it, and officiating reforms will be even harder to put through, as the union resists anything that might embarass or replace its constituency.
what is all this about if you're not trying to make an anti-union argument?
"The RIAA has shown a certain disregard for the creative people of the industry in their eagerness to protect the revenues of the record companies." -- Frank Zappa
"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
A good point regarding the replacement officials
24/09/2012 02:55:12 PM
- 868 Views
"still doesn’t understand how timeouts or challenges work. Advantage: replacement refs." REALLY?!
24/09/2012 07:21:41 PM
- 558 Views
You see what you did, Cannoli? You made me agree with Joel *NM*
24/09/2012 07:41:02 PM
- 160 Views
Only fair; you and rt made me agree with Cannoli in the Eli vs. Romo threads.
24/09/2012 11:35:22 PM
- 505 Views
And here's a straight-up "caused one team to be able to win" situation:
24/09/2012 09:39:33 PM
- 631 Views
"it's a basic expectation of any referee to maintain an accurate line of scrimmage."
24/09/2012 11:43:06 PM
- 597 Views
And there you have it. (Monday Night Football update.)
25/09/2012 05:18:37 AM
- 415 Views
That was the right call. "Union" has nothing to do with it.
25/09/2012 11:37:39 AM
- 531 Views
why the union comments at the end of your post if it had nothing to do with your argument?
25/09/2012 03:38:28 PM
- 422 Views
It was a sideline from the major point and not my motivation, as Dannymac insinuates.
25/09/2012 04:09:48 PM
- 418 Views
The replay officals are not replacements. Maybe Rodgers just isn't a clutch QB *NM*
25/09/2012 11:44:29 AM
- 187 Views
Hmm?
25/09/2012 05:01:26 PM
- 391 Views
He was being sarcastic. See our earlier posts about Romo and Eli Manning *NM*
25/09/2012 05:21:16 PM
- 162 Views
Maybe Rodgers should have played at his apparent high level of play the entire game. *NM*
26/09/2012 01:52:40 AM
- 175 Views
maybe people should rate QB simply by which team wins the game *NM*
26/09/2012 05:43:04 PM
- 169 Views
QBs should in part be rated on wins. I mean, that is afterall the result desired.
27/09/2012 02:36:04 PM
- 429 Views
I agree with Cannoli, sadly. These officials are not much worse if at all.
26/09/2012 01:51:30 AM
- 570 Views
there is a huge difference between blowing a call and not understanding the rules of the game
25/09/2012 03:35:44 PM
- 408 Views