"it's a basic expectation of any referee to maintain an accurate line of scrimmage."
Joel Send a noteboard - 24/09/2012 11:43:06 PM
One would think that would fall into the "NO S--T!" category, but....
Nice of that articles author to link another on the Vikings game where the refs gave SF a fourth time out AND two extra challenges. Comedy of errors.
EDIT: The second article linked to a third, also about the '9ers/Vikes game, where the refs screwed up the KICKOFF by calling the kicking team for an illegal block (even though the kicking team has no ball carrier for which TO block.) At least they caught that one, though there remains some confusion over whether they meant to call the Vikings for an actual illegal block but simply picked up the flag in embarrassment after inadvertently calling it on the '9ers.
Nice of that articles author to link another on the Vikings game where the refs gave SF a fourth time out AND two extra challenges. Comedy of errors.
EDIT: The second article linked to a third, also about the '9ers/Vikes game, where the refs screwed up the KICKOFF by calling the kicking team for an illegal block (even though the kicking team has no ball carrier for which TO block.) At least they caught that one, though there remains some confusion over whether they meant to call the Vikings for an actual illegal block but simply picked up the flag in embarrassment after inadvertently calling it on the '9ers.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
This message last edited by Joel on 24/09/2012 at 11:45:53 PM
A good point regarding the replacement officials
- 24/09/2012 02:55:12 PM
869 Views
"still doesn’t understand how timeouts or challenges work. Advantage: replacement refs." REALLY?!
- 24/09/2012 07:21:41 PM
560 Views
You see what you did, Cannoli? You made me agree with Joel 
*NM*
- 24/09/2012 07:41:02 PM
160 Views
*NM*
- 24/09/2012 07:41:02 PM
160 Views
Only fair; you and rt made me agree with Cannoli in the Eli vs. Romo threads. 
- 24/09/2012 11:35:22 PM
506 Views
- 24/09/2012 11:35:22 PM
506 Views
And here's a straight-up "caused one team to be able to win" situation:
- 24/09/2012 09:39:33 PM
631 Views
"it's a basic expectation of any referee to maintain an accurate line of scrimmage."
- 24/09/2012 11:43:06 PM
599 Views
And there you have it. (Monday Night Football update.)
- 25/09/2012 05:18:37 AM
416 Views
That was the right call. "Union" has nothing to do with it.
- 25/09/2012 11:37:39 AM
531 Views
why the union comments at the end of your post if it had nothing to do with your argument?
- 25/09/2012 03:38:28 PM
423 Views
It was a sideline from the major point and not my motivation, as Dannymac insinuates.
- 25/09/2012 04:09:48 PM
418 Views
The replay officals are not replacements. Maybe Rodgers just isn't a clutch QB *NM*
- 25/09/2012 11:44:29 AM
187 Views
Hmm?
- 25/09/2012 05:01:26 PM
391 Views
He was being sarcastic. See our earlier posts about Romo and Eli Manning *NM*
- 25/09/2012 05:21:16 PM
162 Views
Maybe Rodgers should have played at his apparent high level of play the entire game. *NM*
- 26/09/2012 01:52:40 AM
175 Views
maybe people should rate QB simply by which team wins the game *NM*
- 26/09/2012 05:43:04 PM
169 Views
QBs should in part be rated on wins. I mean, that is afterall the result desired.
- 27/09/2012 02:36:04 PM
429 Views
I agree with Cannoli, sadly. These officials are not much worse if at all.
- 26/09/2012 01:51:30 AM
571 Views
there is a huge difference between blowing a call and not understanding the rules of the game
- 25/09/2012 03:35:44 PM
408 Views