Logic is valid or not irrespective of the source, and if Cannoli and I can both be vitriolic and verbose at times, we also both usually have a well reasoned argument there for anyone who bothers to look. That does not necessarily mean are arguments ARE always valid, but does mean that when we take the time to write one of our little essays it almost certainly contains something more substantive than "you are an idiot because I disagree with you." Note: Sometimes the reverse occurs, but in those cases I usually try to demonstrate the idiocy of statements with which I am obliged to disagree.