Active Users:337 Time:10/04/2025 08:08:50 PM
BRIDE Tom Send a noteboard - 20/09/2012 03:39:30 PM
I do not agree with you at all that the passage could mean anything other than what the scholars are claiming. The "Bride of Christ" language always uses the word "bride" because this mirrors the "Bride of God" language of the prophets when used to describe Israel. I even looked, and looked, and found one place where the word "wife" is used in Revelation, but it's a bad translation, because the Greek original uses "bride" and not "wife" there as well. I then followed all those passages in the Coptic and they are uniform in the use of "bride". There is a very good reason, too - the relationship between Christ and His Church is ever fresh and new, always a celebration and a feast; he is forever the bridegroom and the Church is forever the bride. The "honeymoon" never ends.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
So, about this silly "Jesus' wife" story making the rounds... - 19/09/2012 10:55:55 PM 1303 Views
That's right! Jesus' position on marriage was "One man, no woman." *NM* - 19/09/2012 11:05:55 PM 583 Views
What is the context? The canonical bible says Christ has a wife: The Church. - 19/09/2012 11:25:19 PM 939 Views
Oh please...don't confuse "wife" with "bride" - 19/09/2012 11:35:09 PM 912 Views
What word do the Prophets use for Israels relationship to God? - 20/09/2012 12:38:20 AM 884 Views
BRIDE - 20/09/2012 03:39:30 PM 873 Views
Two things why it is important - 20/09/2012 04:24:37 AM 861 Views
There is a very good reason no one dismissed the illegitmate gospels as illegitimate until 180 AD: - 20/09/2012 09:15:05 PM 823 Views
The Gospel of Thomas was written before 180 AD. - 20/09/2012 09:33:44 PM 816 Views
What is the oldest extant text of or reference to it? - 20/09/2012 11:11:03 PM 892 Views
The Oxyrhynchus fragments were dated to c. 200 AD, and they are copies - 21/09/2012 12:18:33 AM 810 Views
I would buy 200 AD, of course. - 21/09/2012 12:58:32 AM 874 Views
It's not about "buying" it - it's essentially proven at that point. - 21/09/2012 03:26:50 AM 843 Views
Yes; all I meant was that I never disputed a date around 200 AD. - 22/09/2012 12:25:41 AM 861 Views
I don't think any of the gospels were written by their purported authors. - 22/09/2012 03:36:32 AM 775 Views
Not even Mark or Luke? - 22/09/2012 01:21:24 PM 816 Views
Well, but everyone knew Peter didn't speak Greek - 22/09/2012 09:46:57 PM 761 Views
What about those who postulate a mid-to-late 1st century composition? - 22/09/2012 02:21:18 AM 889 Views
Elaine Pagels ceased to be an impartial academic a long time ago. - 22/09/2012 03:41:41 AM 845 Views
Suspected as much, but wanted to see if you thought so as well - 22/09/2012 03:47:05 AM 988 Views
Let's not get started on Funk - 22/09/2012 09:48:05 PM 778 Views
So true - 22/09/2012 10:23:08 PM 886 Views
don't these people have anything better to do? - 20/09/2012 11:39:35 PM 821 Views
Clearly not. - 22/09/2012 12:27:29 AM 722 Views
then i'll escape this thread before anyone twigs - 22/09/2012 08:12:37 PM 892 Views
Too late, I have already twigged, branched and treed. - 22/09/2012 08:58:39 PM 867 Views
I know! - 21/09/2012 06:48:33 AM 996 Views
See, Tom, you made a mistake. - 22/09/2012 10:25:22 AM 854 Views

Reply to Message