Active Users:1129 Time:23/11/2024 04:11:13 AM
Those are toothless examples, no bite to them and old news so no shock value aspect Isaac Send a noteboard - 19/09/2012 08:44:01 AM
... I'm kind of curious why he hasn't just released everything. Not doing so suggests that there's something in there that his campaign feels would be more damaging than the unproven perception that he's hiding something. I mean, I dunno, but after all the fuss, why wouldn't he just release them? It's strange enough to make me mildly curious, anyway.

An example of something totally legal and ethical that could get someone into trouble politically would be Obama investing in a Coal Mine or Romney in a Solar Start Up. The left is just fishing, there's always a chance in someone with as much investment as Romney has of some tax error but more there's a chance of a legal action that might be turned into a political issue.


For example, we already have multiple signatures of his on documents where Bain purchased and ran a company which disposed of abortion remains, but that's neither here nor there.


Stericycle disposes of 'medical waste', blood, needles, presumably amputated limbs, etc. It never gained traction because it was silly and the people pushing it assume most pro-lifers are drooling fanatics, if one starts by assuming the opposition are irrational morons, one's tactics tend to suck. I'm not terribly fond of illegal needle drugs but I'd bet Stericycle has disposed of a lot of them too, for that matter I love cats but I am not going to throw a fit at the guy who owns the company that pickups dead roadkill. Hence it never stirred much anger.

Personal guess is that he's one of the many super-rich who ended up getting amnesty in....'09, I think it was, for disclosing an illegal offshore account. I do think it's kinda sad that the sanitized to look good year only had an effective tax of 13%, but that's neither here nor there.


Key word there: 'guess', I personally guess that Obama finds his transcripts embarrassing and thus doesn't release them, my guess is either he did worse overall grade-wise then his 'professor' image could bear, or he took a class someone is worried would hurt his image, either by content or actual grade. I can say, with great confidence but not certainty, that he sees no advantage to releasing them and the same for Romney... what I can't do is say - with any credibility anyway - 'my guess is Obama took econ and got a C and took a course on Marxism and Communist Theory and got an A', because that's called wild-ass speculation and rumor-mongering.
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein

King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
Reply to message
what does it mean to "pay no federal income tax"? - 18/09/2012 06:30:28 PM 962 Views
Wrong - 18/09/2012 06:37:07 PM 536 Views
Additional categories - 18/09/2012 06:51:46 PM 626 Views
SS income is very much taxed, my friend - 18/09/2012 06:59:28 PM 505 Views
Re: SS income is very much taxed, my friend - 18/09/2012 07:22:35 PM 503 Views
The wealthy get their income from investments - 18/09/2012 07:33:55 PM 574 Views
ok - 19/09/2012 05:46:49 AM 606 Views
Is that true? - 18/09/2012 06:54:33 PM 550 Views
No, it's not. See my post (you should really have read it first ) *NM* - 18/09/2012 07:00:07 PM 214 Views
No - 18/09/2012 06:56:43 PM 526 Views
While we're talking about taxes, am I the only one who doesn't give a rat's ass about Romney's? - 18/09/2012 10:37:12 PM 489 Views
That sort of thing does matter to me - 18/09/2012 10:48:30 PM 459 Views
Ah, yeah, not so much for me. - 18/09/2012 11:16:56 PM 430 Views
You gave that away with your first post - 18/09/2012 11:49:28 PM 414 Views
No way! - 19/09/2012 01:41:04 PM 454 Views
Yuh huh! - 19/09/2012 08:56:01 PM 481 Views
As an outside observer ... - 19/09/2012 01:28:13 AM 504 Views
Re: As an outside observer ... - 19/09/2012 04:45:11 AM 457 Views
the question of legality has already been covered by the offshore accounts though.... - 19/09/2012 05:44:28 AM 487 Views
Different situation then the Birther stuff - 19/09/2012 07:02:09 AM 432 Views
Eh, those already exist, if people bothered to look - 19/09/2012 08:08:35 AM 652 Views
Those are toothless examples, no bite to them and old news so no shock value aspect - 19/09/2012 08:44:01 AM 422 Views
It's a conflict of interest. - 21/09/2012 09:52:58 PM 435 Views
I think you got it wrong: - 19/09/2012 01:52:30 AM 444 Views
+1 - you are correct, moondog screwed the pooch with this post. *NM* - 19/09/2012 05:18:19 AM 199 Views
Easier to read/understand - WSJ data on the 47% - 19/09/2012 05:25:01 AM 594 Views

Reply to Message