Active Users:1168 Time:22/11/2024 11:41:43 PM
If it helps, here's a graph of effective federal tax rate by quintile, all taxes (data from 2007) Jragghen Send a noteboard - 19/09/2012 08:30:37 AM
Link is the clickable one at the bottom.

Includes Federal Income (and offsets), payroll, and excise taxes. As you can see, due to the progressive nature of federal income taxes, up until the top quintile (the bars mark, if I'm not mistaken, Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4, next 10%, next 5%, top 5% - including the top 400, and the top 400 separate), where it plateaus and starts to drop again, because such an insignificant portion of their wealth comes from income as opposed to other means (capital gains, etc).

State and local taxes are usually regressive (numbers from 2007 as well):

http://www.policyshop.net/storage/Demos-Stateandlocaltaxrates.png?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1333977357388

which only tends to exacerbate the problem.

Noteworthy exclusions from these lists: corporate taxes (which depends on whether you consider them to be property of the top tenth of a percent or so, or separate entities), and one-time taxes (estate tax in particular) which are often cited as well, but are rather disingenuous for an annual graph.


So basically, the poor benefit somewhat from the progressive federal tax, as they're intended to, as they have practically no money to spend on necessities. Tax rate increases as your income increases, until you reach a certain threshold at about 6 figures, where (in large part due to the tax cuts on the upper end since Eisenhower, coupled with low long-term capital gains taxes) the effective tax rate starts dropping to where the rich not only have more money to start with, but they're paying less on it than those in lower tiers.
Link
Reply to message
what does it mean to "pay no federal income tax"? - 18/09/2012 06:30:28 PM 961 Views
Wrong - 18/09/2012 06:37:07 PM 533 Views
Additional categories - 18/09/2012 06:51:46 PM 624 Views
SS income is very much taxed, my friend - 18/09/2012 06:59:28 PM 502 Views
Re: SS income is very much taxed, my friend - 18/09/2012 07:22:35 PM 500 Views
The wealthy get their income from investments - 18/09/2012 07:33:55 PM 572 Views
ok - 19/09/2012 05:46:49 AM 605 Views
Is that true? - 18/09/2012 06:54:33 PM 547 Views
No, it's not. See my post (you should really have read it first ) *NM* - 18/09/2012 07:00:07 PM 213 Views
No - 18/09/2012 06:56:43 PM 524 Views
Does that mean the correct number is that 27.6%? - 18/09/2012 07:17:46 PM 507 Views
If it helps, here's a graph of effective federal tax rate by quintile, all taxes (data from 2007) - 19/09/2012 08:30:37 AM 717 Views
While we're talking about taxes, am I the only one who doesn't give a rat's ass about Romney's? - 18/09/2012 10:37:12 PM 487 Views
That sort of thing does matter to me - 18/09/2012 10:48:30 PM 456 Views
Ah, yeah, not so much for me. - 18/09/2012 11:16:56 PM 429 Views
You gave that away with your first post - 18/09/2012 11:49:28 PM 412 Views
No way! - 19/09/2012 01:41:04 PM 452 Views
Yuh huh! - 19/09/2012 08:56:01 PM 479 Views
As an outside observer ... - 19/09/2012 01:28:13 AM 502 Views
Re: As an outside observer ... - 19/09/2012 04:45:11 AM 455 Views
the question of legality has already been covered by the offshore accounts though.... - 19/09/2012 05:44:28 AM 485 Views
Different situation then the Birther stuff - 19/09/2012 07:02:09 AM 429 Views
It's a conflict of interest. - 21/09/2012 09:52:58 PM 434 Views
I think you got it wrong: - 19/09/2012 01:52:30 AM 444 Views
+1 - you are correct, moondog screwed the pooch with this post. *NM* - 19/09/2012 05:18:19 AM 199 Views
Easier to read/understand - WSJ data on the 47% - 19/09/2012 05:25:01 AM 593 Views

Reply to Message