Active Users:939 Time:26/11/2024 08:34:38 PM
the question of legality has already been covered by the offshore accounts though.... moondog Send a noteboard - 19/09/2012 05:44:28 AM
... I'm kind of curious why he hasn't just released everything. Not doing so suggests that there's something in there that his campaign feels would be more damaging than the unproven perception that he's hiding something. I mean, I dunno, but after all the fuss, why wouldn't he just release them? It's strange enough to make me mildly curious, anyway.


An example of something totally legal and ethical that could get someone into trouble politically would be Obama investing in a Coal Mine or Romney in a Solar Start Up. The left is just fishing, there's always a chance in someone with as much investment as Romney has of some tax error but more there's a chance of a legal action that might be turned into a political issue.


we already know for a fact that romney has offshore tax havens and the fuss about that has been very minimal at best. if the law allows for whatever is in those returns, i'm pretty sure most people are going to just shrug and move on. the fact that it was his own father who began the tradition of releasing multiple years of returns speaks more to me than whether or not he is using legal loopholes to get out of paying taxes. the longer it gets drawn out, the more the conspiracies around them will grow.

look at the birther movement -- obama dragged it out longer than he should have and now we have actual elected officials trying to pretend he can't qualify for the ballot (e.g. -- kansas, arizona). assuming everything is legit and legal, the maelstrom surrounding these mystery returns is going to blow over quite quickly once people go through them. the fact that romney is perceived as trying to hide his personal wealth is just going to feed the rumors more than actually having the returns will.
"The RIAA has shown a certain disregard for the creative people of the industry in their eagerness to protect the revenues of the record companies." -- Frank Zappa

"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
Reply to message
what does it mean to "pay no federal income tax"? - 18/09/2012 06:30:28 PM 963 Views
Wrong - 18/09/2012 06:37:07 PM 536 Views
Additional categories - 18/09/2012 06:51:46 PM 626 Views
SS income is very much taxed, my friend - 18/09/2012 06:59:28 PM 505 Views
Re: SS income is very much taxed, my friend - 18/09/2012 07:22:35 PM 503 Views
The wealthy get their income from investments - 18/09/2012 07:33:55 PM 575 Views
ok - 19/09/2012 05:46:49 AM 607 Views
Is that true? - 18/09/2012 06:54:33 PM 550 Views
No, it's not. See my post (you should really have read it first ) *NM* - 18/09/2012 07:00:07 PM 214 Views
No - 18/09/2012 06:56:43 PM 527 Views
While we're talking about taxes, am I the only one who doesn't give a rat's ass about Romney's? - 18/09/2012 10:37:12 PM 489 Views
That sort of thing does matter to me - 18/09/2012 10:48:30 PM 459 Views
Ah, yeah, not so much for me. - 18/09/2012 11:16:56 PM 431 Views
You gave that away with your first post - 18/09/2012 11:49:28 PM 415 Views
No way! - 19/09/2012 01:41:04 PM 454 Views
Yuh huh! - 19/09/2012 08:56:01 PM 481 Views
As an outside observer ... - 19/09/2012 01:28:13 AM 504 Views
Re: As an outside observer ... - 19/09/2012 04:45:11 AM 459 Views
the question of legality has already been covered by the offshore accounts though.... - 19/09/2012 05:44:28 AM 488 Views
Different situation then the Birther stuff - 19/09/2012 07:02:09 AM 433 Views
It's a conflict of interest. - 21/09/2012 09:52:58 PM 436 Views
I think you got it wrong: - 19/09/2012 01:52:30 AM 447 Views
+1 - you are correct, moondog screwed the pooch with this post. *NM* - 19/09/2012 05:18:19 AM 199 Views
Easier to read/understand - WSJ data on the 47% - 19/09/2012 05:25:01 AM 596 Views

Reply to Message