Reason actions (those from within the last ten years) are a pretty good indicator of who someone really is, and if someone is going to be talking about tax when in a position to influence tax policy then it is quite relevant, in my opinion, to know how they actually act.
Recent, maybe?

And you think that us seeing something that hasn't (presumably) been audited as fishy by the IRS will make a difference? I think people only want to see it for the same reasons as those who want to see the Kate boobies. Or the Obama birth certificate.
what does it mean to "pay no federal income tax"?
18/09/2012 06:30:28 PM
- 1036 Views
Wrong
18/09/2012 06:37:07 PM
- 598 Views
Additional categories
18/09/2012 06:51:46 PM
- 700 Views
SS income is very much taxed, my friend
18/09/2012 06:59:28 PM
- 576 Views
Is that true?
18/09/2012 06:54:33 PM
- 614 Views
No, it's not. See my post (you should really have read it first
) *NM*
18/09/2012 07:00:07 PM
- 240 Views

Looking at that chart you linked, I have some questions.
18/09/2012 07:05:24 PM
- 561 Views
I think the reasoning is that since they go to entitlement programs, it's not entirely a tax.
18/09/2012 10:55:12 PM
- 525 Views
Does that mean the correct number is that 27.6%?
18/09/2012 07:17:46 PM
- 570 Views
That is correct - some folks have such negative income taxes, it offsets payroll as well.
19/09/2012 05:28:07 AM
- 574 Views
If it helps, here's a graph of effective federal tax rate by quintile, all taxes (data from 2007)
19/09/2012 08:30:37 AM
- 792 Views
While we're talking about taxes, am I the only one who doesn't give a rat's ass about Romney's?
18/09/2012 10:37:12 PM
- 550 Views
That sort of thing does matter to me
18/09/2012 10:48:30 PM
- 527 Views
Ah, yeah, not so much for me.
18/09/2012 11:16:56 PM
- 497 Views
I am a BIT curious whether he took the IRS amnesty for tax dodging in 2009.
18/09/2012 11:32:31 PM
- 472 Views
As an outside observer ...
19/09/2012 01:28:13 AM
- 570 Views
Re: As an outside observer ...
19/09/2012 04:45:11 AM
- 524 Views
the question of legality has already been covered by the offshore accounts though....
19/09/2012 05:44:28 AM
- 547 Views
Eh, those already exist, if people bothered to look
19/09/2012 08:08:35 AM
- 723 Views
Those are toothless examples, no bite to them and old news so no shock value aspect
19/09/2012 08:44:01 AM
- 485 Views
The stat is valid, because of tax credits the GOP created/expanded for the overtaxed middle class.
18/09/2012 11:22:13 PM
- 552 Views
I think you got it wrong:
19/09/2012 01:52:30 AM
- 514 Views
+1 - you are correct, moondog screwed the pooch with this post. *NM*
19/09/2012 05:18:19 AM
- 226 Views
Washington Post similar to Anonymous', but shows how many people get each credit.
19/09/2012 06:45:08 PM
- 603 Views