Reason actions (those from within the last ten years) are a pretty good indicator of who someone really is, and if someone is going to be talking about tax when in a position to influence tax policy then it is quite relevant, in my opinion, to know how they actually act.
Recent, maybe?
And you think that us seeing something that hasn't (presumably) been audited as fishy by the IRS will make a difference? I think people only want to see it for the same reasons as those who want to see the Kate boobies. Or the Obama birth certificate.
what does it mean to "pay no federal income tax"?
18/09/2012 06:30:28 PM
- 961 Views
Wrong
18/09/2012 06:37:07 PM
- 534 Views
Additional categories
18/09/2012 06:51:46 PM
- 626 Views
SS income is very much taxed, my friend
18/09/2012 06:59:28 PM
- 504 Views
Is that true?
18/09/2012 06:54:33 PM
- 548 Views
No, it's not. See my post (you should really have read it first ) *NM*
18/09/2012 07:00:07 PM
- 214 Views
Looking at that chart you linked, I have some questions.
18/09/2012 07:05:24 PM
- 500 Views
I think the reasoning is that since they go to entitlement programs, it's not entirely a tax.
18/09/2012 10:55:12 PM
- 450 Views
Does that mean the correct number is that 27.6%?
18/09/2012 07:17:46 PM
- 507 Views
That is correct - some folks have such negative income taxes, it offsets payroll as well.
19/09/2012 05:28:07 AM
- 509 Views
If it helps, here's a graph of effective federal tax rate by quintile, all taxes (data from 2007)
19/09/2012 08:30:37 AM
- 718 Views
While we're talking about taxes, am I the only one who doesn't give a rat's ass about Romney's?
18/09/2012 10:37:12 PM
- 487 Views
That sort of thing does matter to me
18/09/2012 10:48:30 PM
- 458 Views
Ah, yeah, not so much for me.
18/09/2012 11:16:56 PM
- 430 Views
I am a BIT curious whether he took the IRS amnesty for tax dodging in 2009.
18/09/2012 11:32:31 PM
- 412 Views
As an outside observer ...
19/09/2012 01:28:13 AM
- 503 Views
Re: As an outside observer ...
19/09/2012 04:45:11 AM
- 456 Views
the question of legality has already been covered by the offshore accounts though....
19/09/2012 05:44:28 AM
- 486 Views
Eh, those already exist, if people bothered to look
19/09/2012 08:08:35 AM
- 652 Views
Those are toothless examples, no bite to them and old news so no shock value aspect
19/09/2012 08:44:01 AM
- 420 Views
The stat is valid, because of tax credits the GOP created/expanded for the overtaxed middle class.
18/09/2012 11:22:13 PM
- 477 Views
I think you got it wrong:
19/09/2012 01:52:30 AM
- 444 Views
+1 - you are correct, moondog screwed the pooch with this post. *NM*
19/09/2012 05:18:19 AM
- 199 Views
Washington Post similar to Anonymous', but shows how many people get each credit.
19/09/2012 06:45:08 PM
- 533 Views