Active Users:1129 Time:23/11/2024 04:13:26 AM
I think the reasoning is that since they go to entitlement programs, it's not entirely a tax. Tom Send a noteboard - 18/09/2012 10:55:12 PM
At least theoretically, Social Security isn't a tax at all - it's a mandatory retirement account that the government controls (and raids at will). Sure, if someone dies before they can receive any benefit, it may be a tax (though there are all sorts of rules on spousal benefits for widows/widowers, etc.), but it is not considered ipso facto a tax. And the Medicare/Medicaid portion is just 1.5% of gross income for employees.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
what does it mean to "pay no federal income tax"? - 18/09/2012 06:30:28 PM 963 Views
Wrong - 18/09/2012 06:37:07 PM 536 Views
Additional categories - 18/09/2012 06:51:46 PM 626 Views
SS income is very much taxed, my friend - 18/09/2012 06:59:28 PM 505 Views
Re: SS income is very much taxed, my friend - 18/09/2012 07:22:35 PM 503 Views
The wealthy get their income from investments - 18/09/2012 07:33:55 PM 574 Views
ok - 19/09/2012 05:46:49 AM 606 Views
Is that true? - 18/09/2012 06:54:33 PM 550 Views
No, it's not. See my post (you should really have read it first ) *NM* - 18/09/2012 07:00:07 PM 214 Views
No - 18/09/2012 06:56:43 PM 527 Views
Looking at that chart you linked, I have some questions. - 18/09/2012 07:05:24 PM 502 Views
Payroll taxes are for Social Security and Medicare/Medicaid - 18/09/2012 07:11:57 PM 485 Views
I think the reasoning is that since they go to entitlement programs, it's not entirely a tax. - 18/09/2012 10:55:12 PM 452 Views
While we're talking about taxes, am I the only one who doesn't give a rat's ass about Romney's? - 18/09/2012 10:37:12 PM 489 Views
That sort of thing does matter to me - 18/09/2012 10:48:30 PM 459 Views
Ah, yeah, not so much for me. - 18/09/2012 11:16:56 PM 430 Views
You gave that away with your first post - 18/09/2012 11:49:28 PM 414 Views
No way! - 19/09/2012 01:41:04 PM 454 Views
Yuh huh! - 19/09/2012 08:56:01 PM 481 Views
As an outside observer ... - 19/09/2012 01:28:13 AM 504 Views
Re: As an outside observer ... - 19/09/2012 04:45:11 AM 457 Views
the question of legality has already been covered by the offshore accounts though.... - 19/09/2012 05:44:28 AM 487 Views
Different situation then the Birther stuff - 19/09/2012 07:02:09 AM 432 Views
It's a conflict of interest. - 21/09/2012 09:52:58 PM 435 Views
I think you got it wrong: - 19/09/2012 01:52:30 AM 446 Views
+1 - you are correct, moondog screwed the pooch with this post. *NM* - 19/09/2012 05:18:19 AM 199 Views
Easier to read/understand - WSJ data on the 47% - 19/09/2012 05:25:01 AM 594 Views

Reply to Message