Active Users:465 Time:04/04/2025 10:45:00 PM
Is that true? Sareitha Sedai Send a noteboard - 18/09/2012 06:54:33 PM
as a personal example, i got a tax refund last year. therefore, i qualify for the 46-47% who "paid no income tax".


I have never heard/didn't realize that people who paid more than their federal income tax liability and therefore received a refund are included in the oft-repeated stat about "half the country" (or 47%, etc.) not paying income tax. I assumed that was referring to people who after EIC/deduction/etc. had zero or negative tax liability, therefore getting back all they paid or more than they paid, which isn't the same...at all.
If you are from Betelgeuse, please have one of your Earth friends read what I've written before you respond. Or try concentrating harder.

"The trophy problem has become extreme."
Reply to message
what does it mean to "pay no federal income tax"? - 18/09/2012 06:30:28 PM 1036 Views
Wrong - 18/09/2012 06:37:07 PM 597 Views
Additional categories - 18/09/2012 06:51:46 PM 700 Views
SS income is very much taxed, my friend - 18/09/2012 06:59:28 PM 575 Views
Re: SS income is very much taxed, my friend - 18/09/2012 07:22:35 PM 563 Views
The wealthy get their income from investments - 18/09/2012 07:33:55 PM 641 Views
ok - 19/09/2012 05:46:49 AM 672 Views
Is that true? - 18/09/2012 06:54:33 PM 614 Views
No, it's not. See my post (you should really have read it first ) *NM* - 18/09/2012 07:00:07 PM 240 Views
No - 18/09/2012 06:56:43 PM 590 Views
While we're talking about taxes, am I the only one who doesn't give a rat's ass about Romney's? - 18/09/2012 10:37:12 PM 550 Views
That sort of thing does matter to me - 18/09/2012 10:48:30 PM 527 Views
Ah, yeah, not so much for me. - 18/09/2012 11:16:56 PM 495 Views
You gave that away with your first post - 18/09/2012 11:49:28 PM 489 Views
No way! - 19/09/2012 01:41:04 PM 516 Views
Yuh huh! - 19/09/2012 08:56:01 PM 545 Views
As an outside observer ... - 19/09/2012 01:28:13 AM 569 Views
Re: As an outside observer ... - 19/09/2012 04:45:11 AM 523 Views
the question of legality has already been covered by the offshore accounts though.... - 19/09/2012 05:44:28 AM 547 Views
Different situation then the Birther stuff - 19/09/2012 07:02:09 AM 497 Views
It's a conflict of interest. - 21/09/2012 09:52:58 PM 497 Views
I think you got it wrong: - 19/09/2012 01:52:30 AM 514 Views
+1 - you are correct, moondog screwed the pooch with this post. *NM* - 19/09/2012 05:18:19 AM 226 Views
Easier to read/understand - WSJ data on the 47% - 19/09/2012 05:25:01 AM 662 Views

Reply to Message