then it sounds like you have a bigger issue.
I understand that male-female crews in a tight area can have issues, but if everyone's big boys and girls (and i mean behaviorally you dirty people), then I really do not see the issue. People aren't supposed to be having relationships and sex and shtuff on duty ANYWAYS, correct? (As in, within their military-groups, not with like...their spouses).
I understand that male-female crews in a tight area can have issues, but if everyone's big boys and girls (and i mean behaviorally you dirty people), then I really do not see the issue. People aren't supposed to be having relationships and sex and shtuff on duty ANYWAYS, correct? (As in, within their military-groups, not with like...their spouses).
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
"Military may lift ban on women in submarines" (Reuters)
28/09/2009 08:26:30 PM
- 736 Views
gives new meaning to the old joke....
28/09/2009 09:47:36 PM
- 467 Views
my favorite joke from Navy basic training (mature readers only, poorly veiled sexual reference)
28/09/2009 10:06:51 PM
- 521 Views
As I understand it, there are very good reasons why they don't let women on submarines.
28/09/2009 09:50:39 PM
- 499 Views
frankly i get along better with women who are menstruating with me.
28/09/2009 11:26:05 PM
- 463 Views
seems like a strange choice to me
28/09/2009 10:26:24 PM
- 485 Views
if you can't keep it zipped
28/09/2009 11:35:35 PM
- 474 Views
Correct and yet it happens all too frequently already.
29/09/2009 12:43:15 AM
- 450 Views
In my mind, that's a pretty pathetic arguement.
29/09/2009 01:02:31 AM
- 509 Views
WHOA!
29/09/2009 01:14:27 AM
- 433 Views
Dude I know!!
29/09/2009 01:20:27 AM
- 420 Views
Hehehe, we could "name the show".
29/09/2009 01:26:11 AM
- 415 Views
XD Or even better!!!
29/09/2009 01:40:50 AM
- 466 Views
ROFL!
29/09/2009 01:47:07 AM
- 402 Views
Your comparison to segregation is idiotic. I won't even give such a stupid claim a second thought. *NM*
29/09/2009 01:44:46 AM
- 199 Views
I love how you disregard my entire arguement based on that one factor
29/09/2009 01:48:09 AM
- 448 Views
It is an irresponsible comparison. Even in your response to my comment you can't make it work. *NM*
29/09/2009 06:39:48 PM
- 192 Views
Actually I could see her point. She was thinking along a different line than you thought she was. *NM*
29/09/2009 02:57:17 AM
- 237 Views
It's not idiotic at all.
29/09/2009 05:21:49 AM
- 447 Views
Sweden has women on subs, as do (at least) Norway, Germany, Australia and Canada *NM*
29/09/2009 07:38:43 AM
- 223 Views
Just wondering..
29/09/2009 12:42:22 PM
- 457 Views
well since all of those countries use diesel/electric subs I would no they don't stay out as long
29/09/2009 03:10:34 PM
- 432 Views
There's also the fact that none of those countries have nuclear weapons
29/09/2009 03:14:48 PM
- 460 Views
Racial prejudice has nothing to do with envy over who is fucking who. It is not a valid comparison. *NM*
29/09/2009 06:40:57 PM
- 223 Views
~Plays devils advocate~ Lets pretend...
29/09/2009 02:54:03 AM
- 542 Views
By that same token, should women also be banned from long business trips? *NM*
29/09/2009 03:23:22 AM
- 212 Views
Re: ~Plays devils advocate~ Lets pretend...
29/09/2009 03:23:31 AM
- 437 Views
It might be true in some situations, but it's a weak argument against this issue.
29/09/2009 05:15:47 AM
- 465 Views
subs are really really cramped. Ever heard the phrase hot racking?
29/09/2009 03:23:33 PM
- 542 Views
"The military is instrument of war not social engineering." Excelent point. *NM*
30/09/2009 12:34:28 AM
- 296 Views
oh please will people stop the “it worked with segregation argument”
29/09/2009 03:01:48 PM
- 430 Views
A submariner's perspective
29/09/2009 08:30:45 AM
- 473 Views
That was not Beqi but Grimbear. I was signed in but it still credited the post to her. GRRR! *NM*
29/09/2009 08:32:21 AM
- 309 Views
Interesting.
29/09/2009 09:55:11 AM
- 489 Views
a rack is just the name for a bed
29/09/2009 03:30:05 PM
- 433 Views
See, that's a good reason.
29/09/2009 01:29:32 PM
- 454 Views
before you knock the return to high school argument
29/09/2009 10:39:47 PM
- 401 Views
which i think is just silly in the terms of greater age-related legalities
30/09/2009 12:08:46 AM
- 465 Views
Re: which i think is just silly in the terms of greater age-related legalities
30/09/2009 01:12:05 AM
- 422 Views