Active Users:1198 Time:22/11/2024 04:39:25 PM
you're talking about what people who already follow these things do moondog Send a noteboard - 01/09/2012 06:40:42 AM
since these things are all so scripted to begin with, have the speakers submit their scripts to the major news outlets who will be broadcasting the conventions. these networks then run fact checkers on all the talking points in each speech and put up a small blurb with the actual truth each candidate is trying to twist to support their platform. we all already know each candidate is trying to twist and spin the facts to portray their opponents as something other than what they are, let's have their words thrown back at them in real time coverage too! :D


One of the few things that is good about the conventions is that it is for 3 or 4 days the media can't filter the whole damn thing. It is good that for occasionally we get things live and unfiltered. Wait an hour later or the next day in the newspaper for the media to call flat out lies bs.

Now I personally loathe the conventions for other reasons. Conventions are not about how the political parties are really going to govern, this is just in a window into their souls and shows how they would act without reality kicking in. It is pure Id. Sure it is pure BS but it shows the best and worse of the parties.


what i'm saying is that more people would probably be interested to see whether or not a candidate's talking points are actually valid. and it would have the added benefit of keeping the speakers from distorting too far since they know their words will be scrutinized in real time. the people who tune out because of the lying would have a greater incentive to pay attention, the people who already pay attention are already checking the papers and other sources the next day.
"The RIAA has shown a certain disregard for the creative people of the industry in their eagerness to protect the revenues of the record companies." -- Frank Zappa

"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
Reply to message
how to make political convention speeches more entertaining - 31/08/2012 03:57:11 PM 586 Views
If they did that, I would actually watch. - 31/08/2012 04:18:06 PM 824 Views
Ditto - 31/08/2012 04:42:37 PM 471 Views
Ha, like Pop-Up Video! - 31/08/2012 05:04:41 PM 432 Views
That similarity occured to me, too. *NM* - 31/08/2012 09:37:22 PM 223 Views
and how fact checks the fact checkers? *NM* - 31/08/2012 05:19:45 PM 200 Views
Fox, presumably. - 31/08/2012 06:05:56 PM 673 Views
the fact checkers tend be journalist and deserve all the trust that goes with that *NM* - 01/09/2012 10:36:18 AM 224 Views
Facts are facts, and not in the eye of the beholder. - 01/09/2012 12:08:41 PM 426 Views
That might be true if fat checkers limited themsleves to facts and not opinion - 01/09/2012 02:44:41 PM 503 Views
Stating opinions as fact invites checking them as facts. - 01/09/2012 02:59:23 PM 637 Views
I will let Scott Wlaker explain it to you - 01/09/2012 05:56:00 PM 616 Views
Even Walker admits "It’s closed — has been as long as Obama has been president." - 01/09/2012 06:27:32 PM 603 Views
well since Ryan never claimed Obama caused the plant to close it doesn't matter when it closed - 01/09/2012 08:10:26 PM 436 Views
How could he save a plant already closed? - 01/09/2012 08:31:55 PM 420 Views
It's obvious. - 01/09/2012 10:12:33 PM 487 Views
Of course; how could I have been so blind. - 01/09/2012 10:41:03 PM 396 Views
That is a great idea that will never happen. - 31/08/2012 06:08:30 PM 583 Views
I loathe the conventions, but this will make it worse - 01/09/2012 03:52:15 AM 465 Views
you're talking about what people who already follow these things do - 01/09/2012 06:40:42 AM 411 Views
We fundamentally disagree - 01/09/2012 01:54:26 PM 605 Views

Reply to Message