Active Users:361 Time:21/04/2025 10:13:38 AM
It does get repetitive too often. Joel Send a noteboard - 31/08/2012 05:07:41 AM
I respect that criticism, but implications long=bad prompt rants on people wanting complexity and nuance dumbed down to soundbites. Coming from people smart enough to know better it is especially annoying. If a post demands too much time someone wants to invest elsewhere, fine, but taking that time out from Tolstoy or Gibbon to say a few hundred characters is just inherently too long to read is ridiculous.


Maybe it's fairer to say that it's too long to read for what they feel they'd get out of it. I think that's an important distinction. There are some people who are what you're complaining about, no doubt about it, but there are also people who feel that the opinion of a relatively random person on the Internet is only worth so much of their time and effort. Doubly so when it comes to a point-by-point debate of that opinion.

It is also fair to say that reading text on a monitor is harder on the eyes than reading text on a page, though how much that contributes to the Internet's relative brevity I can't guess.

TL;DR summary: shit be exhausting, yo.

I was with you till the last part, but "exhausting" is just not applicable to a few hundred words confronting someone who regularly reads a few hundred pages per day. If, to borrow one of Jordans favorite phrases, someone feels the candle not worth the wick, that is reasonable. It is the suggestion thick tomes are well within their capacity but my posts too verbose for them to process that bothers me, particularly when they know the issue is too complex for an *NM* to adequately address.

I think we're looking at not how large of a "tome," but how many times one is willing to read the same page. And/or how much effort to spend deciphering oddball tangents, metaphors, etc.

When people gloss over or flat out ignore things though I feel like they either missed them in the text wall or are trying to obscure them from others, so I end up reiterating them to make sure EVERYONE noticed. I do try to minimize tangents, but it is a holistic world and so many things are interconnected it is not always easy (e.g. Romney invoking Neil Armstrong tonight leads straight into my lengthy "Reaganomics is the reason we have done NOTHING but regress since the moon landing" rant, even though it began with the Energy Crises and Nixon ending the gold standard.) The metaphors, well, I try really hard to find apt ones, and sometimes the best parallels come from unconventional places.

I do take your point though; the preceding was more explanation than excuse. I guess it is a bit late for me to avoid threadjacking (sorry. :<img class=' />)
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
This message last edited by Joel on 31/08/2012 at 05:10:14 AM
Reply to message
Anybody here ever studied the founding fathers of America? - 30/08/2012 07:34:28 PM 821 Views
Slave-owning, mysoginist, wig-wearing members of the landed elite? - 30/08/2012 07:51:33 PM 562 Views
Ha! Yeah, all personal faults aside - 30/08/2012 07:54:13 PM 501 Views
Not John Adams or Alexander Hamilton.....fool! *NM* - 31/08/2012 05:18:05 AM 297 Views
No, never, not even briefly. - 30/08/2012 07:57:39 PM 577 Views
What? Nooooo way - 30/08/2012 08:06:30 PM 578 Views
You're projecting. *NM* - 31/08/2012 12:48:12 AM 262 Views
I am aspiring. - 31/08/2012 01:09:40 AM 703 Views
As a personal aside ... - 31/08/2012 01:43:45 AM 633 Views
Yes. - 31/08/2012 01:49:41 AM 647 Views
Like I say, maybe I invest too much in online posting. - 31/08/2012 02:02:58 AM 676 Views
Re: - 31/08/2012 02:27:00 AM 658 Views
Re: Re: - 31/08/2012 02:37:35 AM 660 Views
Well - 31/08/2012 02:54:25 AM 664 Views
It does get repetitive too often. - 31/08/2012 05:07:41 AM 667 Views
Doesn't really matter. You're gonna keep doing it. - 31/08/2012 05:16:23 AM 619 Views
Maybe.... - 31/08/2012 05:03:11 PM 659 Views
Re: Maybe.... - 31/08/2012 05:15:52 PM 476 Views
Re: Maybe.... - 31/08/2012 06:18:32 PM 618 Views
You aren't Plato, Burke, or Madison. - 31/08/2012 10:34:22 AM 577 Views
That is why it is aspiration rather than equivalence. - 31/08/2012 05:01:20 PM 542 Views
I'm not so sure you're entirely right. - 30/08/2012 11:06:39 PM 703 Views
I did. They smelled of mahogany and death. They looked scabby and skeletal. - 31/08/2012 12:35:44 AM 603 Views
Sounds like you have a job to do. - 31/08/2012 01:11:10 AM 601 Views
Don't forget Hamilton! The creator of the American economy..... *NM* - 31/08/2012 05:19:50 AM 308 Views
... and big government. - 01/09/2012 01:54:20 PM 493 Views
I don't really buy that..... - 01/09/2012 08:33:28 PM 543 Views
I think the entire Age of Enlightenment is fascinating - 31/08/2012 06:32:23 PM 525 Views
You realize you just made a great argument for intelligentsia rule, right? - 01/09/2012 01:48:58 PM 613 Views
I would want better intelligenstia first - 01/09/2012 02:48:28 PM 684 Views
Ah, the old uneducated>miseducated argument. - 01/09/2012 03:39:07 PM 633 Views
*wonders if we could test* - 02/09/2012 02:45:10 PM 508 Views
no there is a better reason why it wouldn't work - 02/09/2012 02:58:18 PM 651 Views
No,no, I was wondering if -we- could test it. - 03/09/2012 04:17:11 PM 553 Views
yeah I am a bit of a cynic *NM* - 04/09/2012 03:01:28 PM 270 Views
I expect the rankings would be too subjective for credibility. - 02/09/2012 04:27:32 PM 637 Views

Reply to Message