Active Users:531 Time:05/04/2025 07:31:50 PM
One can't say "regarding" unless one has referred to something first. Tom Send a noteboard - 30/08/2012 09:00:16 PM
It's not proper for someone to say, "Regarding the conventions..." as a means of introducing the conventions. If someone said, "What do you think about the conventions?" then it would be possible to respond with "regarding."

It's as silly as starting every sentence that isn't a question with "because".
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
I encourage anyone planning on voting in the US elections this November to watch both conventions. - 27/08/2012 11:38:31 PM 977 Views
Re: I encourage anyone planning on voting in the US elections this November to watch no conventions. - 27/08/2012 11:43:07 PM 771 Views
You're not properly using a "Re:" tag if you are changing the subject line. *NM* - 28/08/2012 12:42:13 AM 265 Views
It is convenient though, and concise. - 28/08/2012 02:10:52 AM 715 Views
I had to do it to fit the 100 character limit *NM* - 28/08/2012 03:58:32 AM 323 Views
Unless you're Roh. *NM* - 28/08/2012 09:56:01 PM 304 Views
I'm not sure why the rules of the English language wouldn't apply to her in particular. *NM* - 29/08/2012 02:05:39 AM 306 Views
Because I miss her posts, I guess. - 29/08/2012 09:20:23 PM 570 Views
One can't say "regarding" unless one has referred to something first. - 30/08/2012 09:00:16 PM 530 Views
God already decided the GOP convention should be cut short. No arguing with deities. *NM* - 28/08/2012 12:03:30 AM 358 Views
Would you still say that if Obama were struck by lightning? *NM* - 28/08/2012 12:42:40 AM 232 Views
Assuming he survived, I'd probably make the same joke, yes. - 28/08/2012 01:28:44 AM 571 Views
No, no, they "prayed away the spray." - 28/08/2012 02:09:02 AM 578 Views
I sometimes watch bits and pieces - 28/08/2012 01:03:04 AM 610 Views
Ive decided to vote for Satan. - 28/08/2012 02:42:09 AM 628 Views
Glad to see you joining the Republican fold! *NM* - 28/08/2012 01:23:55 PM 283 Views
Cheney isn't running this year *NM* - 29/08/2012 06:40:44 AM 329 Views
*NM* - 30/08/2012 09:48:47 PM 311 Views
Well, yeah; most of us are, but which one...? - 29/08/2012 11:24:09 PM 604 Views
What else do we need to know? Obama was a disaster for 4 years, everything got worse..... - 28/08/2012 04:57:21 AM 598 Views
You are right. The Green Party is clearly the sensible choice. *NM* - 28/08/2012 08:10:26 PM 316 Views
Who??? *NM* - 29/08/2012 05:02:27 AM 325 Views
I may have been joking when I said that. *NM* - 29/08/2012 10:47:27 AM 359 Views
*NM* - 30/08/2012 05:43:10 AM 333 Views
The incumbent administration being deemed a 4-year disaster didn't help Kerry defeat Bush. *NM* - 28/08/2012 09:28:03 PM 327 Views
But that was all in foreign policy. The economy was doing pretty well back then. - 29/08/2012 02:04:13 AM 602 Views
+1 - the ecomony in 2004 was kicking butt and lead to GWB's reelection, *NM* - 29/08/2012 05:05:12 AM 327 Views
Only by comparison to the rest of Bushs presidency. - 29/08/2012 09:53:20 AM 660 Views
You're actually blaming Bush for 9/11 now? - 30/08/2012 04:22:05 AM 578 Views
It is the Richard Clarke criticism. - 30/08/2012 01:08:39 PM 643 Views
He also blames Bush for a Clinton dot-com bubble bursting. - 30/08/2012 09:04:38 PM 542 Views
Question: - 30/08/2012 11:04:35 PM 708 Views
I think you're trying to get me to vote "neither." - 28/08/2012 03:08:07 PM 658 Views
"None of the Above!" ~ Monty Brewster *NM* - 28/08/2012 09:28:33 PM 327 Views
Ideally, I'm trying to just get as many people as possible to not vote Obama. - 29/08/2012 02:04:57 AM 516 Views
Conventions won't do that. - 29/08/2012 07:56:22 PM 561 Views
See, you're not taking it far enough. - 03/09/2012 04:03:40 AM 620 Views
I am confused about so many things concerning this election. - 03/09/2012 03:53:35 AM 575 Views

Reply to Message