My US history class was an hour long and I always got distracted by a butterfly or something.
Joel Send a noteboard - 30/08/2012 08:50:39 PM
By "something" I of course mean "a cheerleader in a short skirt." 
' /> Really, expecting kids to pay attention and learn vital information when bursting with hormones and surrounded by members of the opposite sex is probably a fools errand. 
People writing like that today would find their Wall of Text met by a Wall of TL;DR. Any sentence with more than two clauses is simply too complex for Short Attention Span Theater, as is any document with more than two paragraphs.
Sadly, you are 100% correct about that.
If only I knew what to do about it....
That is ONE SENTENCE, not even an especially long one, by constitutional standards. Look at section 2 of the Fourteenth Amendment, almost a century later:
What a great sentence, no?
Indeed.
People no longer write like that because few can be bothered to read and comprehend it. Ending government by sound bite is as simple as demanding better instead of demanding simplicity. Heaven knows we should; the Constitutions text well demonstrates most government policy is too complex to fully address in five words.
Reading comprehension is a failing of modern teaching. And that damn Twitter!
I ain't sayin' nothin'; I'm jus' sayin' when teachers spanked we didn't need no Adderall. Honestly, I think remote controls are much of it. The bottom line may simply be we have encouraged instant gratification so much and so long many people are intellectually lazy because they lack incentive to concentrate, think it an imposition.
' /> Really, expecting kids to pay attention and learn vital information when bursting with hormones and surrounded by members of the opposite sex is probably a fools errand. The founding of America is simply my favorite time in history. I'm simply in awe of the men like Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, James Madison, and, heck, even Thomas Paine. Their personal writings are mesmerizing. Nobody writes like that anymore. You could quote just about anything they wrote and apply it to an arguement about politics and blow people away. Their intellect is unmatched nowadays, sadly. Seriously, is there anybody out there right now writing such deep, meaningful things about life and liberty?
These people wrote a document that founded a country and is still, after 200+ years, almost unassailable. How incredibly amazing is that? And also sad, that we haven't managed to improve upon the foundation that was established so many years ago. This country is simply not what it was or how it was suppose to be. Still, for all the cracks in that foundation, it's still something special.
How I wish there was a founding father-type person running for election. What a world that would be.
These people wrote a document that founded a country and is still, after 200+ years, almost unassailable. How incredibly amazing is that? And also sad, that we haven't managed to improve upon the foundation that was established so many years ago. This country is simply not what it was or how it was suppose to be. Still, for all the cracks in that foundation, it's still something special.
How I wish there was a founding father-type person running for election. What a world that would be.
People writing like that today would find their Wall of Text met by a Wall of TL;DR. Any sentence with more than two clauses is simply too complex for Short Attention Span Theater, as is any document with more than two paragraphs.
Sadly, you are 100% correct about that.
If only I knew what to do about it....
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
That is ONE SENTENCE, not even an especially long one, by constitutional standards. Look at section 2 of the Fourteenth Amendment, almost a century later:
What a great sentence, no?
Indeed.
Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.
People no longer write like that because few can be bothered to read and comprehend it. Ending government by sound bite is as simple as demanding better instead of demanding simplicity. Heaven knows we should; the Constitutions text well demonstrates most government policy is too complex to fully address in five words.
Reading comprehension is a failing of modern teaching. And that damn Twitter!
I ain't sayin' nothin'; I'm jus' sayin' when teachers spanked we didn't need no Adderall.
Honestly, I think remote controls are much of it. The bottom line may simply be we have encouraged instant gratification so much and so long many people are intellectually lazy because they lack incentive to concentrate, think it an imposition.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
This message last edited by Joel on 30/08/2012 at 08:52:36 PM
Anybody here ever studied the founding fathers of America?
- 30/08/2012 07:34:28 PM
751 Views
Slave-owning, mysoginist, wig-wearing members of the landed elite?
- 30/08/2012 07:51:33 PM
502 Views
No, never, not even briefly.
- 30/08/2012 07:57:39 PM
508 Views
- 30/08/2012 07:57:39 PM
508 Views
What? Nooooo way
- 30/08/2012 08:06:30 PM
508 Views
- 30/08/2012 08:06:30 PM
508 Views
My US history class was an hour long and I always got distracted by a butterfly or something.
- 30/08/2012 08:50:39 PM
459 Views
Did you just kinda compare yourself to the founding fathers?
- 30/08/2012 08:08:40 PM
519 Views
- 30/08/2012 08:08:40 PM
519 Views
Not positively, but I have often thought they were a bad influence on me. 
- 30/08/2012 08:21:48 PM
540 Views
- 30/08/2012 08:21:48 PM
540 Views
Funny, my reaction to sentences like those is nearly the opposite.
- 30/08/2012 08:11:34 PM
489 Views
Fair point; it is revealing that none of the Bill of Rights amendments have multiple sections.
- 30/08/2012 08:39:24 PM
523 Views
You're projecting. *NM*
- 31/08/2012 12:48:12 AM
235 Views
I am aspiring.
- 31/08/2012 01:09:40 AM
645 Views
As a personal aside ...
- 31/08/2012 01:43:45 AM
565 Views
Like I say, maybe I invest too much in online posting.
- 31/08/2012 02:02:58 AM
619 Views
- 31/08/2012 02:02:58 AM
619 Views
Re:
- 31/08/2012 02:27:00 AM
594 Views
Re: Re:
- 31/08/2012 02:37:35 AM
598 Views
Well
- 31/08/2012 02:54:25 AM
598 Views
It does get repetitive too often.
- 31/08/2012 05:07:41 AM
601 Views
Doesn't really matter. You're gonna keep doing it. 
- 31/08/2012 05:16:23 AM
554 Views
- 31/08/2012 05:16:23 AM
554 Views
I did. They smelled of mahogany and death. They looked scabby and skeletal.
- 31/08/2012 12:35:44 AM
537 Views
Don't forget Hamilton! The creator of the American economy..... *NM*
- 31/08/2012 05:19:50 AM
283 Views
... and big government.
- 01/09/2012 01:54:20 PM
429 Views
I don't really buy that.....
- 01/09/2012 08:33:28 PM
485 Views
Hamilton loudly and often advocated a central bank, national debt and active federal government.
- 01/09/2012 08:41:50 PM
669 Views
I think the entire Age of Enlightenment is fascinating
- 31/08/2012 06:32:23 PM
464 Views
You realize you just made a great argument for intelligentsia rule, right?
- 01/09/2012 01:48:58 PM
556 Views
- 01/09/2012 01:48:58 PM
556 Views
I would want better intelligenstia first
- 01/09/2012 02:48:28 PM
611 Views
Ah, the old uneducated>miseducated argument.
- 01/09/2012 03:39:07 PM
571 Views
*wonders if we could test*
- 02/09/2012 02:45:10 PM
440 Views
no there is a better reason why it wouldn't work
- 02/09/2012 02:58:18 PM
591 Views
I listen to some of supposed intellectuals talk and I am unimpressed
- 02/09/2012 02:53:21 PM
482 Views
Being well read does not make one smart, but does facilitate it to a great degree.
- 02/09/2012 04:32:05 PM
433 Views
I like the Starship Trooper approach
- 02/09/2012 05:04:17 PM
548 Views
I run very hot and cold on that one.
- 02/09/2012 06:28:44 PM
639 Views
What was that again about "you have a right to your own opinion, not your own facts"?
- 03/09/2012 06:39:01 PM
592 Views
Ah, right; I had forgotten our previous discussion of conscriptions termination in the '90s and '00s
- 03/09/2012 06:48:28 PM
527 Views
If you worked with more engineers you might change your opinion on the science degree part
- 04/09/2012 03:00:16 PM
481 Views
Maybe; I would likely just conclude horse sense is uncommon everywhere, but less so in engineers.
- 05/09/2012 12:11:58 AM
404 Views