Also, I'm sure you're aware, but the argument has been made often enough that the "Re:" is an abbreviation not of "reply" but of "regarding", and as such is perfectly fine to be used that way.
I encourage anyone planning on voting in the US elections this November to watch both conventions.
- 27/08/2012 11:38:31 PM
900 Views
Re: I encourage anyone planning on voting in the US elections this November to watch no conventions.
- 27/08/2012 11:43:07 PM
689 Views
You're not properly using a "Re:" tag if you are changing the subject line. *NM*
- 28/08/2012 12:42:13 AM
232 Views
*NM*
Unless you're Roh. *NM*
- 28/08/2012 09:56:01 PM
277 Views
I'm not sure why the rules of the English language wouldn't apply to her in particular. *NM*
- 29/08/2012 02:05:39 AM
272 Views
Because I miss her posts, I guess. 
- 29/08/2012 09:20:23 PM
493 Views
- 29/08/2012 09:20:23 PM
493 Views
One can't say "regarding" unless one has referred to something first.
- 30/08/2012 09:00:16 PM
454 Views
God already decided the GOP convention should be cut short. No arguing with deities. *NM*
- 28/08/2012 12:03:30 AM
333 Views
I may need to see if there is an online stream.
- 28/08/2012 12:34:07 AM
582 Views
The party platform is generally stated, though.
- 28/08/2012 12:44:04 AM
471 Views
Yes, but past conventions also decided it; now it is just reiterated and marketed (or downplayed.)
- 28/08/2012 01:54:08 AM
571 Views
Ive decided to vote for Satan.
- 28/08/2012 02:42:09 AM
545 Views
*NM*
*NM*
What else do we need to know? Obama was a disaster for 4 years, everything got worse.....
- 28/08/2012 04:57:21 AM
518 Views
You are right. The Green Party is clearly the sensible choice. *NM*
- 28/08/2012 08:10:26 PM
285 Views
Who??? *NM*
- 29/08/2012 05:02:27 AM
301 Views
The incumbent administration being deemed a 4-year disaster didn't help Kerry defeat Bush. *NM*
- 28/08/2012 09:28:03 PM
301 Views
But that was all in foreign policy. The economy was doing pretty well back then.
- 29/08/2012 02:04:13 AM
556 Views
+1 - the ecomony in 2004 was kicking butt and lead to GWB's reelection, *NM*
- 29/08/2012 05:05:12 AM
298 Views
Only by comparison to the rest of Bushs presidency.
- 29/08/2012 09:53:20 AM
587 Views
You're actually blaming Bush for 9/11 now?
- 30/08/2012 04:22:05 AM
498 Views
He also blames Bush for a Clinton dot-com bubble bursting.
- 30/08/2012 09:04:38 PM
462 Views
Question:
- 30/08/2012 11:04:35 PM
626 Views
You are so delusional it is a waste of time to discuss the matter further.
- 30/08/2012 11:12:42 PM
461 Views
Those sophisticated pets.com investors were driving the Dow at some point?
- 30/08/2012 11:32:11 PM
577 Views
Re: What else do we need to know? Obama was a disaster for 4 years, everything got worse.....
- 03/09/2012 03:57:00 AM
482 Views
I think you're trying to get me to vote "neither."
- 28/08/2012 03:08:07 PM
574 Views
Ideally, I'm trying to just get as many people as possible to not vote Obama.
- 29/08/2012 02:04:57 AM
426 Views
Fox News (!) on Ryan's speech last night.
- 30/08/2012 09:09:43 AM
538 Views
Fox News or a token liberal at Fox News?
- 30/08/2012 09:23:22 AM
666 Views
While I expect it's the latter, I can't help but hope the media will call the RNC out on their lies.
- 30/08/2012 11:00:20 AM
539 Views
They are doing so, but it does not matter.
- 30/08/2012 03:26:47 PM
722 Views
Part of the problem is that trust in media is an all time low and the earned that
- 30/08/2012 04:49:23 PM
570 Views
Much of it is Reagans old PR man creating Fox News to falsely convince people media is untrustworthy
- 30/08/2012 07:35:19 PM
625 Views
Lies is a strong word. If the RNC lies, Obama is postively burning through his pants wardrobe.
- 30/08/2012 10:04:39 PM
503 Views