Active Users:1117 Time:22/11/2024 07:02:24 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
And he does have a very large head. This could get dangerous. nossy Send a noteboard - 25/08/2012 09:14:27 PM
I'm guessing he is shooting for "pointedly antagonistic post."

Only fair. Always opinions on both sides - I just wish we could all manage to be adults in the discussion. :P
Reply to message
Lance Armstrong - Victim of Witch Hunt of Epic Proportions Anonymous2000 - 25/08/2012 04:22:24 PM 983 Views
Miguel Indurain - supports Lance Anonymous2000 - 25/08/2012 04:54:28 PM 936 Views
You realize you're going to make Snoop's head explode, right? *NM* ßelals Girl - 25/08/2012 08:29:16 PM 465 Views
And he does have a very large head. This could get dangerous. nossy - 25/08/2012 09:14:27 PM 639 Views
HA! HA! Lance Armstrong must have kicked his dog or something. Anonymous2000 - 25/08/2012 10:20:31 PM 621 Views
You assume I think his trolling has any credibility, it seems. *NM* snoopcester - 26/08/2012 05:14:45 PM 311 Views
Lighten up a hair, would you? ßelals Girl - 26/08/2012 05:44:28 PM 631 Views
I'm just sayinghe is well known for trolling snoopcester - 26/08/2012 05:46:33 PM 657 Views
Snoop = coward.....he turns tail and runs Anonymous2000 - 26/08/2012 05:50:43 PM 631 Views
Oh dear Anonymous2000 would you be so kind as to show a thread of maturity? *NM* Stephen - 26/08/2012 06:43:11 PM 305 Views
You're like a fourteen-year-old flailing at the keys. Nate - 26/08/2012 07:20:25 PM 612 Views
And testicular cancer, a known side effect of steroid abuse. Joel - 26/08/2012 02:44:18 AM 879 Views
Wow. Using his cancer as evidence against him. You've sunk to a new low. *NM* Ghavrel - 26/08/2012 12:02:32 PM 316 Views
+1 - D-bag comment from Joel. *NM* Anonymous2000 - 26/08/2012 05:48:50 PM 292 Views
Meh. You have not responded to my POSTS, rather than their author, for several years. Joel - 26/08/2012 10:44:52 PM 636 Views
I just did. Using someone's life-threatening illness in an attempt to discredit them is disgusting. Ghavrel - 27/08/2012 04:41:52 AM 599 Views
Using an illness doping commonly causes as evidence of doping is reasonable. Joel - 27/08/2012 04:57:01 AM 689 Views
What is your source that it 'commonly causes' it? Isaac - 27/08/2012 06:15:39 AM 771 Views
You are right, I should not have said, "causes," but "is associated with." Joel - 27/08/2012 07:38:36 AM 852 Views
So, you screwed the pooch and have been proven wrong. Time for you to apologize. *NM* Anonymous2000 - 28/08/2012 05:00:51 AM 299 Views
Fine: I am sorry I did not say, "And testicular cancer, known to be associated with steroid abuse." Joel - 28/08/2012 06:20:03 AM 932 Views
It's also a side-effect of cycling Sidious - 26/08/2012 04:46:25 PM 997 Views
Fair point. Joel - 26/08/2012 10:41:21 PM 685 Views
shut up Joel, just shut up *NM* Yunalesca - 26/08/2012 05:42:52 PM 314 Views
No? Joel - 26/08/2012 10:52:06 PM 698 Views
Stir it up, stir it up... *NM* everynametaken - 26/08/2012 09:11:55 AM 388 Views
I actually agree with you. Great Lord of Chaos - 27/08/2012 06:36:55 AM 772 Views
They have no evidence whatsoever. Most folks agree with us, as per numerous..... Anonymous2000 - 28/08/2012 05:04:37 AM 608 Views
Not to rain on your parade or anything, as I'm not entirely convinced either, but... Legolas - 28/08/2012 10:07:56 PM 627 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes