Active Users:428 Time:16/11/2024 02:55:41 AM
Well, okay, fair point. Legolas Send a noteboard - 31/07/2012 08:58:04 PM
I suspect it is more a sign of the ignorance of most British sports journalists about cycling.

Also very possible, yes. Speaking of which, Chris Boardman and his co-commentator during that women's race were really painful to listen to at times. Kept repeating the same things over and over and tried to convince people that having a 30 second lead with 30 km to go was somehow a convincing lead that the peloton would never pull back... it did turn out that way, of course, but far larger gaps have been closed over that distance. Even if the small teams did to some extent give an advantage to breakaways.
I guess you've probably seen less interviews with Cavendish after not winning than we see over here - he does hit some serious lows, I doubt there are many sportsmen out there who take so much onto themselves and so obviously feel like they've let people down when they don't win.

I've noticed that before, that he's always talking about his team in all the interviews (which, indeed, I generally only get to see after he's won). Which is only fair, considering that he's not the type of sprinter, like Freire or Zabel in his day, who can win races even without any support. But still, a lot of people in his place would be more arrogant about it, for sure.

He was so much the favourite that it was always going to be really hard... favourites always have a hard time in World or Olympic championships, particularly if they have to do it in the sprint. There's just so much pressure and you need so much luck, either in getting away with the right escape or in having the escape reeled in in time without anyone launching a new one.
It is a real shame he didn't retire when he first said he was going to, cycling really doesn't need people like him hanging around the sport... but I'd not be surprised to see him stay involved with Astana even once he does retire from rider.

I think we can be quite certain of that, yes. Just what cycling needs... not.
Reply to message
What's everyone looking forward to in the Olympics? - 28/07/2012 01:50:18 PM 640 Views
The athletics. - 28/07/2012 05:44:05 PM 440 Views
I believe you. *NM* - 28/07/2012 06:54:07 PM 286 Views
Athletics and women's football *NM* - 28/07/2012 07:18:48 PM 215 Views
Medal count at the conclusion. Mostly the conlusion. *NM* - 28/07/2012 08:04:22 PM 217 Views
Them ending, to be honest - 28/07/2012 10:16:24 PM 437 Views
Same here. I don't care at all about the Olympics. - 30/07/2012 06:35:39 PM 470 Views
Well now. This is horrible. - 30/07/2012 08:16:30 PM 389 Views
Maaaaannnn. - 30/07/2012 08:20:45 PM 452 Views
Ditto - 01/08/2012 05:34:11 AM 516 Views
Well, other than watching Chinese sportspeople smash WRs for fun... - 28/07/2012 11:04:53 PM 435 Views
Yeah - 28/07/2012 11:46:20 PM 490 Views
The big fuss over here doesn't seem to have made much of an impact in the UK? - 30/07/2012 11:23:47 PM 445 Views
No, I don't think any of the mainstream media has picked up on it - 30/07/2012 11:59:27 PM 384 Views
I suppose they don't want to rain on the parade. - 31/07/2012 06:35:49 PM 467 Views
Indeed, the British press would never want to do that - 31/07/2012 07:59:04 PM 586 Views
Well, okay, fair point. - 31/07/2012 08:58:04 PM 499 Views
Re: Well, okay, fair point. - 31/07/2012 10:09:30 PM 557 Views
Also, in one of the lowest points of journalism in olympic history - 31/07/2012 12:06:37 AM 409 Views
I... don't even know how to read that. - 31/07/2012 06:26:56 PM 660 Views
I'm not completely sure either - 31/07/2012 08:02:46 PM 416 Views
Her - 29/07/2012 01:56:39 PM 616 Views
She's not competing as far as I know. - 29/07/2012 02:43:16 PM 500 Views
*NM* - 29/07/2012 02:59:42 PM 195 Views
yeah that was impressive *NM* - 30/07/2012 10:13:07 PM 184 Views
*cat calls* - 31/07/2012 05:20:30 PM 403 Views
Re: *cat calls* - 01/08/2012 12:00:40 AM 385 Views
I like the track and field and the swimming *NM* - 30/07/2012 10:13:36 PM 190 Views
Equestrian sports - 31/07/2012 12:13:33 AM 391 Views

Reply to Message