Active Users:1188 Time:22/11/2024 01:30:05 PM
It's more been a critique on his ability to be a statesman Wibble Send a noteboard - 27/07/2012 06:42:35 PM
...which so far he has failed miserably.

I daresay 90%+ of British people probably have no clue who he is or why he is here, or care for that matter.

However, this is his first foriegn trip as the Reps candidate, his first stop on that trip is in the city which the whole world is currently focused on, and almost the first words out of his mouth are "It's hard to know just how well it will turn out.There are a few things that were disconcerting." It's just downright rude and unstatesmanlike.

If he was here as a past organiser of an olympics offering advice, then fine, but he's not, he's here trying to show his credentials as a statesman. And part of that means you dont walk into someone elses party and go "who chose chocolate cake, i prefer victoria sponge, oh and those cups arent stacked right". Instead you walk in and say, it's gonna be a great party, or you say nothing.

The only thing the press can talk about just now is the olympics, that is to be expected. If a dog jumps through some hoops - olympics! - a granny baked a flame cake - front page! - the US Republicans Presedential Candidate commenting on someone elses party - Go to town.

An experienced international statesman would have known this, a man finding his feet as the nominee whos claim to fame is making money and orgainsing olympics, unfortunately didn't, and his team were too busy putting out their own fire to tell him. They've said all the right things since, but the horse had bolted.
Reply to message
Are the British really that thin skinned? - 27/07/2012 03:25:44 PM 854 Views
I still haven't figured out how it was offensive but it apparently was *NM* - 27/07/2012 04:43:23 PM 225 Views
One of these days I will learn how to repsond to a post *NM* - 27/07/2012 05:29:56 PM 242 Views
The great irony is... - 28/07/2012 04:26:08 AM 489 Views
Especially compared to the slights from Obama - 27/07/2012 04:50:11 PM 485 Views
I think you have to be careful, because you can't see it the way they do. - 27/07/2012 05:23:22 PM 547 Views
That is why I possed it as a question - 27/07/2012 06:12:43 PM 501 Views
Yeah sure, we never get upset by stuff like this. - 27/07/2012 06:47:59 PM 563 Views
I my defense - 27/07/2012 07:44:18 PM 631 Views
I'm not attacking, so you probably don't need defense. - 27/07/2012 08:14:33 PM 627 Views
Let me tell you a story. - 27/07/2012 08:44:16 PM 684 Views
It's more likely the press making a big deal out of nothing. - 27/07/2012 05:35:20 PM 500 Views
I agree with this too - 27/07/2012 05:38:15 PM 439 Views
The middle of nowhere comment was pretty good *NM* - 27/07/2012 06:13:27 PM 217 Views
That was what it seemed like to me. The "Mr. Leader" thing was sort of funny, though. - 27/07/2012 08:16:11 PM 531 Views
Yeah - 28/07/2012 10:02:25 AM 530 Views
It's more been a critique on his ability to be a statesman - 27/07/2012 06:42:35 PM 506 Views
I agree he practiced poor statesmanship - 27/07/2012 07:52:17 PM 513 Views
Is anything ever as bad as the morning cable guys make it out to be? *NM* - 27/07/2012 08:48:32 PM 240 Views
The way they were going you would think he had goosed the queen *NM* - 27/07/2012 09:40:59 PM 224 Views
~shrug~ - 27/07/2012 08:29:42 PM 687 Views
It was unmannerly and unstatesman-like. - 28/07/2012 01:09:36 AM 495 Views
I think some were at worst fleetingly annoyed - 28/07/2012 08:12:29 AM 627 Views
Couldn't give a toodle-flip, mate. - 01/08/2012 02:37:14 PM 595 Views
well good luck with that *NM* - 01/08/2012 02:39:26 PM 228 Views

Reply to Message