Active Users:1110 Time:23/11/2024 02:03:05 AM
Re: Nate Send a noteboard - 23/04/2012 02:19:07 PM
Dr No (I was sure the first book was Casino Royale but Dr No was the first film)


I thought Isaac must know about some film version of Casino Royale that was done before Dr. No. But I just looked it up, and the only film versions of Casino Royale are the 2003 version and a 1967 Bond spoof (Dr. No was 1962). A television episode based on Casino Royale was done in 1954 ... but the question said it was a movie.

However, I just realized that the question is probably just not worded the way we're reading it. We're reading it as "original book and original movie", when it's saying "original book and any movie". So that's what threw us off.
Warder to starry_nite

Chapterfish — Nate's Writing Blog
http://chapterfish.wordpress.com
Reply to message
Test Your Geekdom, Vol IX: You Bet Your Life - 22/04/2012 09:39:44 PM 877 Views
The Answers - 22/04/2012 09:56:35 PM 440 Views
*Duplicate* *NM* - 22/04/2012 09:56:35 PM 204 Views
I'm claiming 13 points, although one of them is a different answer than yours. - 22/04/2012 10:58:45 PM 422 Views
I'd acknowledge that alternative as valid - 22/04/2012 11:16:57 PM 424 Views
17 for me. - 22/04/2012 11:15:42 PM 426 Views
We do not HAVE a "ch" sound. - 22/05/2012 11:29:03 PM 432 Views
I got 18. - 23/04/2012 04:20:53 AM 498 Views
There were actually TWO "Casino Royale" movies. - 22/05/2012 11:46:03 PM 558 Views
Let's see: 15 1/2 - 23/04/2012 01:26:51 PM 511 Views
Re: - 23/04/2012 02:19:07 PM 452 Views
It's very bad wording on my part, cleaned it up *NM* - 23/04/2012 03:15:57 PM 195 Views
Umm you sure about #3? - 23/04/2012 03:36:52 PM 512 Views
Actually no, I must be off my game, that's two ambigous/wrong bits in the quiz - 23/04/2012 03:45:56 PM 421 Views
Huh. - 23/04/2012 03:57:32 PM 413 Views
Yeah it would have been cooler, mental-edit probably - 23/04/2012 04:20:26 PM 446 Views
I think RJ had it ripped off to call the readers' attention to it *NM* - 23/04/2012 09:25:29 PM 252 Views
11, that's half - 23/04/2012 09:05:56 PM 455 Views
17, better than I expected, actually. - 22/05/2012 11:04:07 PM 548 Views

Reply to Message