Jackie Robinson wasn't all that long ago, and it wasn't until afterwards that black participation in MLB became the norm, rather than an oddity.
Now imagine that you are one of the pioneers who fought for your right to participate in baseball... and then the younger generation simply doesn't want to play it, anymore. It'd piss you off. It'd be like if, shortly after Rosa Parks refused to give up her seat on the bus, African Americans decided that buses are lame, and to not ride them anymore. It's certainly their right to do so, but it would be hard for that generation of Civil Rights workers to accept.
And consider this, as well. With the extensive farm league system, there are far more paying jobs playing baseball than in Basketball or Football... likely combined. The higher end salaries in baseball make a good deal more money than their football or basketball counterparts, and the lifespan of the average baseball athlete is also longer, significantly so when compared to football.
I think I can see why the pioneers would be irritated.
Absolutely. They fought hard to level the playing field (literally). Our country owes them a great debt. Unfortunately, their progeny didn't have nearly the same passion for baseball. So, now, they should just shut the fuck up and let them live their lives. I wouldn't force my kids to into my line of work, and neither should they.
A question concerning race
17/04/2012 07:00:05 PM
- 629 Views
Doesn't seem like a problem to me
17/04/2012 07:07:20 PM
- 415 Views
Yes
17/04/2012 08:27:47 PM
- 459 Views
It isn't discrimination. It would be if they do something to raise the participation rate though
17/04/2012 08:46:59 PM
- 388 Views
To me its not a problem... but I understand why some think it is.
17/04/2012 10:39:20 PM
- 461 Views
Yeah, Jackie is a real american hero.
18/04/2012 06:10:13 AM
- 413 Views
seems more about cultural trends than any kind of racial discrimination IMO *NM*
18/04/2012 05:45:39 AM
- 221 Views
Also, a person of, shall we say, Negro appearance, doesn't count if he's from Latin America
18/04/2012 11:22:07 AM
- 526 Views
I was going to point out it's not the 1970s, but for you "Negro" is practically progressive. *NM*
18/04/2012 11:54:20 AM
- 155 Views
In this context it's a suitable usage. Besides, wasn't the term used on the 2010 US Census? *NM*
18/04/2012 12:31:41 PM
- 183 Views
Wouldn't a spanish speaking dark-skinned person refer to themselves that way?
18/04/2012 12:51:43 PM
- 442 Views
Well at least he didn't use it as a noun THANK GOD AMIRITE #Privileged *NM*
19/04/2012 04:01:28 AM
- 217 Views