Honestly, I'm fine with convicted felons permanently losing their right to vote.....
Anonymous2000 Send a noteboard - 10/04/2012 04:34:31 AM
Don't break the law.
No voter fraud Mr. Holder? I beg to differ.....
09/04/2012 07:13:46 PM
- 661 Views
![](/site_media/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
The irony of a Republican-leaning person pointing this out...
*NM*
09/04/2012 08:37:33 PM
- 153 Views
![](/site_media/images/smilies/wink.gif)
Why is it ironic?
09/04/2012 09:54:10 PM
- 412 Views
The irony is merely that of the pot and the kettle
10/04/2012 01:05:39 AM
- 307 Views
If you are referring to FL in 2000.....those machines were bought by Dems.....
10/04/2012 01:17:26 AM
- 296 Views
Was thinking more about Ohio to be honest
10/04/2012 01:22:55 AM
- 307 Views
Intentional Voting Suppression is what they are trying to do in Florida right now(due to a 2011 law)
10/04/2012 04:22:25 AM
- 452 Views
Honestly, I'm fine with convicted felons permanently losing their right to vote.....
10/04/2012 04:34:31 AM
- 287 Views
I am also fine with stupid people not being allowed to vote
10/04/2012 04:36:20 AM
- 252 Views
Agreed - stupid people should not be allowed to vote, maybe an IQ test?
10/04/2012 05:17:43 AM
- 253 Views
I don't know about permanently...
10/04/2012 02:10:10 PM
- 273 Views
Who is talking about letting felons vote in prison?
10/04/2012 02:24:29 PM
- 353 Views
The League of Women Voters, for one
10/04/2012 08:50:39 PM
- 275 Views
Well, that is simply ridiculous then, and merits no consideration.
10/04/2012 11:53:04 PM
- 359 Views
To play Devil's Advocate, there's some legitimacy to the concept
11/04/2012 04:24:37 AM
- 323 Views
Sounds like people deliberately missing the point more than anything.
11/04/2012 07:45:40 AM
- 346 Views
Ohio? When? *NM*
10/04/2012 04:30:29 AM
- 103 Views
2008.
10/04/2012 04:37:15 AM
- 250 Views
Once again, Dems were running those polls and counties.
10/04/2012 05:19:14 AM
- 227 Views
they were not in 2004 and still had vote supression and irregularities
10/04/2012 04:44:36 PM
- 261 Views
I think you've got your facts wrong
10/04/2012 09:00:55 PM
- 271 Views
well, to be fair, it *has* been 8 years
11/04/2012 03:49:17 AM
- 353 Views
![](/site_media/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Fair Enough, my 'memory' is mostly google based on this anyway, from about a year ago and now
11/04/2012 04:00:57 AM
- 327 Views
Stating something doesn't make it true
10/04/2012 04:10:33 AM
- 320 Views
I'm impressed that you wrote so much in reply
10/04/2012 04:36:02 AM
- 276 Views
Then demonstrate that by having the courtesy to rebut it or withdraw your remarks
10/04/2012 06:30:52 AM
- 331 Views
How long voting takes is a function of machines, not voters.
10/04/2012 02:08:39 PM
- 345 Views
It's a function of various factors, that can certainly be one
10/04/2012 08:12:08 PM
- 297 Views
Ohio in 2004 was hinky enough to prompt the only Congressional challenge since 1876s Corrupt Bargain
10/04/2012 11:36:52 PM
- 418 Views
The fact that it's possible doesn't mean it's widespread, nor that every countermeasure is justified *NM*
10/04/2012 11:57:16 AM
- 120 Views
As long as people need not purchase their voting requirements, voter IDs are fine by me.
10/04/2012 12:53:35 PM
- 358 Views